鹿角测定法、爱尔兰麋鹿和古尔德再论

IF 1.9 2区 生物学 Q3 EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY
Masahito Tsuboi, Bjørn Tore Kopperud, Michael Matschiner, Mark Grabowski, Christine Syrowatka, Christophe Pélabon, Thomas F. Hansen
{"title":"鹿角测定法、爱尔兰麋鹿和古尔德再论","authors":"Masahito Tsuboi, Bjørn Tore Kopperud, Michael Matschiner, Mark Grabowski, Christine Syrowatka, Christophe Pélabon, Thomas F. Hansen","doi":"10.1007/s11692-023-09624-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The huge antlers of the extinct Irish elk have invited evolutionary speculation since Darwin. In the 1970s, Stephen Jay Gould presented the first extensive data on antler size in the Irish elk and combined these with comparative data from other deer to test the hypothesis that the gigantic antlers were the outcome of a positive allometry that constrained large-bodied deer to have proportionally even larger antlers. He concluded that the Irish elk had antlers as predicted for its size and interpreted this within his emerging framework of developmental constraints as an explanatory factor in evolution. Here we reanalyze antler allometry based on new morphometric data for 57 taxa of the family Cervidae. We also present a new phylogeny for the Cervidae, which we use for comparative analyses. In contrast to Gould, we find that the antlers of Irish elk were larger than predicted from the allometry within the true deer, Cervini, as analyzed by Gould, but follow the allometry across Cervidae as a whole. After dissecting the discrepancy, we reject the allometric-constraint hypothesis because, contrary to Gould, we find no similarity between static and evolutionary allometries, and because we document extensive non-allometric evolution of antler size across the Cervidae.</p>","PeriodicalId":50471,"journal":{"name":"Evolutionary Biology","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Antler Allometry, the Irish Elk and Gould Revisited\",\"authors\":\"Masahito Tsuboi, Bjørn Tore Kopperud, Michael Matschiner, Mark Grabowski, Christine Syrowatka, Christophe Pélabon, Thomas F. Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11692-023-09624-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The huge antlers of the extinct Irish elk have invited evolutionary speculation since Darwin. In the 1970s, Stephen Jay Gould presented the first extensive data on antler size in the Irish elk and combined these with comparative data from other deer to test the hypothesis that the gigantic antlers were the outcome of a positive allometry that constrained large-bodied deer to have proportionally even larger antlers. He concluded that the Irish elk had antlers as predicted for its size and interpreted this within his emerging framework of developmental constraints as an explanatory factor in evolution. Here we reanalyze antler allometry based on new morphometric data for 57 taxa of the family Cervidae. We also present a new phylogeny for the Cervidae, which we use for comparative analyses. In contrast to Gould, we find that the antlers of Irish elk were larger than predicted from the allometry within the true deer, Cervini, as analyzed by Gould, but follow the allometry across Cervidae as a whole. After dissecting the discrepancy, we reject the allometric-constraint hypothesis because, contrary to Gould, we find no similarity between static and evolutionary allometries, and because we document extensive non-allometric evolution of antler size across the Cervidae.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50471,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evolutionary Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09624-1\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evolutionary Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-023-09624-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自达尔文以来,已灭绝的爱尔兰麋鹿的巨大鹿角就引起了人们对进化论的猜测。20 世纪 70 年代,斯蒂芬-杰伊-古尔德首次提出了有关爱尔兰麋鹿鹿角大小的大量数据,并将这些数据与其他鹿的比较数据相结合,检验了这一假设,即巨大的鹿角是正异化作用的结果,正异化作用限制了大体型鹿按比例拥有更大的鹿角。他得出的结论是,爱尔兰麋鹿的鹿角符合其体型的预测,并在他新提出的发展限制框架内将其解释为进化中的一个解释因素。在此,我们根据鹿科 57 个类群的新形态计量数据,重新分析了鹿角的异构现象。我们还提出了一个新的鹿科系统发生,并将其用于比较分析。与古尔德不同的是,我们发现爱尔兰麋鹿的鹿角比古尔德分析的真正的鹿科(Cervini)内的异体几何学所预测的要大,但却与整个鹿科的异体几何学一致。在对这一差异进行剖析之后,我们否定了异构约束假说,因为与古尔德相反,我们发现静态异构和进化异构之间并不相似,而且我们还记录了整个鹿科动物鹿角大小的广泛非异构进化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Antler Allometry, the Irish Elk and Gould Revisited

Antler Allometry, the Irish Elk and Gould Revisited

The huge antlers of the extinct Irish elk have invited evolutionary speculation since Darwin. In the 1970s, Stephen Jay Gould presented the first extensive data on antler size in the Irish elk and combined these with comparative data from other deer to test the hypothesis that the gigantic antlers were the outcome of a positive allometry that constrained large-bodied deer to have proportionally even larger antlers. He concluded that the Irish elk had antlers as predicted for its size and interpreted this within his emerging framework of developmental constraints as an explanatory factor in evolution. Here we reanalyze antler allometry based on new morphometric data for 57 taxa of the family Cervidae. We also present a new phylogeny for the Cervidae, which we use for comparative analyses. In contrast to Gould, we find that the antlers of Irish elk were larger than predicted from the allometry within the true deer, Cervini, as analyzed by Gould, but follow the allometry across Cervidae as a whole. After dissecting the discrepancy, we reject the allometric-constraint hypothesis because, contrary to Gould, we find no similarity between static and evolutionary allometries, and because we document extensive non-allometric evolution of antler size across the Cervidae.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evolutionary Biology
Evolutionary Biology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim, scope, and format of Evolutionary Biology will be based on the following principles: Evolutionary Biology will publish original articles and reviews that address issues and subjects of core concern in evolutionary biology. All papers must make original contributions to our understanding of the evolutionary process. The journal will remain true to the original intent of the original series to provide a place for broad syntheses in evolutionary biology. Articles will contribute to this goal by defining the direction of current and future research and by building conceptual links between disciplines. In articles presenting an empirical analysis, the results of these analyses must be integrated within a broader evolutionary framework. Authors are encouraged to submit papers presenting novel conceptual frameworks or major challenges to accepted ideas. While brevity is encouraged, there is no formal restriction on length for major articles. The journal aims to keep the time between original submission and appearance online to within four months and will encourage authors to revise rapidly once a paper has been submitted and deemed acceptable.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信