战争中结肠直肠损伤的外科治疗。

Q4 Medicine
T Dušek, J Kotek, P Lochman
{"title":"战争中结肠直肠损伤的外科治疗。","authors":"T Dušek, J Kotek, P Lochman","doi":"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.8.321-326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rate of colorectal trauma is 5-10 % in modern war conflicts. The most common causes include gunshots or shrapnel injuries; the contusion-laceration mechanism occurs in sporadic cases in the war zone. Despite modern surgical procedures, however, it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated in time. Surgical management is specified by simple scoring schemes - the colon injury scale, rectal injury scale and the Flint grading system. Colonic resection with primary or delayed anastomosis is not associated with a higher risk of complicated healing and is nowadays preferred over the construction of terminal stomas. These are indicated only for cases with severe hemodynamic instability in traumatic-hemorrhagic or septic shock with severe diffuse peritonitis. Trauma to the intraperitoneal segment of the rectum is treated in the same way as trauma to the colon. An extraperitoneal rectal injury without soft tissue devastation can be treated with or without a transanal suture. On the contrary, devastating injuries to the rectum including the pelvic soft tissues should be primarily controlled with a stoma with delayed reconstruction. Presacral drainage or rectal stump lavage are no longer recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":52413,"journal":{"name":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","volume":"102 8","pages":"321-326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical management of colorectal injury in war.\",\"authors\":\"T Dušek, J Kotek, P Lochman\",\"doi\":\"10.33699/PIS.2023.102.8.321-326\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The rate of colorectal trauma is 5-10 % in modern war conflicts. The most common causes include gunshots or shrapnel injuries; the contusion-laceration mechanism occurs in sporadic cases in the war zone. Despite modern surgical procedures, however, it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated in time. Surgical management is specified by simple scoring schemes - the colon injury scale, rectal injury scale and the Flint grading system. Colonic resection with primary or delayed anastomosis is not associated with a higher risk of complicated healing and is nowadays preferred over the construction of terminal stomas. These are indicated only for cases with severe hemodynamic instability in traumatic-hemorrhagic or septic shock with severe diffuse peritonitis. Trauma to the intraperitoneal segment of the rectum is treated in the same way as trauma to the colon. An extraperitoneal rectal injury without soft tissue devastation can be treated with or without a transanal suture. On the contrary, devastating injuries to the rectum including the pelvic soft tissues should be primarily controlled with a stoma with delayed reconstruction. Presacral drainage or rectal stump lavage are no longer recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rozhledy v Chirurgii\",\"volume\":\"102 8\",\"pages\":\"321-326\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rozhledy v Chirurgii\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.8.321-326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rozhledy v Chirurgii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33699/PIS.2023.102.8.321-326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在现代战争冲突中,结肠直肠外伤的发生率为 5-10%。最常见的原因包括枪伤或弹片伤;挫伤-撕裂机制在战区时有发生。尽管采用了现代外科手术方法,但其发病率仍然很高,尤其是在未得到及时诊断和治疗的情况下。手术治疗是根据简单的评分标准--结肠损伤量表、直肠损伤量表和弗林特分级系统--来确定的。结肠切除并进行初端或延迟吻合不会增加复杂愈合的风险,如今,人们更倾向于进行结肠切除,而不是建造末端造口。只有在创伤性失血性休克或脓毒性休克伴有严重弥漫性腹膜炎、血流动力学严重不稳定的病例中才会使用这些方法。直肠腹膜内段创伤的治疗方法与结肠创伤相同。没有软组织损伤的腹膜外直肠损伤可采用或不采用经肛门缝合术进行治疗。相反,包括骨盆软组织在内的直肠破坏性损伤应主要通过造口和延迟重建来控制。不再推荐骶前引流或直肠残端灌洗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical management of colorectal injury in war.

The rate of colorectal trauma is 5-10 % in modern war conflicts. The most common causes include gunshots or shrapnel injuries; the contusion-laceration mechanism occurs in sporadic cases in the war zone. Despite modern surgical procedures, however, it is associated with a high rate of morbidity, especially if it is not diagnosed and treated in time. Surgical management is specified by simple scoring schemes - the colon injury scale, rectal injury scale and the Flint grading system. Colonic resection with primary or delayed anastomosis is not associated with a higher risk of complicated healing and is nowadays preferred over the construction of terminal stomas. These are indicated only for cases with severe hemodynamic instability in traumatic-hemorrhagic or septic shock with severe diffuse peritonitis. Trauma to the intraperitoneal segment of the rectum is treated in the same way as trauma to the colon. An extraperitoneal rectal injury without soft tissue devastation can be treated with or without a transanal suture. On the contrary, devastating injuries to the rectum including the pelvic soft tissues should be primarily controlled with a stoma with delayed reconstruction. Presacral drainage or rectal stump lavage are no longer recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rozhledy v Chirurgii
Rozhledy v Chirurgii Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
67
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信