美国社会服务和医疗机构中的怀孕选择咨询实践:系统文献综述。

IF 2.1 4区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL WORK
Social Work in Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1080/00981389.2024.2304016
Jennifer C Hollenberger, Elissa E Madden
{"title":"美国社会服务和医疗机构中的怀孕选择咨询实践:系统文献综述。","authors":"Jennifer C Hollenberger, Elissa E Madden","doi":"10.1080/00981389.2024.2304016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this systematic literature was to summarize the literature on pregnancy options counseling for women and patients who experience an unintended pregnancy across healthcare and social service settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA Checklist. Following the literature search of 8 electronic databases, we used a three-stage search process to screen articles for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for this study. Half (<i>n</i> = 10) of the articles reviewed were empirical studies utilizing quantitative or qualitative methodology while the other half (<i>n</i> = 10) were conceptual or non-empirical. The articles affirmed a shared definition of pregnancy options counseling, but terminology differences were noted over time. Lastly, variations of intervention practices appeared across practice settings, with referral practice variations being the most notable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy options counseling practices varied across settings, suggesting patients who received this intervention may not have accessed equitable or ethical care.</p>","PeriodicalId":47519,"journal":{"name":"Social Work in Health Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The practice of pregnancy options counseling in social service and healthcare settings in the United States: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Jennifer C Hollenberger, Elissa E Madden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00981389.2024.2304016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this systematic literature was to summarize the literature on pregnancy options counseling for women and patients who experience an unintended pregnancy across healthcare and social service settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA Checklist. Following the literature search of 8 electronic databases, we used a three-stage search process to screen articles for inclusion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 20 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for this study. Half (<i>n</i> = 10) of the articles reviewed were empirical studies utilizing quantitative or qualitative methodology while the other half (<i>n</i> = 10) were conceptual or non-empirical. The articles affirmed a shared definition of pregnancy options counseling, but terminology differences were noted over time. Lastly, variations of intervention practices appeared across practice settings, with referral practice variations being the most notable.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pregnancy options counseling practices varied across settings, suggesting patients who received this intervention may not have accessed equitable or ethical care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47519,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Work in Health Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Work in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2024.2304016\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL WORK\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Work in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00981389.2024.2304016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL WORK","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本系统性文献旨在总结在医疗保健和社会服务机构中为意外怀孕妇女和患者提供怀孕选择咨询的文献:我们采用 PRISMA 核对表进行了系统性文献综述。在对 8 个电子数据库进行文献检索后,我们采用了三阶段检索流程来筛选纳入文章:共有 20 篇经同行评审的文章符合本研究的纳入标准。其中一半(10 篇)是采用定量或定性方法进行的实证研究,另一半(10 篇)是概念研究或非实证研究。这些文章肯定了怀孕选择咨询的共同定义,但也注意到了不同时期的术语差异。最后,在不同的实践环境中,干预措施也存在差异,其中转介实践的差异最为显著:妊娠选择咨询在不同的实践环境中存在差异,这表明接受这种干预的患者可能无法获得公平或道德的医疗服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The practice of pregnancy options counseling in social service and healthcare settings in the United States: a systematic literature review.

Introduction: The purpose of this systematic literature was to summarize the literature on pregnancy options counseling for women and patients who experience an unintended pregnancy across healthcare and social service settings.

Methods: We conducted a systematic literature review using the PRISMA Checklist. Following the literature search of 8 electronic databases, we used a three-stage search process to screen articles for inclusion.

Results: A total of 20 peer-reviewed articles met the inclusion criteria for this study. Half (n = 10) of the articles reviewed were empirical studies utilizing quantitative or qualitative methodology while the other half (n = 10) were conceptual or non-empirical. The articles affirmed a shared definition of pregnancy options counseling, but terminology differences were noted over time. Lastly, variations of intervention practices appeared across practice settings, with referral practice variations being the most notable.

Conclusion: Pregnancy options counseling practices varied across settings, suggesting patients who received this intervention may not have accessed equitable or ethical care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Devoted to social work theory, practice, and administration in a wide variety of health care settings, this journal gives you the tools to improve your practice while keeping you up-to-date with the latest crucial information. Social Work in Health Care is edited by Gary Rosenberg, PhD, one of the most respected leaders in health social work. This creative, lively journal brings you the most important articles on research, leadership, clinical practice, management, education, collaborative relationships, social health policy, and ethical issues from the most respected experts in the field. The journal"s special issues comprehensively discuss a single pertinent health care theme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信