利用机器学习和可解释人工智能预测糖尿病足截肢风险。

IF 3.7 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Chien Wei Oei, Yam Meng Chan, Xiaojin Zhang, Kee Hao Leo, Enming Yong, Rhan Chaen Chong, Qiantai Hong, Li Zhang, Ying Pan, Glenn Wei Leong Tan, Malcolm Han Wen Mak
{"title":"利用机器学习和可解释人工智能预测糖尿病足截肢风险。","authors":"Chien Wei Oei, Yam Meng Chan, Xiaojin Zhang, Kee Hao Leo, Enming Yong, Rhan Chaen Chong, Qiantai Hong, Li Zhang, Ying Pan, Glenn Wei Leong Tan, Malcolm Han Wen Mak","doi":"10.1177/19322968241228606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications of diabetes which can lead to lower extremity amputations (LEAs). Risk prediction models can identify high-risk patients who can benefit from early intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have shown promising utility in medical applications. Explainable modeling can help its integration and acceptance. This study aims to develop a risk prediction model using ML algorithms with explainability for LEA in DFU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective review of 2559 inpatient DFU episodes in a tertiary institution from 2012 to 2017. Fifty-one features including patient demographics, comorbidities, medication, wound characteristics, and laboratory results were reviewed. Outcome measures were the risk of major LEA, minor LEA and any LEA. Machine learning models were developed for each outcome, with model performance evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, balanced-accuracy and F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the model for explainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performance for prediction of major, minor, and any LEA event achieved ROC of 0.820, 0.637, and 0.756, respectively, with XGBoost, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosted Trees algorithms demonstrating best results for each model, respectively. Using SHAP, key features that contributed to the predictions were identified for explainability. Total white cell (TWC) count, comorbidity score and red blood cell count contributed highest weightage to major LEA event. Total white cell, eosinophils, and necrotic eschar in the wound contributed most to any LEA event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning algorithms performed well in predicting the risk of LEA in a patient with DFU. Explainability can help provide clinical insights and identify at-risk patients for early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1008-1022"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.\",\"authors\":\"Chien Wei Oei, Yam Meng Chan, Xiaojin Zhang, Kee Hao Leo, Enming Yong, Rhan Chaen Chong, Qiantai Hong, Li Zhang, Ying Pan, Glenn Wei Leong Tan, Malcolm Han Wen Mak\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/19322968241228606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications of diabetes which can lead to lower extremity amputations (LEAs). Risk prediction models can identify high-risk patients who can benefit from early intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have shown promising utility in medical applications. Explainable modeling can help its integration and acceptance. This study aims to develop a risk prediction model using ML algorithms with explainability for LEA in DFU patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study is a retrospective review of 2559 inpatient DFU episodes in a tertiary institution from 2012 to 2017. Fifty-one features including patient demographics, comorbidities, medication, wound characteristics, and laboratory results were reviewed. Outcome measures were the risk of major LEA, minor LEA and any LEA. Machine learning models were developed for each outcome, with model performance evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, balanced-accuracy and F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the model for explainability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Model performance for prediction of major, minor, and any LEA event achieved ROC of 0.820, 0.637, and 0.756, respectively, with XGBoost, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosted Trees algorithms demonstrating best results for each model, respectively. Using SHAP, key features that contributed to the predictions were identified for explainability. Total white cell (TWC) count, comorbidity score and red blood cell count contributed highest weightage to major LEA event. Total white cell, eosinophils, and necrotic eschar in the wound contributed most to any LEA event.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Machine learning algorithms performed well in predicting the risk of LEA in a patient with DFU. Explainability can help provide clinical insights and identify at-risk patients for early intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15475,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1008-1022\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241228606\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968241228606","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)是糖尿病的严重并发症,可导致下肢截肢(LEAs)。风险预测模型可以识别高风险患者,使其从早期干预中获益。机器学习(ML)方法已在医疗应用中显示出良好的实用性。可解释的建模有助于其整合和接受。本研究旨在利用可解释的 ML 算法为 DFU 患者的 LEA 建立一个风险预测模型:本研究是对一家三级医院 2012 年至 2017 年期间 2559 例 DFU 住院病例的回顾性研究。研究回顾了51项特征,包括患者人口统计学特征、合并症、用药、伤口特征和实验室结果。结果测量指标为主要LEA、次要LEA和任何LEA的风险。针对每种结果开发了机器学习模型,并使用接收器操作特征曲线(ROC)、平衡精度和 F1 分数评估了模型的性能。结果:预测重大、次要和任何 LEA 事件的模型性能的 ROC 分别为 0.820、0.637 和 0.756,XGBoost、XGBoost 和梯度提升树算法分别为每个模型展示了最佳结果。利用 SHAP,确定了有助于预测的关键特征,以提高可解释性。白细胞总数(TWC)、合并症评分和红细胞计数对重大 LEA 事件的影响权重最高。白细胞总数、嗜酸性粒细胞和伤口坏死焦痂对任何 LEA 事件的影响最大:机器学习算法在预测DFU患者的LEA风险方面表现良好。可解释性有助于提供临床见解并识别高危患者,以便进行早期干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk Prediction of Diabetic Foot Amputation Using Machine Learning and Explainable Artificial Intelligence.

Background: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are serious complications of diabetes which can lead to lower extremity amputations (LEAs). Risk prediction models can identify high-risk patients who can benefit from early intervention. Machine learning (ML) methods have shown promising utility in medical applications. Explainable modeling can help its integration and acceptance. This study aims to develop a risk prediction model using ML algorithms with explainability for LEA in DFU patients.

Methods: This study is a retrospective review of 2559 inpatient DFU episodes in a tertiary institution from 2012 to 2017. Fifty-one features including patient demographics, comorbidities, medication, wound characteristics, and laboratory results were reviewed. Outcome measures were the risk of major LEA, minor LEA and any LEA. Machine learning models were developed for each outcome, with model performance evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, balanced-accuracy and F1-score. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was applied to interpret the model for explainability.

Results: Model performance for prediction of major, minor, and any LEA event achieved ROC of 0.820, 0.637, and 0.756, respectively, with XGBoost, XGBoost, and Gradient Boosted Trees algorithms demonstrating best results for each model, respectively. Using SHAP, key features that contributed to the predictions were identified for explainability. Total white cell (TWC) count, comorbidity score and red blood cell count contributed highest weightage to major LEA event. Total white cell, eosinophils, and necrotic eschar in the wound contributed most to any LEA event.

Conclusions: Machine learning algorithms performed well in predicting the risk of LEA in a patient with DFU. Explainability can help provide clinical insights and identify at-risk patients for early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信