COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科分诊系统的可预测性。

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.107
Se Young Oh, Ji Hwan Lee, Min Joung Kim, Dong Ryul Ko, Hyun Soo Chung, Incheol Park, Jinwoo Myung
{"title":"COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科分诊系统的可预测性。","authors":"Se Young Oh, Ji Hwan Lee, Min Joung Kim, Dong Ryul Ko, Hyun Soo Chung, Incheol Park, Jinwoo Myung","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"195-204"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictability of the emergency department triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic.\",\"authors\":\"Se Young Oh, Ji Hwan Lee, Min Joung Kim, Dong Ryul Ko, Hyun Soo Chung, Incheol Park, Jinwoo Myung\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.23.107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"195-204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:急诊科(ED)分诊系统用于对急诊病人的严重程度和紧急程度进行分类,韩国医疗机构使用韩国分诊和急性量表(KTAS)。在 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间,由于急诊室人满为患、医务人员资源匮乏、医务人员工作量增加等各种原因,急诊患者的适当治疗被延误。本研究旨在评估 KTAS 在 COVID-19 大流行期间预测急诊病人紧急程度的准确性:本研究对 2020 年 1 月至 2021 年 6 月大流行期间在急诊室接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性分析。患者被分为 COVID-19 筛查阴性组(SN 组)和 COVID-19 筛查阳性组(SP 组)。我们比较了两组急诊患者 KTAS 的可预测性:在 107,480 名患者中,SN 组和 SP 组分别有 62,776 名(58.4%)和 44,704 名(41.6%)患者。KTAS各等级严重程度变量的几率比显示,KTAS对SN组严重程度变量的判别能力更明显(P值 结论:KTAS对SN组严重程度变量的判别能力更明显:在大流行期间,KTAS 预测急诊室危重病人的准确性较低。因此,在未来的大流行期间,应考虑对目前的急诊室分诊系统进行补充,以便准确地对患者的严重程度进行分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictability of the emergency department triage system during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Objective: Emergency department (ED) triage systems are used to classify the severity and urgency of emergency patients, and Korean medical institutions use the Korean Triage and Acuity Scale (KTAS). During the COVID-19 pandemic, appropriate treatment for emergency patients was delayed due to various circumstances, such as overcrowding of EDs, lack of medical workforce resources, and increased workload on medical staff. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the KTAS in predicting the urgency of emergency patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed patients who were treated in the ED during the pandemic period from January 2020 to June 2021. Patients were divided into COVID-19-screening negative (SN) and COVID-19-screening positive (SP) groups. We compared the predictability of the KTAS for urgent patients between the two groups.

Results: From a total of 107,480 patients, 62,776 patients (58.4%) were included in the SN group and 44,704 (41.6%) were included in the SP group. The odds ratios for severity variables at each KTAS level revealed a more evident discriminatory power of the KTAS for severity variables in the SN group (P<0.001). The predictability of the KTAS for severity variables was higher in the SN group than in the SP group (area under the curve, P<0.001).

Conclusion: During the pandemic, the KTAS had low accuracy in predicting patients in critical condition in the ED. Therefore, in future pandemic periods, supplementation of the current ED triage system should be considered in order to accurately classify the severity of patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信