多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验:金刚烷胺用于刺激心脏骤停复苏的昏迷患者苏醒。

IF 1.9 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.15441/ceem.23.158
Patrick J Coppler, David J Gagnon, Katharyn L Flickinger, Jonathan Elmer, Clifton W Callaway, Francis X Guyette, Ankur Doshi, Alexis Steinberg, Cameron Dezfulian, Ari L Moskowitz, Michael Donnino, Teresa L May, David B Seder, Jon C Rittenberger
{"title":"多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验:金刚烷胺用于刺激心脏骤停复苏的昏迷患者苏醒。","authors":"Patrick J Coppler, David J Gagnon, Katharyn L Flickinger, Jonathan Elmer, Clifton W Callaway, Francis X Guyette, Ankur Doshi, Alexis Steinberg, Cameron Dezfulian, Ari L Moskowitz, Michael Donnino, Teresa L May, David B Seder, Jon C Rittenberger","doi":"10.15441/ceem.23.158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":10325,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"205-212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237252/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine to stimulate awakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick J Coppler, David J Gagnon, Katharyn L Flickinger, Jonathan Elmer, Clifton W Callaway, Francis X Guyette, Ankur Doshi, Alexis Steinberg, Cameron Dezfulian, Ari L Moskowitz, Michael Donnino, Teresa L May, David B Seder, Jon C Rittenberger\",\"doi\":\"10.15441/ceem.23.158\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"205-212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11237252/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.158\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15441/ceem.23.158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的我们假设,服用金刚烷胺可提高心脏骤停昏迷患者的苏醒率:我们进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,将受试者随机分配到金刚烷胺 100 毫克,每天两次,或安慰剂,最多持续 7 天。研究药物在复苏后 72-120 小时内给药,排除了 N20 皮层反应缺失、早期脑水肿或恶性脑电图模式持续存在的患者。我们的主要研究结果是心脏骤停后 28 天内的苏醒情况,苏醒的定义是遵从两步指令。次要结果包括住院时间、苏醒情况、苏醒时间以及出院时根据脑功能分类(CPC)测量的神经功能结果。我们使用费雪精确检验比较了苏醒比例和住院存活率,使用 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较了苏醒时间和住院时间:两年后,由于入组缓慢和资金短缺,我们停止了这项研究。我们共招募了 14 名受试者(占目标招募人数的 12%),其中金刚烷胺组 7 人,安慰剂组 7 人。心脏骤停后 28 天内苏醒的患者比例在金刚烷胺组(2 人,28.57%)和安慰剂组(3 人,42.86%)之间没有差异(P = 1.00)。次要结果无差异。有 3 名受试者(21%)停用了研究药物。不良事件包括癫痫复发(2例,14%),这两种情况均发生在安慰剂组:由于样本量较小,我们无法确定金刚烷胺对心脏骤停昏迷幸存者苏醒的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multicenter, randomized, doubleblind, placebo-controlled trial of amantadine to stimulate awakening in comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.

Objective: We hypothesized that the administration of amantadine would increase awakening of comatose patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest.

Methods: We performed a prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial, randomizing subjects to amantadine 100 mg twice daily or placebo for up to 7 days. The study drug was administered between 72 and 120 hours after resuscitation and patients with absent N20 cortical responses, early cerebral edema, or ongoing malignant electroencephalography patterns were excluded. Our primary outcome was awakening, defined as following two-step commands, within 28 days of cardiac arrest. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, awakening, time to awakening, and neurologic outcome measured by Cerebral Performance Category at hospital discharge. We compared the proportion of subjects awakening and hospital survival using Fisher exact tests and time to awakening and hospital length of stay using Wilcoxon rank sum tests.

Results: After 2 years, we stopped the study due to slow enrollment and lapse of funding. We enrolled 14 subjects (12% of goal enrollment), seven in the amantadine group and seven in the placebo group. The proportion of patients who awakened within 28 days after cardiac arrest did not differ between amantadine (n=2, 28.6%) and placebo groups (n=3, 42.9%; P>0.99). There were no differences in secondary outcomes. Study medication was stopped in three subjects (21.4%). Adverse events included a recurrence of seizures (n=2; 14.3%), both of which occurred in the placebo group.

Conclusion: We could not determine the effect of amantadine on awakening in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest due to small sample size.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
10.50%
发文量
59
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信