Hannah B Knox, Lisa A Dykes, Lancer A Scott, Bradley C Presley, Lara C Lambert
{"title":"单克隆抗体输注用于门诊治疗轻度-中度 COVID-19。","authors":"Hannah B Knox, Lisa A Dykes, Lancer A Scott, Bradley C Presley, Lara C Lambert","doi":"10.1177/10600280231222465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; <i>P</i> = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (<i>P</i> = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monoclonal Antibody Infusions for Outpatient Management of Mild-Moderate COVID-19.\",\"authors\":\"Hannah B Knox, Lisa A Dykes, Lancer A Scott, Bradley C Presley, Lara C Lambert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10600280231222465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; <i>P</i> = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; <i>P</i> = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (<i>P</i> = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (<i>P</i> = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and relevance: </strong>Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280231222465\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10600280231222465","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:COVID-19 大流行导致住院人数和发病率/死亡率呈指数级快速增长。2020 年 11 月,美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA) 发布了紧急使用授权 (EUA),允许使用首批单克隆抗体 (mAb),用于 COVID-19 的门诊治疗。早期数据显示,与 COVID-19 相关的住院人数有所减少,不良反应也很少。然而,由于这些治疗仅获得欧盟授权,实际数据极少:目的:评估 mAbs 在退伍军人群体中的疗效和安全性:这项回顾性研究分析了拉尔夫-约翰逊退伍军人事务医疗保健系统(Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System)中患有轻中度 COVID-19 并在 2020 年 12 月 1 日至 2021 年 10 月 31 日期间通过 mAb 资格筛选的退伍军人。主要结果是 30 天内的住院和/或急诊就诊。次要结果包括 30 天死亡率和 COVID-19 后的情况。此外,还对不良事件进行了评估。对接受过 mAb 治疗的患者和未接受治疗的合格退伍军人的结果进行了比较:mAb 组和对照组分别有 296 名和 275 名退伍军人。主要结果的总体差异(25.7% 对 25.1%;P = 0.87)和 COVID-19 相关的复诊或住院差异(13.9% 对 16%;P = 0.4)均无统计学意义。然而,mAb组的急诊室复诊率更高(P = 0.35),对照组的住院率明显更高(P = 0.02)。接种过 mAb 的退伍军人复诊和住院次数较少(P = 0.01)。更多接受过 mAb 治疗的退伍军人出现了 COVID-19 后遗症。死亡率方面没有发现差异。mAb治疗后发生了4起非严重不良事件:总体而言,mAb 看起来安全有效。接受过 mAb 治疗的病情较重、风险较高的退伍军人与未接受治疗的病情较轻、风险较高的退伍军人的情况相似。接种过疫苗的退伍军人似乎从 mAb 治疗中获益最多。未来需要进行更多匹配群体的前瞻性研究,以评估中和主要变体的 mAb 的全部益处和风险。
Monoclonal Antibody Infusions for Outpatient Management of Mild-Moderate COVID-19.
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a rapid, exponential increase in hospitalizations and morbidity/mortality. In November 2020, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Emergency Use Authorizations (EUAs) permitting administration of the first monoclonal antibodies (mAb) for outpatient treatment of COVID-19. Early data showed a reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalizations with few adverse events. However, since these treatments are only authorized under an EUA, real-world data are minimal.
Objective: To assess efficacy and safety of mAbs in a veteran population.
Methods: This retrospective study analyzed veterans at the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System with mild-moderate COVID-19 and screened for mAb eligibility between December 1, 2020, and October 31, 2021. The primary outcome was hospitalizations and/or emergency department (ED) visits within 30 days. Secondary outcomes included 30-day mortality and post-COVID-19 conditions. Adverse events were also evaluated. Outcomes were compared between mAb-treated patients and eligible veterans who were not treated.
Results: There were 296 and 275 veterans in the mAb and control groups, respectively. No statistically significant difference was found for the primary outcome overall (25.7% vs 25.1%; P = 0.87), nor for COVID-19-related return visits or hospitalizations (13.9% v. 16%; P = 0.4). However, the mAb group had more return ED visits (P = 0.35), and the control group had significantly more hospitalizations (P = 0.02). Vaccinated veterans who received an mAb had fewer return visits and hospitalizations (P = 0.01). More mAb-treated veterans experienced post-COVID-19 conditions. No difference in mortality was found. Four nonsevere adverse events occurred after the mAb therapy.
Conclusion and relevance: Overall, the mAbs appeared safe and effective. Sicker, higher-risk mAb-treated veterans faired similarly to less-sick, high-risk veterans not treated. Those who were vaccinated seemed to benefit the most from mAb therapy. Future prospective studies with more matched groups are needed to assess full benefits and risks of mAbs shown to neutralize the predominant variants.