预期及其批判性-反思性-激进程度：打开参与未来的可能性，以解决科技创新问题

IF 3.9 1区哲学 Q1 ETHICS

Journal of Responsible Innovation Pub Date : 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1080/23299460.2023.2294537

Sergio Urueña

引用次数: 0

摘要

人们日益认识到，预测是促进更负责任的科技创新实践的一个重要方面。各种规范性框架都承认，预测是一种手段，可以促进批评和......

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Anticipation and its degrees of critical-reflective radicality: opening up the affordances of engaging with futures to problematize STI

Anticipation is increasingly recognized as a valuable dimension for promoting more responsible STI practices. Various normative frameworks acknowledge anticipation as a means to enable critique and...

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Responsible Innovation Multiple-

CiteScore

8.60

自引率

20.50%

发文量

审稿时长

12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.