非侵入性手术前使用电话对高风险患者进行麻醉咨询是否安全?眼科试点研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-27 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231222661
Gilles Guerrier, Johanna Ohayon, Pierre-Raphaël Rothschild, Christophe Baillard
{"title":"非侵入性手术前使用电话对高风险患者进行麻醉咨询是否安全?眼科试点研究。","authors":"Gilles Guerrier, Johanna Ohayon, Pierre-Raphaël Rothschild, Christophe Baillard","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231222661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough telemedicine with video support for preoperative evaluation has been found effective, there is limited research on anaesthesia consultation by phone without video support, particularly among high-risk patients. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and potential benefits of performing pre-anaesthesia evaluation by phone before eye surgery in patients having non-invasive surgery, we performed an observational study in a French teaching hospital.MethodAll elective patients having elective ophthalmic surgery were included to have a consultation by phone instead of an in-person consultation, regardless of the type of anaesthesia or ASA score. The incidence of day-of-surgery cancellations, patient satisfaction and time/distance saved through phone consultations were assessed.ResultsFrom February to October 2022, data of 3480 patients were analyzed, including 370 (11%) high-risk patients (ASA 3-4). Anaesthesia-related day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 0.5% (<i>n</i> = 20) due to non-compliance with pre-operative instructions. No cancellation was due to inadequate pre-operative evaluation. No difference in cancellation rate was observed between low-risk patients and high-risk patients. Telephone consultations saved patients a mean of 126 min and 86 km. A younger age, an active status and living far from the hospital were associated with phone consultation preference.ConclusionPhone anaesthesia consultation seems to be effective and safe before ophthalmic surgery, regardless of patient's perioperative risk. In addition, phone consultation provides significant time and distance savings. Our results must be confirmed through a multicentric randomised study comparing phone and traditional consultation in ophthalmology as well as in other non-invasive surgical procedures in a high-risk patients population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"807-810"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it safe to use telephone for anaesthesia consultation in high-risk patients before non-invasive surgery? A pilot study in ophthalmology.\",\"authors\":\"Gilles Guerrier, Johanna Ohayon, Pierre-Raphaël Rothschild, Christophe Baillard\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X231222661\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAlthough telemedicine with video support for preoperative evaluation has been found effective, there is limited research on anaesthesia consultation by phone without video support, particularly among high-risk patients. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and potential benefits of performing pre-anaesthesia evaluation by phone before eye surgery in patients having non-invasive surgery, we performed an observational study in a French teaching hospital.MethodAll elective patients having elective ophthalmic surgery were included to have a consultation by phone instead of an in-person consultation, regardless of the type of anaesthesia or ASA score. The incidence of day-of-surgery cancellations, patient satisfaction and time/distance saved through phone consultations were assessed.ResultsFrom February to October 2022, data of 3480 patients were analyzed, including 370 (11%) high-risk patients (ASA 3-4). Anaesthesia-related day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 0.5% (<i>n</i> = 20) due to non-compliance with pre-operative instructions. No cancellation was due to inadequate pre-operative evaluation. No difference in cancellation rate was observed between low-risk patients and high-risk patients. Telephone consultations saved patients a mean of 126 min and 86 km. A younger age, an active status and living far from the hospital were associated with phone consultation preference.ConclusionPhone anaesthesia consultation seems to be effective and safe before ophthalmic surgery, regardless of patient's perioperative risk. In addition, phone consultation provides significant time and distance savings. Our results must be confirmed through a multicentric randomised study comparing phone and traditional consultation in ophthalmology as well as in other non-invasive surgical procedures in a high-risk patients population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"807-810\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231222661\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231222661","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虽然有视频支持的远程医疗在术前评估方面效果显著,但对无视频支持的电话麻醉咨询,尤其是对高风险患者的麻醉咨询的研究还很有限。为了评估在眼科手术前通过电话对非侵入性手术患者进行麻醉前评估的有效性、安全性和潜在益处,我们在一家法国教学医院开展了一项观察性研究:方法:所有接受眼科手术的择期患者,无论其麻醉类型或 ASA 评分如何,均被纳入电话会诊范围,而非亲自会诊。对手术当天取消会诊的发生率、患者满意度以及通过电话会诊节省的时间/距离进行了评估:结果:分析了 2022 年 2 月至 10 月期间 3480 名患者的数据,其中包括 370 名(11%)高风险患者(ASA 3-4)。由于未遵守术前说明,手术当天与麻醉相关的取消率为 0.5%(n = 20)。没有人因为术前评估不充分而取消手术。低风险患者和高风险患者的取消率没有差异。电话咨询为患者节省了平均 126 分钟和 86 公里的时间。年龄越小、工作状态越活跃、居住地离医院越远的患者越倾向于电话咨询:结论:无论患者的围手术期风险如何,眼科手术前电话麻醉咨询似乎都是有效和安全的。此外,电话咨询还能大大节省时间和距离。我们的研究结果必须通过一项多中心随机研究加以证实,该研究比较了电话咨询和传统咨询在眼科以及其他非侵入性外科手术中在高风险患者人群中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Is it safe to use telephone for anaesthesia consultation in high-risk patients before non-invasive surgery? A pilot study in ophthalmology.

BackgroundAlthough telemedicine with video support for preoperative evaluation has been found effective, there is limited research on anaesthesia consultation by phone without video support, particularly among high-risk patients. To evaluate the effectiveness, safety and potential benefits of performing pre-anaesthesia evaluation by phone before eye surgery in patients having non-invasive surgery, we performed an observational study in a French teaching hospital.MethodAll elective patients having elective ophthalmic surgery were included to have a consultation by phone instead of an in-person consultation, regardless of the type of anaesthesia or ASA score. The incidence of day-of-surgery cancellations, patient satisfaction and time/distance saved through phone consultations were assessed.ResultsFrom February to October 2022, data of 3480 patients were analyzed, including 370 (11%) high-risk patients (ASA 3-4). Anaesthesia-related day-of-surgery cancellation rate was 0.5% (n = 20) due to non-compliance with pre-operative instructions. No cancellation was due to inadequate pre-operative evaluation. No difference in cancellation rate was observed between low-risk patients and high-risk patients. Telephone consultations saved patients a mean of 126 min and 86 km. A younger age, an active status and living far from the hospital were associated with phone consultation preference.ConclusionPhone anaesthesia consultation seems to be effective and safe before ophthalmic surgery, regardless of patient's perioperative risk. In addition, phone consultation provides significant time and distance savings. Our results must be confirmed through a multicentric randomised study comparing phone and traditional consultation in ophthalmology as well as in other non-invasive surgical procedures in a high-risk patients population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信