{"title":"治疗膝关节骨关节炎的十六烷基化脂肪酸口服制剂与美洛昔康的比较:随机临床试验","authors":"Sepide Mohebi, Hamid Reza Farpour, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Sana Sadat Khoshnazar","doi":"10.31138/mjr.220823.aof","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective/aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t<sub>0</sub>), and two (t<sub>1</sub>), four (t<sub>2</sub>), and eight (t<sub>3</sub>) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, or t<sub>3</sub>. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t<sub>0</sub>). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":32816,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","volume":"34 4","pages":"460-468"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10815532/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Oral Form of Cetylated Fatty Acids versus Meloxicam for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Sepide Mohebi, Hamid Reza Farpour, Kayvon Seyed Dehghanian, Sana Sadat Khoshnazar\",\"doi\":\"10.31138/mjr.220823.aof\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective/aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t<sub>0</sub>), and two (t<sub>1</sub>), four (t<sub>2</sub>), and eight (t<sub>3</sub>) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t<sub>1</sub>, t<sub>2</sub>, or t<sub>3</sub>. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t<sub>0</sub>). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":32816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"volume\":\"34 4\",\"pages\":\"460-468\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10815532/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.220823.aof\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean Journal of Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31138/mjr.220823.aof","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的/意义:本研究旨在评估一种口服形式的十六烷基化脂肪酸化合物(CFA)在改善膝关节骨关节炎(OA)患者的身体功能、疼痛和僵硬程度方面的效果,以及它与非类固醇消炎药(NSAID)美洛昔康的效果比较:在这项平行臂随机临床试验中,48 名患有膝关节 OA 的成年患者被分为两组。干预组服用 350 毫克 CFA 胶囊,每天三次,持续 30 天。对照组服用 15 毫克美洛昔康,每天一片,持续 10 天。指导患者填写牛津膝关节评分(OKS)、西安大略和麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数(WOMAC)以及视觉模拟量表(VAS)。数据采集于首次用药前(视为基线或t0),以及最后一次用药后的两周(t1)、四周(t2)和八周(t3):两组患者在 t1、t2 或 t3 期的 WOMAC 和 OKS 总分均无明显差异。不过,与基线(t0)相比,两组的 OKS、VAS 和 WOMAC 总分均有明显改善。CFA组未发现任何不良反应:结论:CFA组患者的疼痛强度和整体身体功能均有所改善。口服 CFA 可以使膝关节 OA 患者安全获益。
An Oral Form of Cetylated Fatty Acids versus Meloxicam for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomised Clinical Trial.
Objective/aim: This study aimed to assess how effective an oral form of Cetylated fatty acids compounds (CFA) is in improving the physical function, pain, and stiffness of individuals suffering from knee osteoarthritis (OA) and how its effectiveness compares to that of Meloxicam, a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID).
Methods: For this parallel-arm randomised clinical trial, 48 adult patients with knee OA were divided into two groups. The intervention group was prescribed 350mg CFA capsule three times per day for 30 days. The control group was given 15mg of Meloxicam, one tablet daily for ten days. Patients were instructed to fill out the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Data were obtained before the administration of the first dose (considered baseline or t0), and two (t1), four (t2), and eight (t3) weeks after the final dose of each intervention.
Results: No significant differences were observed in total WOMAC and OKS scores between the two groups at t1, t2, or t3. However, both groups had significant improvements in their OKS, VAS, and total WOMAC scores compared to their baselines (t0). No adverse events were noted in the CFA group.
Conclusion: Improvements in pain intensity and overall physical function were reported in the CFA group. Oral CFAs could safely benefit patients with knee OA.