评估贝顿评分作为测量校队运动员全身关节活动度过高的方法的结构有效性。

Q3 Health Professions
Andrew Parks, Mohsen Kazemi, David Frost, Samuel J Howarth
{"title":"评估贝顿评分作为测量校队运动员全身关节活动度过高的方法的结构有效性。","authors":"Andrew Parks, Mohsen Kazemi, David Frost, Samuel J Howarth","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Beighton Score (BS) is a tool that dichotomizes those who have generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and those who do not. Unfortunately, the BS is often used in populations that it was not originally developed for, including athletes for screening purposes. The construct validity of the BS remains unknown in this population. This secondary analysis investigated the construct validity of the BS by comparing varsity athletes' passive shoulder and hip ranges of motion (ROMs) to their respective BS and individual forward bend tests (FBTs). There were statistically significant but weak correlations between shoulder ROMs and the BS (r=0.142, p=0.021). Mean hip ROMs were greater by 5-degrees in those with positive FBTs compared to those with negative FBTs. This difference falls within typical measurement errors that occur in practice. Therefore, our results do not support the construct validity of the BS as a measure of GJH in healthy athletes.</p>","PeriodicalId":38036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10814702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing construct validity of the Beighton Score as a measure of generalized joint hypermobility in varsity athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Parks, Mohsen Kazemi, David Frost, Samuel J Howarth\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The Beighton Score (BS) is a tool that dichotomizes those who have generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and those who do not. Unfortunately, the BS is often used in populations that it was not originally developed for, including athletes for screening purposes. The construct validity of the BS remains unknown in this population. This secondary analysis investigated the construct validity of the BS by comparing varsity athletes' passive shoulder and hip ranges of motion (ROMs) to their respective BS and individual forward bend tests (FBTs). There were statistically significant but weak correlations between shoulder ROMs and the BS (r=0.142, p=0.021). Mean hip ROMs were greater by 5-degrees in those with positive FBTs compared to those with negative FBTs. This difference falls within typical measurement errors that occur in practice. Therefore, our results do not support the construct validity of the BS as a measure of GJH in healthy athletes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38036,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10814702/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

贝顿评分(BS)是一种将全身关节过度活动症(GJH)患者与非患者进行二分的工具。遗憾的是,BS 常常被用于最初开发时并不适用的人群,包括用于筛查的运动员。在这类人群中,BS 的结构效度仍是未知数。这项二次分析通过比较校队运动员的肩关节和髋关节被动运动范围(ROMs)与各自的 BS 和个人前屈测试(FBTs),对 BS 的构造效度进行了研究。肩关节 ROM 与 BS 之间存在统计学意义上的明显但微弱的相关性(r=0.142,p=0.021)。与 FBT 呈阴性的人相比,FBT 呈阳性的人的平均髋关节活动度要大 5 度。这一差异属于实践中常见的测量误差范围。因此,我们的结果并不支持将 BS 作为健康运动员 GJH 测量指标的构建有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing construct validity of the Beighton Score as a measure of generalized joint hypermobility in varsity athletes.

The Beighton Score (BS) is a tool that dichotomizes those who have generalized joint hypermobility (GJH) and those who do not. Unfortunately, the BS is often used in populations that it was not originally developed for, including athletes for screening purposes. The construct validity of the BS remains unknown in this population. This secondary analysis investigated the construct validity of the BS by comparing varsity athletes' passive shoulder and hip ranges of motion (ROMs) to their respective BS and individual forward bend tests (FBTs). There were statistically significant but weak correlations between shoulder ROMs and the BS (r=0.142, p=0.021). Mean hip ROMs were greater by 5-degrees in those with positive FBTs compared to those with negative FBTs. This difference falls within typical measurement errors that occur in practice. Therefore, our results do not support the construct validity of the BS as a measure of GJH in healthy athletes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association
Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association Health Professions-Chiropractics
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association (JCCA) publishes research papers, commentaries and editorials relevant to the practice of chiropractic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信