应用机器学习算法预测女性骨质疏松性骨折。

IF 1.4 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Korean Journal of Family Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-29 DOI:10.4082/kjfm.23.0186
Su Jeong Kang, Moon Jong Kim, Yang-Im Hur, Ji-Hee Haam, Young-Sang Kim
{"title":"应用机器学习算法预测女性骨质疏松性骨折。","authors":"Su Jeong Kang, Moon Jong Kim, Yang-Im Hur, Ji-Hee Haam, Young-Sang Kim","doi":"10.4082/kjfm.23.0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting the risk of osteoporotic fractures is vital for prevention. Traditional methods such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) model use clinical factors. This study examined the predictive power of the FRAX score and machine-learning algorithms trained on FRAX parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data of 2,147 female participants from the Ansan cohort study. The FRAX parameters employed in this study included age, sex (female), height and weight, current smoking status, excessive alcohol consumption (>3 units/d of alcohol), and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporotic fracture was defined as one or more fractures of the hip, spine, or wrist during a 10-year observation period. Machine-learning algorithms, such as gradient boosting, random forest, decision tree, and logistic regression, were employed to predict osteoporotic fractures with a 70:30 training-to-test set ratio. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores to assess and compare the performance of these algorithms with the FRAX score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,147 participants, 3.5% experienced osteoporotic fractures. Those with fractures were older, shorter in height, and had a higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as higher FRAX scores. The AUROC for the FRAX was 0.617. The machine-learning algorithms showed AUROC values of 0.662, 0.652, 0.648, and 0.637 for gradient boosting, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the immense potential of machine-learning algorithms to improve osteoporotic fracture risk prediction in women when complete FRAX parameter information is unavailable.</p>","PeriodicalId":17893,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"144-148"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Osteoporotic Fractures in Women.\",\"authors\":\"Su Jeong Kang, Moon Jong Kim, Yang-Im Hur, Ji-Hee Haam, Young-Sang Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4082/kjfm.23.0186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting the risk of osteoporotic fractures is vital for prevention. Traditional methods such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) model use clinical factors. This study examined the predictive power of the FRAX score and machine-learning algorithms trained on FRAX parameters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed the data of 2,147 female participants from the Ansan cohort study. The FRAX parameters employed in this study included age, sex (female), height and weight, current smoking status, excessive alcohol consumption (>3 units/d of alcohol), and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporotic fracture was defined as one or more fractures of the hip, spine, or wrist during a 10-year observation period. Machine-learning algorithms, such as gradient boosting, random forest, decision tree, and logistic regression, were employed to predict osteoporotic fractures with a 70:30 training-to-test set ratio. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores to assess and compare the performance of these algorithms with the FRAX score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,147 participants, 3.5% experienced osteoporotic fractures. Those with fractures were older, shorter in height, and had a higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as higher FRAX scores. The AUROC for the FRAX was 0.617. The machine-learning algorithms showed AUROC values of 0.662, 0.652, 0.648, and 0.637 for gradient boosting, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlighted the immense potential of machine-learning algorithms to improve osteoporotic fracture risk prediction in women when complete FRAX parameter information is unavailable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17893,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"144-148\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11116127/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Family Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Family Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4082/kjfm.23.0186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:预测骨质疏松性骨折的风险对预防至关重要。骨折风险评估工具(FRAX)模型等传统方法使用的是临床因素。本研究考察了 FRAX 评分和根据 FRAX 参数训练的机器学习算法的预测能力:我们分析了安山队列研究中 2,147 名女性参与者的数据。本研究采用的 FRAX 参数包括年龄、性别(女性)、身高和体重、当前吸烟状况、过量饮酒(酒精摄入量大于 3 单位/天)以及类风湿性关节炎诊断。骨质疏松性骨折的定义是在 10 年观察期内髋部、脊柱或腕部发生过一次或多次骨折。我们采用梯度提升、随机森林、决策树和逻辑回归等机器学习算法来预测骨质疏松性骨折,训练集与测试集的比例为 70:30。我们评估了接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)分数,以评估和比较这些算法与 FRAX 分数的性能:在 2,147 名参与者中,3.5% 出现了骨质疏松性骨折。骨折患者年龄较大,身高较矮,类风湿性关节炎发病率较高,FRAX评分也较高。FRAX的AUROC为0.617。梯度提升、逻辑回归、决策树和随机森林的机器学习算法的AUROC值分别为0.662、0.652、0.648和0.637:本研究强调了机器学习算法在缺乏完整的 FRAX 参数信息时改善女性骨质疏松性骨折风险预测的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of Machine Learning Algorithms to Predict Osteoporotic Fractures in Women.

Background: Predicting the risk of osteoporotic fractures is vital for prevention. Traditional methods such as the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) model use clinical factors. This study examined the predictive power of the FRAX score and machine-learning algorithms trained on FRAX parameters.

Methods: We analyzed the data of 2,147 female participants from the Ansan cohort study. The FRAX parameters employed in this study included age, sex (female), height and weight, current smoking status, excessive alcohol consumption (>3 units/d of alcohol), and diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Osteoporotic fracture was defined as one or more fractures of the hip, spine, or wrist during a 10-year observation period. Machine-learning algorithms, such as gradient boosting, random forest, decision tree, and logistic regression, were employed to predict osteoporotic fractures with a 70:30 training-to-test set ratio. We evaluated the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) scores to assess and compare the performance of these algorithms with the FRAX score.

Results: Of the 2,147 participants, 3.5% experienced osteoporotic fractures. Those with fractures were older, shorter in height, and had a higher prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, as well as higher FRAX scores. The AUROC for the FRAX was 0.617. The machine-learning algorithms showed AUROC values of 0.662, 0.652, 0.648, and 0.637 for gradient boosting, logistic regression, decision tree, and random forest, respectively.

Conclusion: This study highlighted the immense potential of machine-learning algorithms to improve osteoporotic fracture risk prediction in women when complete FRAX parameter information is unavailable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Family Medicine
Korean Journal of Family Medicine PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
51
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信