使用阿米替林时心电图上的 QTc 缩短可能表明对缓解烧灼感口腔综合征的疼痛没有影响。

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Clinical Neuropharmacology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-30 DOI:10.1097/WNF.0000000000000583
Takahiko Nagamine, Takeshi Watanabe, Akira Toyofuku
{"title":"使用阿米替林时心电图上的 QTc 缩短可能表明对缓解烧灼感口腔综合征的疼痛没有影响。","authors":"Takahiko Nagamine, Takeshi Watanabe, Akira Toyofuku","doi":"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is an intractable chronic pain disorder characterized by a burning sensation without organic abnormalities in the oral mucosa. Amitriptyline may be effective for BMS or, conversely, may exacerbate pain. QTc is necessary for monitoring psychotropic adverse effects, but it is not known if it is a predictor of efficacy for BMS. We investigated the efficacy of amitriptyline in BMS and its effect on QTc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Visual analog scale and electrocardiogram were examined before and 1 month after treatment in 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with BMS according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), criteria and treated with amitriptyline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26 amitriptyline responders and 25 nonresponders, with no differences in age, sex, and amitriptyline dosage. Amitriptyline responders showed little change in QTc, whereas nonresponders showed a trend toward significantly shorter QTc. Changes in visual analog scale correlated statistically significantly with changes in QTc (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0384; P = 0.0054). The degree of pain tended to worsen with QTc shortening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amitriptyline provides analgesia in about half of BMS patients, but some BMS patients have worse pain with amitriptyline. Not only do changes in the QTc detect amitriptyline adverse effects with prolongation, but also, conversely, its shortening predicts amitriptyline ineffectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":10449,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"33-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QTc Shortening on Electrocardiogram With Amitriptyline May Indicate No Effect on Pain Relief in Burning Mouth Syndrome.\",\"authors\":\"Takahiko Nagamine, Takeshi Watanabe, Akira Toyofuku\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WNF.0000000000000583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is an intractable chronic pain disorder characterized by a burning sensation without organic abnormalities in the oral mucosa. Amitriptyline may be effective for BMS or, conversely, may exacerbate pain. QTc is necessary for monitoring psychotropic adverse effects, but it is not known if it is a predictor of efficacy for BMS. We investigated the efficacy of amitriptyline in BMS and its effect on QTc.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Visual analog scale and electrocardiogram were examined before and 1 month after treatment in 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with BMS according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), criteria and treated with amitriptyline.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 26 amitriptyline responders and 25 nonresponders, with no differences in age, sex, and amitriptyline dosage. Amitriptyline responders showed little change in QTc, whereas nonresponders showed a trend toward significantly shorter QTc. Changes in visual analog scale correlated statistically significantly with changes in QTc (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0384; P = 0.0054). The degree of pain tended to worsen with QTc shortening.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Amitriptyline provides analgesia in about half of BMS patients, but some BMS patients have worse pain with amitriptyline. Not only do changes in the QTc detect amitriptyline adverse effects with prolongation, but also, conversely, its shortening predicts amitriptyline ineffectiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"33-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000583\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNF.0000000000000583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:烧灼感口腔综合征(BMS)是一种顽固性慢性疼痛疾病,其特征是口腔黏膜有烧灼感,但无器质性异常。阿米替林可能对 BMS 有效,反之则可能加重疼痛。QTc 是监测精神药物不良反应的必要指标,但它是否能预测 BMS 的疗效尚不清楚。我们研究了阿米替林对 BMS 的疗效及其对 QTc 的影响:方法:根据国际头痛疾病分类第三版(ICHD-3)标准,对连续 51 例诊断为 BMS 并接受阿米替林治疗的患者进行治疗前和治疗后 1 个月的视觉模拟量表和心电图检查:结果:阿米替林应答者 26 人,无应答者 25 人,年龄、性别和阿米替林剂量无差异。阿米替林应答者的 QTc 变化不大,而无应答者的 QTc 有明显缩短的趋势。视觉模拟量表的变化与 QTc 的变化有显著的统计学相关性(Spearman 等级相关系数:0384;P = 0.0054)。疼痛程度往往随着 QTc 的缩短而加重:结论:阿米替林可为大约一半的 BMS 患者提供镇痛效果,但一些 BMS 患者在使用阿米替林后疼痛加剧。QTc的变化不仅能发现阿米替林的不良反应,而且反之,QTc的缩短还能预测阿米替林的无效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
QTc Shortening on Electrocardiogram With Amitriptyline May Indicate No Effect on Pain Relief in Burning Mouth Syndrome.

Objective: Burning mouth syndrome (BMS) is an intractable chronic pain disorder characterized by a burning sensation without organic abnormalities in the oral mucosa. Amitriptyline may be effective for BMS or, conversely, may exacerbate pain. QTc is necessary for monitoring psychotropic adverse effects, but it is not known if it is a predictor of efficacy for BMS. We investigated the efficacy of amitriptyline in BMS and its effect on QTc.

Methods: Visual analog scale and electrocardiogram were examined before and 1 month after treatment in 51 consecutive patients diagnosed with BMS according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders, Third Edition (ICHD-3), criteria and treated with amitriptyline.

Results: There were 26 amitriptyline responders and 25 nonresponders, with no differences in age, sex, and amitriptyline dosage. Amitriptyline responders showed little change in QTc, whereas nonresponders showed a trend toward significantly shorter QTc. Changes in visual analog scale correlated statistically significantly with changes in QTc (Spearman rank correlation coefficient: 0384; P = 0.0054). The degree of pain tended to worsen with QTc shortening.

Conclusion: Amitriptyline provides analgesia in about half of BMS patients, but some BMS patients have worse pain with amitriptyline. Not only do changes in the QTc detect amitriptyline adverse effects with prolongation, but also, conversely, its shortening predicts amitriptyline ineffectiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropharmacology
Clinical Neuropharmacology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuropharmacology is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to the pharmacology of the nervous system in its broadest sense. Coverage ranges from such basic aspects as mechanisms of action, structure-activity relationships, and drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics, to practical clinical problems such as drug interactions, drug toxicity, and therapy for specific syndromes and symptoms. The journal publishes original articles and brief reports, invited and submitted reviews, and letters to the editor. A regular feature is the Patient Management Series: in-depth case presentations with clinical questions and answers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信