{"title":"卫生信息管理专业学生的工作一体化学习:从文献中汲取的教训,以及虚拟或远程实习的导师和学生的经验。","authors":"Natasha Prasad, Madeleine Maloof, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Merilyn Riley","doi":"10.1177/18333583241227002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, health placements have required practical in-person learning, including placements completed by health information management (HIM) students. COVID-19 made in-person healthcare placements largely unviable. Alternative virtual/remote placements were required.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) Explore the experiences of virtual/remote placements for HIM students and their supervisors; (2) Compare these experiences to the literature on barriers and facilitators for virtual/remote placement and (3) Develop best practice guidelines for the delivery of virtual/remote placements for HIM students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey asked final-year HIM placement students and their supervisors about their virtual/remote placement experiences in 2021. Survey findings were compared to 10 barriers and facilitators for remote/virtual placements identified in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students were challenged by autonomous virtual/remote placements but enjoyed their flexibility. A work schedule provides placement structure to students. The use of technology was embraced although unfamiliarity with video-conferencing software prior to placement was an issue for some students. The most common method of student-supervisor communication was email. However, students missed casual corridor conversations. The importance of maintaining a community of practice was reported in the literature and confirmed by students. Most students preferred undertaking a virtual/remote placement rather than delaying graduation. The majority of supervisors reported complete satisfaction with the placement students' performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual/remote placements were a viable option for HIM students when in-person placements were impossible. Students required a work-based schedule, appropriate information technology, a dedicated workspace, familiarity with communication technologies, good communication channels with their supervisors and a supportive 'community of practice'. HIM supervisors were satisfied with virtual/remote methods of placement delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73210,"journal":{"name":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","volume":" ","pages":"18333583241227002"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Work-integrated learning for health information management students: Lessons learned from literature, and experiences of supervisors and students on virtual or remote placements.\",\"authors\":\"Natasha Prasad, Madeleine Maloof, Stephanie Gjorgioski, Merilyn Riley\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/18333583241227002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traditionally, health placements have required practical in-person learning, including placements completed by health information management (HIM) students. COVID-19 made in-person healthcare placements largely unviable. Alternative virtual/remote placements were required.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>(1) Explore the experiences of virtual/remote placements for HIM students and their supervisors; (2) Compare these experiences to the literature on barriers and facilitators for virtual/remote placement and (3) Develop best practice guidelines for the delivery of virtual/remote placements for HIM students.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional survey asked final-year HIM placement students and their supervisors about their virtual/remote placement experiences in 2021. Survey findings were compared to 10 barriers and facilitators for remote/virtual placements identified in the literature.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students were challenged by autonomous virtual/remote placements but enjoyed their flexibility. A work schedule provides placement structure to students. The use of technology was embraced although unfamiliarity with video-conferencing software prior to placement was an issue for some students. The most common method of student-supervisor communication was email. However, students missed casual corridor conversations. The importance of maintaining a community of practice was reported in the literature and confirmed by students. Most students preferred undertaking a virtual/remote placement rather than delaying graduation. The majority of supervisors reported complete satisfaction with the placement students' performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Virtual/remote placements were a viable option for HIM students when in-person placements were impossible. Students required a work-based schedule, appropriate information technology, a dedicated workspace, familiarity with communication technologies, good communication channels with their supervisors and a supportive 'community of practice'. HIM supervisors were satisfied with virtual/remote methods of placement delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"18333583241227002\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241227002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/18333583241227002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:传统上,医疗实习要求学生亲自进行实践学习,包括由健康信息管理 (HIM) 学生完成的实习。COVID-19 使面对面的医疗实习基本不可行。目的:(1) 探讨健康信息管理专业学生及其导师的虚拟/远程实习经验;(2) 将这些经验与有关虚拟/远程实习的障碍和促进因素的文献进行比较;(3) 制定健康信息管理专业学生虚拟/远程实习的最佳实践指南:一项横向调查询问了 2021 年最后一年 HIM 实习学生及其导师的虚拟/远程实习经历。调查结果与文献中确定的远程/虚拟实习的 10 个障碍和促进因素进行了比较:结果:学生在自主虚拟/远程实习中遇到了挑战,但也享受到了其灵活性。工作时间表为学生提供了实习结构。虽然有些学生在实习前不熟悉视频会议软件是个问题,但技术的使用还是得到了欢迎。学生与导师之间最常用的交流方式是电子邮件。不过,学生们也很怀念走廊上的闲聊。文献报道了保持实践社区的重要性,学生们也证实了这一点。大多数学生倾向于进行虚拟/远程实习,而不是推迟毕业。大多数导师对实习学生的表现表示完全满意:虚拟/远程实习是 HIM 学生在无法亲自实习时的一种可行选择。学生需要一个基于工作的时间表、适当的信息技术、专用的工作空间、熟悉通信技术、与导师良好的沟通渠道以及一个支持性的 "实践社区"。HIM 主管对虚拟/远程实习方法表示满意。
Work-integrated learning for health information management students: Lessons learned from literature, and experiences of supervisors and students on virtual or remote placements.
Background: Traditionally, health placements have required practical in-person learning, including placements completed by health information management (HIM) students. COVID-19 made in-person healthcare placements largely unviable. Alternative virtual/remote placements were required.
Aims: (1) Explore the experiences of virtual/remote placements for HIM students and their supervisors; (2) Compare these experiences to the literature on barriers and facilitators for virtual/remote placement and (3) Develop best practice guidelines for the delivery of virtual/remote placements for HIM students.
Method: A cross-sectional survey asked final-year HIM placement students and their supervisors about their virtual/remote placement experiences in 2021. Survey findings were compared to 10 barriers and facilitators for remote/virtual placements identified in the literature.
Results: Students were challenged by autonomous virtual/remote placements but enjoyed their flexibility. A work schedule provides placement structure to students. The use of technology was embraced although unfamiliarity with video-conferencing software prior to placement was an issue for some students. The most common method of student-supervisor communication was email. However, students missed casual corridor conversations. The importance of maintaining a community of practice was reported in the literature and confirmed by students. Most students preferred undertaking a virtual/remote placement rather than delaying graduation. The majority of supervisors reported complete satisfaction with the placement students' performance.
Conclusion: Virtual/remote placements were a viable option for HIM students when in-person placements were impossible. Students required a work-based schedule, appropriate information technology, a dedicated workspace, familiarity with communication technologies, good communication channels with their supervisors and a supportive 'community of practice'. HIM supervisors were satisfied with virtual/remote methods of placement delivery.