回避还是不回避:自我同情对社交场合安全行为的影响。

IF 2.3 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Anxiety Stress and Coping Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1080/10615806.2024.2307466
Kamila A Szczyglowski, Nancy L Kocovski
{"title":"回避还是不回避:自我同情对社交场合安全行为的影响。","authors":"Kamila A Szczyglowski, Nancy L Kocovski","doi":"10.1080/10615806.2024.2307466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Safety behaviors are commonly used to decrease anxiety in social settings but maintain anxiety. Self-compassion has been shown to reduce anxiety and rumination, but the impact on safety behaviors has not been examined. For the present studies, it was hypothesized that inducing self-compassion would lead to lower safety behaviors compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 390), participants with elevated social anxiety recalled a distressing social situation, were randomly assigned to a self-compassionate (<i>n </i>= 186) or control (<i>n </i>= 204) writing exercise, and then reported predicted self-compassion and safety behaviors for a future situation. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 114), the impact of self-compassionate (<i>n </i>= 56) or control writing (<i>n</i> = 58) on safety behaviors was investigated during a Zoom interaction.</p><p><strong>Results/conclusions: </strong>In Study 1, as hypothesized, the self-compassion condition reported fewer expected avoidance behaviors compared to controls. In Study 2, state self-compassion and safety behaviors did not differ between conditions. In both studies, distress significantly mediated the relationship between condition and safety behaviors, such that the self-compassion condition reported significantly lower distress, which was associated with lower safety behaviors. Future research can examine whether reduced distress and safety behaviors allow for greater social connection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51415,"journal":{"name":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","volume":" ","pages":"587-601"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To avoid or not to avoid: impact of self-compassion on safety behaviors in social situations.\",\"authors\":\"Kamila A Szczyglowski, Nancy L Kocovski\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10615806.2024.2307466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Safety behaviors are commonly used to decrease anxiety in social settings but maintain anxiety. Self-compassion has been shown to reduce anxiety and rumination, but the impact on safety behaviors has not been examined. For the present studies, it was hypothesized that inducing self-compassion would lead to lower safety behaviors compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In Study 1 (<i>N</i> = 390), participants with elevated social anxiety recalled a distressing social situation, were randomly assigned to a self-compassionate (<i>n </i>= 186) or control (<i>n </i>= 204) writing exercise, and then reported predicted self-compassion and safety behaviors for a future situation. In Study 2 (<i>N</i> = 114), the impact of self-compassionate (<i>n </i>= 56) or control writing (<i>n</i> = 58) on safety behaviors was investigated during a Zoom interaction.</p><p><strong>Results/conclusions: </strong>In Study 1, as hypothesized, the self-compassion condition reported fewer expected avoidance behaviors compared to controls. In Study 2, state self-compassion and safety behaviors did not differ between conditions. In both studies, distress significantly mediated the relationship between condition and safety behaviors, such that the self-compassion condition reported significantly lower distress, which was associated with lower safety behaviors. Future research can examine whether reduced distress and safety behaviors allow for greater social connection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"587-601\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anxiety Stress and Coping\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2307466\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anxiety Stress and Coping","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2024.2307466","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:安全行为通常用于减少社交环境中的焦虑,但会维持焦虑。自我同情已被证明可以减少焦虑和反刍,但对安全行为的影响尚未进行研究。在本研究中,我们假设与对照组相比,诱导自我同情会导致较低的安全行为:在研究 1(N = 390)中,社交焦虑升高的参与者回忆了一个令人痛苦的社交情境,被随机分配到自我同情(n = 186)或对照组(n = 204)的写作练习中,然后报告预测的未来情境中的自我同情和安全行为。在研究 2(N = 114)中,调查了在 Zoom 互动中,自我同情(n = 56)或控制写作(n = 58)对安全行为的影响:在研究 1 中,正如假设的那样,与对照组相比,自我同情组报告的预期回避行为更少。在研究 2 中,自我同情状态和安全行为在不同条件下没有差异。在这两项研究中,困扰在很大程度上介导了状态与安全行为之间的关系,因此自我同情状态下的困扰明显较低,这与较低的安全行为有关。未来的研究可以探讨减少痛苦和安全行为是否能加强社会联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
To avoid or not to avoid: impact of self-compassion on safety behaviors in social situations.

Background/objectives: Safety behaviors are commonly used to decrease anxiety in social settings but maintain anxiety. Self-compassion has been shown to reduce anxiety and rumination, but the impact on safety behaviors has not been examined. For the present studies, it was hypothesized that inducing self-compassion would lead to lower safety behaviors compared to controls.

Methods: In Study 1 (N = 390), participants with elevated social anxiety recalled a distressing social situation, were randomly assigned to a self-compassionate (n = 186) or control (n = 204) writing exercise, and then reported predicted self-compassion and safety behaviors for a future situation. In Study 2 (N = 114), the impact of self-compassionate (n = 56) or control writing (n = 58) on safety behaviors was investigated during a Zoom interaction.

Results/conclusions: In Study 1, as hypothesized, the self-compassion condition reported fewer expected avoidance behaviors compared to controls. In Study 2, state self-compassion and safety behaviors did not differ between conditions. In both studies, distress significantly mediated the relationship between condition and safety behaviors, such that the self-compassion condition reported significantly lower distress, which was associated with lower safety behaviors. Future research can examine whether reduced distress and safety behaviors allow for greater social connection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: This journal provides a forum for scientific, theoretically important, and clinically significant research reports and conceptual contributions. It deals with experimental and field studies on anxiety dimensions and stress and coping processes, but also with related topics such as the antecedents and consequences of stress and emotion. We also encourage submissions contributing to the understanding of the relationship between psychological and physiological processes, specific for stress and anxiety. Manuscripts should report novel findings that are of interest to an international readership. While the journal is open to a diversity of articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信