N Krugliak Cleveland, N K Choi, J A Klein, E N Fear, Z D Fine, N M Garcia, E A Picker, S R Friedberg, R D Cohen, S R Dalal, J Pekow, D Choi, D T Rubin
{"title":"P465 Upadacitinib 用于治疗溃疡性结肠炎和克罗恩病既有效又安全:为期1年的前瞻性真实世界经验","authors":"N Krugliak Cleveland, N K Choi, J A Klein, E N Fear, Z D Fine, N M Garcia, E A Picker, S R Friedberg, R D Cohen, S R Dalal, J Pekow, D Choi, D T Rubin","doi":"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown efficacy and received approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We previously reported a large real-world experience of UPA induction in UC and CD (Friedberg, CGH. 2023). Here we report our 1-year real-world experience. Methods This is a prospectively collected study of clinical outcomes of UPA treatment in patients with UC and CD using predetermined intervals at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, then every 3 months until week 52 as part of a formalized treatment protocol at our institution. We used the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and the Harvey-Bradshaw index, as well as C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to assess efficacy, and also recorded treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. Results 110 patients were initiated on UPA and followed for a one-year period (CD=57, UC=44, IBDU=5, pouchitis=4). 109/110 (99%) were biologic exposed and 31/110 (28.2 %) were tofacitinib exposed. 99/110 (90%) were initiated on UPA for luminal disease (Table 1). 54 patients remained on UPA therapy at 1 year. In UC: week 8 clinical response and remission was 24/47 (51.1%), 39/47 (83%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 20/34 (58.8%), 24/34 (70.6%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 17/30 (56.7%), 29/30 (96.7%), respectively. In CD: week 8 clinical response and remission was 14/32 (43.8%), 25/32 (78.1%%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 9/22 (40.9%), 15/22 (68.2%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 10/17 (58.8%), 13/17 (76.5%), respectively. 56 patients discontinued UPA prior to the 1 year follow-up, 13 were due to adverse events[DR1] . The most commonly experienced AEs leading to discontinuation was dermatological side effects (CD=2, UC=2). One instance of shingles occurred leading to discontinuation. No other serious infections or serious adverse events including VTE, MACE, or malignancies occurred. Conclusion In this large 1-year real-world experience in medically resistant patients with UC or CD, we report that UPA is both effective and safe, including in those who had prior exposure to tofacitinib.","PeriodicalId":15453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P465 Upadacitinib is effective and safe for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: 1-year prospective real-world experience\",\"authors\":\"N Krugliak Cleveland, N K Choi, J A Klein, E N Fear, Z D Fine, N M Garcia, E A Picker, S R Friedberg, R D Cohen, S R Dalal, J Pekow, D Choi, D T Rubin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown efficacy and received approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We previously reported a large real-world experience of UPA induction in UC and CD (Friedberg, CGH. 2023). Here we report our 1-year real-world experience. Methods This is a prospectively collected study of clinical outcomes of UPA treatment in patients with UC and CD using predetermined intervals at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, then every 3 months until week 52 as part of a formalized treatment protocol at our institution. We used the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and the Harvey-Bradshaw index, as well as C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to assess efficacy, and also recorded treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. Results 110 patients were initiated on UPA and followed for a one-year period (CD=57, UC=44, IBDU=5, pouchitis=4). 109/110 (99%) were biologic exposed and 31/110 (28.2 %) were tofacitinib exposed. 99/110 (90%) were initiated on UPA for luminal disease (Table 1). 54 patients remained on UPA therapy at 1 year. In UC: week 8 clinical response and remission was 24/47 (51.1%), 39/47 (83%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 20/34 (58.8%), 24/34 (70.6%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 17/30 (56.7%), 29/30 (96.7%), respectively. In CD: week 8 clinical response and remission was 14/32 (43.8%), 25/32 (78.1%%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 9/22 (40.9%), 15/22 (68.2%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 10/17 (58.8%), 13/17 (76.5%), respectively. 56 patients discontinued UPA prior to the 1 year follow-up, 13 were due to adverse events[DR1] . The most commonly experienced AEs leading to discontinuation was dermatological side effects (CD=2, UC=2). One instance of shingles occurred leading to discontinuation. No other serious infections or serious adverse events including VTE, MACE, or malignancies occurred. Conclusion In this large 1-year real-world experience in medically resistant patients with UC or CD, we report that UPA is both effective and safe, including in those who had prior exposure to tofacitinib.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0595\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Crohn's and Colitis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad212.0595","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
P465 Upadacitinib is effective and safe for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease: 1-year prospective real-world experience
Background Upadacitinib (UPA) is a novel selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown efficacy and received approval for the treatment of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). We previously reported a large real-world experience of UPA induction in UC and CD (Friedberg, CGH. 2023). Here we report our 1-year real-world experience. Methods This is a prospectively collected study of clinical outcomes of UPA treatment in patients with UC and CD using predetermined intervals at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, then every 3 months until week 52 as part of a formalized treatment protocol at our institution. We used the Simple Clinical Colitis Activity Index and the Harvey-Bradshaw index, as well as C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin to assess efficacy, and also recorded treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. Results 110 patients were initiated on UPA and followed for a one-year period (CD=57, UC=44, IBDU=5, pouchitis=4). 109/110 (99%) were biologic exposed and 31/110 (28.2 %) were tofacitinib exposed. 99/110 (90%) were initiated on UPA for luminal disease (Table 1). 54 patients remained on UPA therapy at 1 year. In UC: week 8 clinical response and remission was 24/47 (51.1%), 39/47 (83%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 20/34 (58.8%), 24/34 (70.6%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 17/30 (56.7%), 29/30 (96.7%), respectively. In CD: week 8 clinical response and remission was 14/32 (43.8%), 25/32 (78.1%%), respectively; week 26 clinical response and remission was 9/22 (40.9%), 15/22 (68.2%), respectively; 52 week clinical response and remission was 10/17 (58.8%), 13/17 (76.5%), respectively. 56 patients discontinued UPA prior to the 1 year follow-up, 13 were due to adverse events[DR1] . The most commonly experienced AEs leading to discontinuation was dermatological side effects (CD=2, UC=2). One instance of shingles occurred leading to discontinuation. No other serious infections or serious adverse events including VTE, MACE, or malignancies occurred. Conclusion In this large 1-year real-world experience in medically resistant patients with UC or CD, we report that UPA is both effective and safe, including in those who had prior exposure to tofacitinib.