Barbara A. Reisner*, Melissa M. Kinkaid, Justin M. Pratt, Anne K. Bentley, Joanne L. Stewart, Sheila R. Smith, Jeffrey R. Raker and Shirley Lin,
{"title":"无机学生如何表示分子轨道?无机化学基础课程的多机构研究","authors":"Barbara A. Reisner*, Melissa M. Kinkaid, Justin M. Pratt, Anne K. Bentley, Joanne L. Stewart, Sheila R. Smith, Jeffrey R. Raker and Shirley Lin, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >This investigation of student and instructor representations of molecular orbitals (MOs) uses the knowledge from a community of practice to build collective pedagogical content knowledge of student understanding of molecular orbital representations in the foundation-level inorganic chemistry course. Participants were asked to sketch the bonding and antibonding MOs of a lithium hydride molecule. The student-generated images of MOs were analyzed and characterized according to five criteria: the atomic orbitals chosen, the sign of the wavefunction, the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. While most students correctly chose a basis set and accurately represented the sign of the wavefunction for the MOs, they were less successful at sketching the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. Students have an incomplete understanding of the information encoded in MO sketches and may not attribute meaning to these pictures in the same way that instructors may. These results suggest that instructors need to help students develop representational competence in order to achieve a more expert-like understanding of MO representations and to connect these depictions to the properties of molecules.</p>","PeriodicalId":43,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chemical Education","volume":"101 2","pages":"456–466"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Do Inorganic Students Represent Molecular Orbitals? A Multi-Institutional Study from the Foundation-Level Inorganic Chemistry Course\",\"authors\":\"Barbara A. Reisner*, Melissa M. Kinkaid, Justin M. Pratt, Anne K. Bentley, Joanne L. Stewart, Sheila R. Smith, Jeffrey R. Raker and Shirley Lin, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >This investigation of student and instructor representations of molecular orbitals (MOs) uses the knowledge from a community of practice to build collective pedagogical content knowledge of student understanding of molecular orbital representations in the foundation-level inorganic chemistry course. Participants were asked to sketch the bonding and antibonding MOs of a lithium hydride molecule. The student-generated images of MOs were analyzed and characterized according to five criteria: the atomic orbitals chosen, the sign of the wavefunction, the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. While most students correctly chose a basis set and accurately represented the sign of the wavefunction for the MOs, they were less successful at sketching the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. Students have an incomplete understanding of the information encoded in MO sketches and may not attribute meaning to these pictures in the same way that instructors may. These results suggest that instructors need to help students develop representational competence in order to achieve a more expert-like understanding of MO representations and to connect these depictions to the properties of molecules.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"volume\":\"101 2\",\"pages\":\"456–466\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chemical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00823\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chemical Education","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00823","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这项关于学生和教师对分子轨道(MO)表征的调查利用了来自实践社区的知识,以建立学生在无机化学基础课程中对分子轨道表征理解的集体教学内容知识。参与者被要求勾画氢化锂分子的成键和反键 MO。我们根据以下五个标准对学生绘制的 MO 图像进行了分析和鉴定:选择的原子轨道、波函数的符号、原子轨道对分子轨道的相对贡献、原子轨道的重叠以及 MO 的形状。虽然大多数学生正确地选择了基集,并准确地表示了MO的波函数符号,但他们在勾画原子轨道对分子轨道的相对贡献、原子轨道的重叠和MO的形状方面不太成功。学生对 MO 草图中编码的信息理解不全面,可能无法像教师那样赋予这些图片以意义。这些结果表明,教师需要帮助学生培养表象能力,以便使他们对MO表象有更专业的理解,并将这些描述与分子的性质联系起来。
How Do Inorganic Students Represent Molecular Orbitals? A Multi-Institutional Study from the Foundation-Level Inorganic Chemistry Course
This investigation of student and instructor representations of molecular orbitals (MOs) uses the knowledge from a community of practice to build collective pedagogical content knowledge of student understanding of molecular orbital representations in the foundation-level inorganic chemistry course. Participants were asked to sketch the bonding and antibonding MOs of a lithium hydride molecule. The student-generated images of MOs were analyzed and characterized according to five criteria: the atomic orbitals chosen, the sign of the wavefunction, the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. While most students correctly chose a basis set and accurately represented the sign of the wavefunction for the MOs, they were less successful at sketching the relative contribution of the atomic orbitals to the molecular orbitals, the overlap of atomic orbitals, and the shape of the MOs. Students have an incomplete understanding of the information encoded in MO sketches and may not attribute meaning to these pictures in the same way that instructors may. These results suggest that instructors need to help students develop representational competence in order to achieve a more expert-like understanding of MO representations and to connect these depictions to the properties of molecules.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Chemical Education is the official journal of the Division of Chemical Education of the American Chemical Society, co-published with the American Chemical Society Publications Division. Launched in 1924, the Journal of Chemical Education is the world’s premier chemical education journal. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed articles and related information as a resource to those in the field of chemical education and to those institutions that serve them. JCE typically addresses chemical content, activities, laboratory experiments, instructional methods, and pedagogies. The Journal serves as a means of communication among people across the world who are interested in the teaching and learning of chemistry. This includes instructors of chemistry from middle school through graduate school, professional staff who support these teaching activities, as well as some scientists in commerce, industry, and government.