抽取地下水对西班牙多纳纳世界遗产地造成了广泛的生态破坏

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Andy J. Green, Carolina Guardiola-Albert, Miguel Ángel Bravo-Utrera, Javier Bustamante, Antonio Camacho, Carlos Camacho, Eva Contreras-Arribas, José L. Espinar, Teresa Gil-Gil, Iván Gomez-Mestre, Javier Heredia-Díaz, Claus Kohfahl, Juan José Negro, Manuel Olías, Eloy Revilla, Patricia M. Rodríguez-González, Miguel Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Fernando Ruíz-Bermudo, Luis Santamaría, Guido Schmidt, José Antonio Serrano-Reina, Ricardo Díaz-Delgado
{"title":"抽取地下水对西班牙多纳纳世界遗产地造成了广泛的生态破坏","authors":"Andy J. Green, Carolina Guardiola-Albert, Miguel Ángel Bravo-Utrera, Javier Bustamante, Antonio Camacho, Carlos Camacho, Eva Contreras-Arribas, José L. Espinar, Teresa Gil-Gil, Iván Gomez-Mestre, Javier Heredia-Díaz, Claus Kohfahl, Juan José Negro, Manuel Olías, Eloy Revilla, Patricia M. Rodríguez-González, Miguel Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Fernando Ruíz-Bermudo, Luis Santamaría, Guido Schmidt, José Antonio Serrano-Reina, Ricardo Díaz-Delgado","doi":"10.1007/s13157-023-01769-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Acreman et al. (Wetlands 42:63, 2022) reviewed evidence for ecological damage to the Doñana wetlands (UNESCO World Heritage Site [WHS] and Ramsar site), Spain, associated with intensification of groundwater use, particularly for agriculture. Acreman et al. presented a multistep methodology for evidence-based risk assessment that involves identification of conservation issues, and a systematic review of scientific evidence for ecological damage and its causes. However, they involved few local scientists, used a questionable methodology in stakeholder selection and involvement, used a flawed conceptual framework, and an incomplete literature review. We propose improvements to their methodology. They overlooked or misinterpreted key evidence, and underestimated the impacts that abstraction for irrigation for red fruits (mainly strawberries), rice and other crops has had on Doñana and its biodiversity. They reported groundwater level depletion of up to 10 m in the deep aquifer, but wrongly concluded that there is no evidence for impacts on the natural marsh ecosystem, the dune ponds or the ecotone. Groundwater drawdowns are actually up to 20 m, and have inverted the formerly ascending vertical hydraulic gradient in discharge areas. Phreatic levels have been lowered from 0.5 to 2 m in some areas. Groundwater abstraction has caused multiple ecological impacts to temporary ponds and marshes in the WHS, as well as to terrestrial vegetation, and should be urgently reduced. Furthermore, Acreman et al. focused on groundwater quantity while overlooking the importance of severe impacts on quality of both surface and groundwater, intimately connected to the use of agrochemicals for irrigated crops.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Groundwater Abstraction has Caused Extensive Ecological Damage to the Doñana World Heritage Site, Spain\",\"authors\":\"Andy J. Green, Carolina Guardiola-Albert, Miguel Ángel Bravo-Utrera, Javier Bustamante, Antonio Camacho, Carlos Camacho, Eva Contreras-Arribas, José L. Espinar, Teresa Gil-Gil, Iván Gomez-Mestre, Javier Heredia-Díaz, Claus Kohfahl, Juan José Negro, Manuel Olías, Eloy Revilla, Patricia M. Rodríguez-González, Miguel Rodríguez-Rodríguez, Fernando Ruíz-Bermudo, Luis Santamaría, Guido Schmidt, José Antonio Serrano-Reina, Ricardo Díaz-Delgado\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13157-023-01769-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Acreman et al. (Wetlands 42:63, 2022) reviewed evidence for ecological damage to the Doñana wetlands (UNESCO World Heritage Site [WHS] and Ramsar site), Spain, associated with intensification of groundwater use, particularly for agriculture. Acreman et al. presented a multistep methodology for evidence-based risk assessment that involves identification of conservation issues, and a systematic review of scientific evidence for ecological damage and its causes. However, they involved few local scientists, used a questionable methodology in stakeholder selection and involvement, used a flawed conceptual framework, and an incomplete literature review. We propose improvements to their methodology. They overlooked or misinterpreted key evidence, and underestimated the impacts that abstraction for irrigation for red fruits (mainly strawberries), rice and other crops has had on Doñana and its biodiversity. They reported groundwater level depletion of up to 10 m in the deep aquifer, but wrongly concluded that there is no evidence for impacts on the natural marsh ecosystem, the dune ponds or the ecotone. Groundwater drawdowns are actually up to 20 m, and have inverted the formerly ascending vertical hydraulic gradient in discharge areas. Phreatic levels have been lowered from 0.5 to 2 m in some areas. Groundwater abstraction has caused multiple ecological impacts to temporary ponds and marshes in the WHS, as well as to terrestrial vegetation, and should be urgently reduced. Furthermore, Acreman et al. focused on groundwater quantity while overlooking the importance of severe impacts on quality of both surface and groundwater, intimately connected to the use of agrochemicals for irrigated crops.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01769-1\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01769-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Acreman 等人(Wetlands 42:63,2022 年)审查了西班牙多纳纳湿地(联合国教科文组织世界遗产地[WHS] 和拉姆萨尔湿地)因加强地下水使用,特别是农业用水而遭受生态破坏的证据。Acreman 等人提出了一种以证据为基础的多步骤风险评估方法,其中包括确定保护问题,以及对生态破坏及其原因的科学证据进行系统审查。但是,他们很少涉及当地科学家,在利益相关者的选择和参与方面使用了有问题的方法,使用了有缺陷的概念框架以及不完整的文献综述。我们建议改进他们的方法。他们忽略或曲解了关键证据,低估了抽取地下水灌溉红果(主要是草莓)、水稻和其他作物对多纳纳及其生物多样性的影响。他们报告说,深含水层的地下水位下降了 10 米,但却错误地得出结论,认为没有证据表明天然沼泽生态系统、沙丘池塘或生态区受到了影响。地下水的减少实际上高达 20 米,并使排泄区原来上升的垂直水力梯度倒置。一些地区的地下水位下降了 0.5 至 2 米。地下水的抽取对世界水文科学协会的临时池塘和沼泽地以及陆地植被造成了多重生态影响,亟需减少。此外,Acreman 等人只关注地下水的数量,却忽视了地表水和地下水质量受到严重影响的重要性,而这与灌溉作物时使用农用化学品密切相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Groundwater Abstraction has Caused Extensive Ecological Damage to the Doñana World Heritage Site, Spain

Groundwater Abstraction has Caused Extensive Ecological Damage to the Doñana World Heritage Site, Spain

Acreman et al. (Wetlands 42:63, 2022) reviewed evidence for ecological damage to the Doñana wetlands (UNESCO World Heritage Site [WHS] and Ramsar site), Spain, associated with intensification of groundwater use, particularly for agriculture. Acreman et al. presented a multistep methodology for evidence-based risk assessment that involves identification of conservation issues, and a systematic review of scientific evidence for ecological damage and its causes. However, they involved few local scientists, used a questionable methodology in stakeholder selection and involvement, used a flawed conceptual framework, and an incomplete literature review. We propose improvements to their methodology. They overlooked or misinterpreted key evidence, and underestimated the impacts that abstraction for irrigation for red fruits (mainly strawberries), rice and other crops has had on Doñana and its biodiversity. They reported groundwater level depletion of up to 10 m in the deep aquifer, but wrongly concluded that there is no evidence for impacts on the natural marsh ecosystem, the dune ponds or the ecotone. Groundwater drawdowns are actually up to 20 m, and have inverted the formerly ascending vertical hydraulic gradient in discharge areas. Phreatic levels have been lowered from 0.5 to 2 m in some areas. Groundwater abstraction has caused multiple ecological impacts to temporary ponds and marshes in the WHS, as well as to terrestrial vegetation, and should be urgently reduced. Furthermore, Acreman et al. focused on groundwater quantity while overlooking the importance of severe impacts on quality of both surface and groundwater, intimately connected to the use of agrochemicals for irrigated crops.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信