2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的预测因素。

Judy Z Louie, Dov Shiffman, Charles M Rowland, Norma S Kenyon, Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi, Michael J McPhaul, Rajesh Garg
{"title":"2 型糖尿病患者血糖控制不佳的预测因素。","authors":"Judy Z Louie, Dov Shiffman, Charles M Rowland, Norma S Kenyon, Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi, Michael J McPhaul, Rajesh Garg","doi":"10.1186/s40842-023-00160-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional guidelines recommend an HbA1c < 7% for most people with diabetes and < 8.5% for those with relaxed glycemic goals. However, many people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are unable to achieve the desired HbA1c goal. This study evaluated factors associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over 3 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with T2DM treated within a major academic healthcare system during 2015-2020, who had at least one HbA1c value > 8.5% within 3 years from their last HbA1c were included in analysis. Patients were grouped as improved glycemic control (last HbA1c ≤ 8.5%) or lack of improvement (last HbA1c > 8.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent predictors of lack of improvement in glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2,232 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 1,383 had an improvement in HbA1c while 849 did not. In the fully adjusted model, independent predictors of lack of improvement included: younger age (odds ratio, 0.89 per 1-SD [12 years]; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00), female gender (1.30, 1.08-1.56), presence of hypertension (1.29, 1.08-1.55), belonging to Black race (1.32, 1.04-1.68, White as reference), living in low income area (1.86,1.28-2.68, high income area as reference), and insurance coverage other than Medicare (1.32, 1.05-1.66). Presence of current smoking was associated with a paradoxical improvement in HbA1c (0.69, 0.47-0.99). In a subgroup analysis, comparing those with all subsequent HbA1c values > 8.5% (N = 444) to those with all subsequent HbA1c values < 8.5% (N = 341), similar factors were associated with lack of improvement, but smoking was no longer significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that socioeconomic factors like race, type of insurance coverage and living in low-income areas are associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over a period of 3-years in people with T2DM. Intervention strategies focused on low-income neighborhoods need to be designed to improve diabetes management.</p>","PeriodicalId":56339,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","volume":"10 1","pages":"2"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10809600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of lack of glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes.\",\"authors\":\"Judy Z Louie, Dov Shiffman, Charles M Rowland, Norma S Kenyon, Ernesto Bernal-Mizrachi, Michael J McPhaul, Rajesh Garg\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40842-023-00160-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional guidelines recommend an HbA1c < 7% for most people with diabetes and < 8.5% for those with relaxed glycemic goals. However, many people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are unable to achieve the desired HbA1c goal. This study evaluated factors associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over 3 years.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with T2DM treated within a major academic healthcare system during 2015-2020, who had at least one HbA1c value > 8.5% within 3 years from their last HbA1c were included in analysis. Patients were grouped as improved glycemic control (last HbA1c ≤ 8.5%) or lack of improvement (last HbA1c > 8.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent predictors of lack of improvement in glycemic control.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2,232 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 1,383 had an improvement in HbA1c while 849 did not. In the fully adjusted model, independent predictors of lack of improvement included: younger age (odds ratio, 0.89 per 1-SD [12 years]; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00), female gender (1.30, 1.08-1.56), presence of hypertension (1.29, 1.08-1.55), belonging to Black race (1.32, 1.04-1.68, White as reference), living in low income area (1.86,1.28-2.68, high income area as reference), and insurance coverage other than Medicare (1.32, 1.05-1.66). Presence of current smoking was associated with a paradoxical improvement in HbA1c (0.69, 0.47-0.99). In a subgroup analysis, comparing those with all subsequent HbA1c values > 8.5% (N = 444) to those with all subsequent HbA1c values < 8.5% (N = 341), similar factors were associated with lack of improvement, but smoking was no longer significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We conclude that socioeconomic factors like race, type of insurance coverage and living in low-income areas are associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over a period of 3-years in people with T2DM. Intervention strategies focused on low-income neighborhoods need to be designed to improve diabetes management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10809600/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-023-00160-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40842-023-00160-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专业指南推荐使用 HbA1c 方法:分析对象包括 2015-2020 年间在一家大型学术医疗系统接受治疗的所有 T2DM 患者,这些患者在距上次 HbA1c 测量的 3 年内至少有一次 HbA1c 值大于 8.5%。患者被分为血糖控制有改善(上次 HbA1c ≤ 8.5%)或无改善(上次 HbA1c > 8.5%)两组。对血糖控制未改善的独立预测因素进行了多变量逻辑回归分析:在符合纳入标准的 2,232 名患者中,1,383 人的 HbA1c 有改善,849 人没有改善。在完全调整模型中,血糖控制未改善的独立预测因素包括:年龄较小(几率比,0.89/1-SD [12岁];95% CI,0.79-1.00)、女性(1.30,1.08-1.56)、存在高血压(1.29,1.08-1.55)、属于黑人(1.32,1.04-1.68,以白人为参照)、生活在低收入地区(1.86,1.28-2.68,以高收入者为参照)以及除医疗保险以外的其他保险(1.32,1.05-1.66)。目前吸烟与 HbA1c 的改善相关(0.69,0.47-0.99)。在一项亚组分析中,将随后所有 HbA1c 值均大于 8.5%(N = 444)的患者与随后所有 HbA1c 值均小于 8.5%(N = 444)的患者进行了比较:我们得出的结论是,种族、保险类型和生活在低收入地区等社会经济因素与 T2DM 患者在 3 年内 HbA1c 没有改善有关。因此,需要制定针对低收入社区的干预策略,以改善糖尿病管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of lack of glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes.

Background: Professional guidelines recommend an HbA1c < 7% for most people with diabetes and < 8.5% for those with relaxed glycemic goals. However, many people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are unable to achieve the desired HbA1c goal. This study evaluated factors associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over 3 years.

Methods: All patients with T2DM treated within a major academic healthcare system during 2015-2020, who had at least one HbA1c value > 8.5% within 3 years from their last HbA1c were included in analysis. Patients were grouped as improved glycemic control (last HbA1c ≤ 8.5%) or lack of improvement (last HbA1c > 8.5%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to assess independent predictors of lack of improvement in glycemic control.

Results: Out of 2,232 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 1,383 had an improvement in HbA1c while 849 did not. In the fully adjusted model, independent predictors of lack of improvement included: younger age (odds ratio, 0.89 per 1-SD [12 years]; 95% CI, 0.79-1.00), female gender (1.30, 1.08-1.56), presence of hypertension (1.29, 1.08-1.55), belonging to Black race (1.32, 1.04-1.68, White as reference), living in low income area (1.86,1.28-2.68, high income area as reference), and insurance coverage other than Medicare (1.32, 1.05-1.66). Presence of current smoking was associated with a paradoxical improvement in HbA1c (0.69, 0.47-0.99). In a subgroup analysis, comparing those with all subsequent HbA1c values > 8.5% (N = 444) to those with all subsequent HbA1c values < 8.5% (N = 341), similar factors were associated with lack of improvement, but smoking was no longer significant.

Conclusion: We conclude that socioeconomic factors like race, type of insurance coverage and living in low-income areas are associated with lack of improvement in HbA1c over a period of 3-years in people with T2DM. Intervention strategies focused on low-income neighborhoods need to be designed to improve diabetes management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Diabetes and Endocrinology is an open access journal publishing within the field of diabetes and endocrine disease. The journal aims to provide a widely available resource for people working within the field of diabetes and endocrinology, in order to improve the care of people affected by these conditions. The audience includes, but is not limited to, physicians, researchers, nurses, nutritionists, pharmacists, podiatrists, psychologists, epidemiologists, exercise physiologists and health care researchers. Research articles include patient-based research (clinical trials, clinical studies, and others), translational research (translation of basic science to clinical practice, translation of clinical practice to policy and others), as well as epidemiology and health care research. Clinical articles include case reports, case seminars, consensus statements, clinical practice guidelines and evidence-based medicine. Only articles considered to contribute new knowledge to the field will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信