针对帕金森病及相关疾病的新型社区门诊姑息关怀干预措施能否改善护理?来自患者和护理伙伴的定性结果。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-24 DOI:10.1177/02692163231219923
Meredith A Bock, Zachary A Macchi, Krista L Harrison, Maya Katz, Megan Dini, Jacqueline Jones, Roman Ayele, Jean S Kutner, Steven Z Pantilat, Christine Martin, Stefan Sillau, Benzi Kluger
{"title":"针对帕金森病及相关疾病的新型社区门诊姑息关怀干预措施能否改善护理?来自患者和护理伙伴的定性结果。","authors":"Meredith A Bock, Zachary A Macchi, Krista L Harrison, Maya Katz, Megan Dini, Jacqueline Jones, Roman Ayele, Jean S Kutner, Steven Z Pantilat, Christine Martin, Stefan Sillau, Benzi Kluger","doi":"10.1177/02692163231219923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care has the potential to address significant unmet needs in people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders, but models that rely on in-person specialty palliative care teams have limited scalability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe patient and care partner experiences with a novel, community-based palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study embedded in a randomized clinical trial to document participant experiences with a novel palliative care intervention (community neurologist training and remote team-based specialist palliative care). Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed through a combination of team-based inductive and deductive coding.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-eight patients and 33 care partners purposively sampled from participants in a randomized clinical trial of a palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders conducted at nine sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benefits of the intervention included management of a wider range of non-motor symptoms, facilitation of conversations about the future, greater engagement with the health care team, and increased referrals to resources. Participants identified areas of improvement, including uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists, additional prognostic counseling, and clarity and timeliness of communication with the multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians caring for people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders should screen for non-motor symptoms, provide regular prognostic counseling, and refer to specialty palliative care services earlier in the course of illness. Future interventions should be designed to promote uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists and further optimize referral to and coordination with in-person or remote specialty palliative teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":19849,"journal":{"name":"Palliative Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does a novel community-based outpatient palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders improve care? Qualitative results from patients and care partners.\",\"authors\":\"Meredith A Bock, Zachary A Macchi, Krista L Harrison, Maya Katz, Megan Dini, Jacqueline Jones, Roman Ayele, Jean S Kutner, Steven Z Pantilat, Christine Martin, Stefan Sillau, Benzi Kluger\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02692163231219923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Palliative care has the potential to address significant unmet needs in people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders, but models that rely on in-person specialty palliative care teams have limited scalability.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To describe patient and care partner experiences with a novel, community-based palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Qualitative study embedded in a randomized clinical trial to document participant experiences with a novel palliative care intervention (community neurologist training and remote team-based specialist palliative care). Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed through a combination of team-based inductive and deductive coding.</p><p><strong>Setting/participants: </strong>Twenty-eight patients and 33 care partners purposively sampled from participants in a randomized clinical trial of a palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders conducted at nine sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Benefits of the intervention included management of a wider range of non-motor symptoms, facilitation of conversations about the future, greater engagement with the health care team, and increased referrals to resources. Participants identified areas of improvement, including uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists, additional prognostic counseling, and clarity and timeliness of communication with the multidisciplinary team.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinicians caring for people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders should screen for non-motor symptoms, provide regular prognostic counseling, and refer to specialty palliative care services earlier in the course of illness. Future interventions should be designed to promote uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists and further optimize referral to and coordination with in-person or remote specialty palliative teams.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10865748/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163231219923\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02692163231219923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:姑息关怀有可能解决帕金森病及相关疾病患者未得到满足的大量需求,但依赖于专科姑息关怀团队的模式可扩展性有限。目的:描述患者和护理伙伴对基于社区的新型帕金森病姑息关怀干预措施的体验:设计:将定性研究嵌入随机临床试验中,记录参与者对新型姑息关怀干预措施(社区神经科医生培训和远程团队专科姑息关怀)的体验。通过以团队为基础的归纳和演绎编码相结合的方法对记录誊本进行编码和主题分析:28名患者和33名护理伙伴是有目的性地从在9个地点进行的帕金森病及相关疾病姑息关怀干预随机临床试验的参与者中抽取的:结果:干预措施的益处包括控制更广泛的非运动症状、促进关于未来的对话、提高与医疗团队的互动以及增加资源转介。参与者指出了需要改进的地方,包括社区神经科医生接受姑息治疗培训、额外的预后咨询以及与多学科团队沟通的清晰性和及时性:护理帕金森病及相关疾病患者的临床医生应筛查非运动症状,定期提供预后咨询,并在病程早期转诊至专业姑息治疗服务机构。未来的干预措施应旨在促进社区神经科医生接受姑息关怀培训,并进一步优化转诊及与亲诊或远程姑息关怀专科团队的协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does a novel community-based outpatient palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders improve care? Qualitative results from patients and care partners.

Background: Palliative care has the potential to address significant unmet needs in people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders, but models that rely on in-person specialty palliative care teams have limited scalability.

Aim: To describe patient and care partner experiences with a novel, community-based palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease.

Design: Qualitative study embedded in a randomized clinical trial to document participant experiences with a novel palliative care intervention (community neurologist training and remote team-based specialist palliative care). Transcripts were coded and thematically analyzed through a combination of team-based inductive and deductive coding.

Setting/participants: Twenty-eight patients and 33 care partners purposively sampled from participants in a randomized clinical trial of a palliative care intervention for Parkinson's disease and related disorders conducted at nine sites.

Results: Benefits of the intervention included management of a wider range of non-motor symptoms, facilitation of conversations about the future, greater engagement with the health care team, and increased referrals to resources. Participants identified areas of improvement, including uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists, additional prognostic counseling, and clarity and timeliness of communication with the multidisciplinary team.

Conclusions: Clinicians caring for people with Parkinson's disease and related disorders should screen for non-motor symptoms, provide regular prognostic counseling, and refer to specialty palliative care services earlier in the course of illness. Future interventions should be designed to promote uptake of palliative care training by community neurologists and further optimize referral to and coordination with in-person or remote specialty palliative teams.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Palliative Medicine
Palliative Medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
125
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Palliative Medicine is a highly ranked, peer reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to improving knowledge and clinical practice in the palliative care of patients with far advanced disease. This outstanding journal features editorials, original papers, review articles, case reports, correspondence and book reviews. Essential reading for all members of the palliative care team. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信