说明在印第安纳波利斯(美国)2020 年春季内乱期间的公共安全医疗响应和遇到的病人情况。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-25 DOI:10.1017/S1049023X24000025
Thomas P Arkins, Mark Liao, Daniel O'Donnell, Nancy Glober, Gregory Faris, Elizabeth Weinstein, Michael W Supples, Julia Vaizer, Benton R Hunter, Thomas Lardaro
{"title":"说明在印第安纳波利斯(美国)2020 年春季内乱期间的公共安全医疗响应和遇到的病人情况。","authors":"Thomas P Arkins, Mark Liao, Daniel O'Donnell, Nancy Glober, Gregory Faris, Elizabeth Weinstein, Michael W Supples, Julia Vaizer, Benton R Hunter, Thomas Lardaro","doi":"10.1017/S1049023X24000025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response and patient encounters corresponding to the civil unrest occurring over a four-day period in Spring 2020 in Indianapolis, Indiana (USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study describes the non-conventional EMS response to civil unrest. The study included patients encountered by EMS in the area of the civil unrest occurring in Indianapolis, Indiana from May 29 through June 1, 2020. The area of civil unrest defined by Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department covered 15 blocks by 12 blocks (roughly 4.0 square miles) and included central Indianapolis. The study analyzed records and collected demographics, scene times, interventions, dispositions, EMS clinician narratives, transport destinations, and hospital course with outcomes from receiving hospitals for patients extracted from the area of civil unrest by EMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included with ages ranging from two to sixty-eight years. In total, EMS transported 72.4% (21 of 29) of the patients, with the remainder declining transport. Ballistic injuries from gun violence accounted for 10.3% (3 of 29) of injuries. Two additional fatalities from penetrating trauma occurred among patients without EMS contact within and during the civil unrest. Conditions not involving trauma occurred in 37.9% (11 of 29). Among transported patients, 33.3% (7 of 21) were admitted to the hospital and there was one fatality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most EMS transports did not result in hospitalization, it is important to note that the majority of EMS calls did result in a transport. There was a substantial amount of non-traumatic patient encounters. Trauma in many of the encounters was relatively severe, and the findings imply the need for rapid extraction methods from dangerous areas to facilitate timely in-hospital stabilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":20400,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"73-77"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Description of the Public Safety Medical Response and Patient Encounters Within and During the Indianapolis (USA) Spring 2020 Civil Unrest.\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P Arkins, Mark Liao, Daniel O'Donnell, Nancy Glober, Gregory Faris, Elizabeth Weinstein, Michael W Supples, Julia Vaizer, Benton R Hunter, Thomas Lardaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1049023X24000025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study describes the local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response and patient encounters corresponding to the civil unrest occurring over a four-day period in Spring 2020 in Indianapolis, Indiana (USA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study describes the non-conventional EMS response to civil unrest. The study included patients encountered by EMS in the area of the civil unrest occurring in Indianapolis, Indiana from May 29 through June 1, 2020. The area of civil unrest defined by Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department covered 15 blocks by 12 blocks (roughly 4.0 square miles) and included central Indianapolis. The study analyzed records and collected demographics, scene times, interventions, dispositions, EMS clinician narratives, transport destinations, and hospital course with outcomes from receiving hospitals for patients extracted from the area of civil unrest by EMS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine patients were included with ages ranging from two to sixty-eight years. In total, EMS transported 72.4% (21 of 29) of the patients, with the remainder declining transport. Ballistic injuries from gun violence accounted for 10.3% (3 of 29) of injuries. Two additional fatalities from penetrating trauma occurred among patients without EMS contact within and during the civil unrest. Conditions not involving trauma occurred in 37.9% (11 of 29). Among transported patients, 33.3% (7 of 21) were admitted to the hospital and there was one fatality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While most EMS transports did not result in hospitalization, it is important to note that the majority of EMS calls did result in a transport. There was a substantial amount of non-traumatic patient encounters. Trauma in many of the encounters was relatively severe, and the findings imply the need for rapid extraction methods from dangerous areas to facilitate timely in-hospital stabilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20400,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"73-77\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000025\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital and Disaster Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X24000025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:本研究描述了 2020 年春季在美国印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯发生的为期四天的民间骚乱中当地急救医疗服务(EMS)的响应情况和病人就诊情况:本研究描述了针对内乱的非常规急救服务响应。研究包括 2020 年 5 月 29 日至 6 月 1 日印第安纳州印第安纳波利斯发生内乱期间急救中心接诊的病人。印第安纳波利斯大都会警察局界定的内乱地区包括印第安纳波利斯市中心,面积为 15 个街区乘以 12 个街区(约 4.0 平方英里)。研究对记录进行了分析,并收集了急救医疗服务从内乱地区救出的患者的人口统计数据、现场时间、干预措施、处置、急救医疗服务临床医生的叙述、转运目的地、住院过程以及接收医院的结果:共纳入 29 名患者,年龄从 2 岁到 68 岁不等。急救服务共运送了 72.4% 的患者(29 人中的 21 人),其余患者拒绝运送。枪支暴力造成的弹道伤害占 10.3%(29 人中有 3 人)。在内乱期间和内乱期间未与急救中心联系的患者中,另有 2 人死于穿透性创伤。37.9%的患者(29 人中有 11 人)不涉及外伤。在被转运的病人中,33.3%(21 人中有 7 人)入院治疗,其中 1 人死亡:结论:虽然大多数紧急医疗服务转运并未导致住院治疗,但值得注意的是,大多数紧急医疗服务呼叫确实导致了转运。有大量的非创伤性病人就诊。在许多情况下,创伤都相对严重,这些发现意味着需要从危险区域快速撤离的方法,以促进及时的院内稳定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Description of the Public Safety Medical Response and Patient Encounters Within and During the Indianapolis (USA) Spring 2020 Civil Unrest.

Objective: This study describes the local Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response and patient encounters corresponding to the civil unrest occurring over a four-day period in Spring 2020 in Indianapolis, Indiana (USA).

Methods: This study describes the non-conventional EMS response to civil unrest. The study included patients encountered by EMS in the area of the civil unrest occurring in Indianapolis, Indiana from May 29 through June 1, 2020. The area of civil unrest defined by Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department covered 15 blocks by 12 blocks (roughly 4.0 square miles) and included central Indianapolis. The study analyzed records and collected demographics, scene times, interventions, dispositions, EMS clinician narratives, transport destinations, and hospital course with outcomes from receiving hospitals for patients extracted from the area of civil unrest by EMS.

Results: Twenty-nine patients were included with ages ranging from two to sixty-eight years. In total, EMS transported 72.4% (21 of 29) of the patients, with the remainder declining transport. Ballistic injuries from gun violence accounted for 10.3% (3 of 29) of injuries. Two additional fatalities from penetrating trauma occurred among patients without EMS contact within and during the civil unrest. Conditions not involving trauma occurred in 37.9% (11 of 29). Among transported patients, 33.3% (7 of 21) were admitted to the hospital and there was one fatality.

Conclusions: While most EMS transports did not result in hospitalization, it is important to note that the majority of EMS calls did result in a transport. There was a substantial amount of non-traumatic patient encounters. Trauma in many of the encounters was relatively severe, and the findings imply the need for rapid extraction methods from dangerous areas to facilitate timely in-hospital stabilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.60%
发文量
279
期刊介绍: Prehospital and Disaster Medicine (PDM) is an official publication of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine. Currently in its 25th volume, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine is one of the leading scientific journals focusing on prehospital and disaster health. It is the only peer-reviewed international journal in its field, published bi-monthly, providing a readable, usable worldwide source of research and analysis. PDM is currently distributed in more than 55 countries. Its readership includes physicians, professors, EMTs and paramedics, nurses, emergency managers, disaster planners, hospital administrators, sociologists, and psychologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信