结直肠肝转移瘤肝脏先入法的教科书成果:前瞻性多中心分析。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123
José M Ramia, Celia Villodre-Tudela, Laia Falgueras-Verdaguer, Natalia Zambudio-Carroll, José T Castell-Gómez, Silvia Carbonell-Morote, Juan L Blas-Laina, Vicente Borrego-Estella, Belinda Sánchez-Pérez, Mario Serradilla-Martín
{"title":"结直肠肝转移瘤肝脏先入法的教科书成果:前瞻性多中心分析。","authors":"José M Ramia, Celia Villodre-Tudela, Laia Falgueras-Verdaguer, Natalia Zambudio-Carroll, José T Castell-Gómez, Silvia Carbonell-Morote, Juan L Blas-Laina, Vicente Borrego-Estella, Belinda Sánchez-Pérez, Mario Serradilla-Martín","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is a valuable tool for assessing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse textbook-outcome rates in the prospective Spanish National Registry of the Liver-First Approach (RENACI Project) and the factors influencing textbook-outcome achievement. Additionally, a model for assessing a procedure-specific textbook outcome for the liver-first approach was proposed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a prospective and multicentre database that included consecutive patients with colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastases who underwent a liver-first approach between June 2019 and August 2020 was performed. Two types of textbook outcome were measured: classic textbook outcome and liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome (which included negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative major surgical complications, no prolonged length of hospital stay, no readmissions, no mortality, and full treatment completion). The primary endpoint was textbook-outcome rate for a liver-first approach at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 patients were included in the analysis. Classic and liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome rates were 71.8 per cent (107 patients) and 46 per cent (69 patients) respectively. Factors significantly associated with liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement in the multivariable analysis were the number of metastases (OR 0.82 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.92); P = 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99 to 1.00); P = 0.007). Prolonged length of hospital stay (33 patients, 41 per cent), positive margins (31 patients, 39 per cent), perioperative transfusion (27 patients, 34 per cent), and no full treatment completion (18 patients, 23 per cent) were the items that most frequently prevented liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome is a promising tool for measuring the quality of care when using the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Textbook outcomes in the liver-first approach for colorectal liver metastases: prospective multicentre analysis.\",\"authors\":\"José M Ramia, Celia Villodre-Tudela, Laia Falgueras-Verdaguer, Natalia Zambudio-Carroll, José T Castell-Gómez, Silvia Carbonell-Morote, Juan L Blas-Laina, Vicente Borrego-Estella, Belinda Sánchez-Pérez, Mario Serradilla-Martín\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Textbook outcome is a valuable tool for assessing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse textbook-outcome rates in the prospective Spanish National Registry of the Liver-First Approach (RENACI Project) and the factors influencing textbook-outcome achievement. Additionally, a model for assessing a procedure-specific textbook outcome for the liver-first approach was proposed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of a prospective and multicentre database that included consecutive patients with colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastases who underwent a liver-first approach between June 2019 and August 2020 was performed. Two types of textbook outcome were measured: classic textbook outcome and liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome (which included negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative major surgical complications, no prolonged length of hospital stay, no readmissions, no mortality, and full treatment completion). The primary endpoint was textbook-outcome rate for a liver-first approach at 90 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 149 patients were included in the analysis. Classic and liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome rates were 71.8 per cent (107 patients) and 46 per cent (69 patients) respectively. Factors significantly associated with liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement in the multivariable analysis were the number of metastases (OR 0.82 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.92); P = 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99 to 1.00); P = 0.007). Prolonged length of hospital stay (33 patients, 41 per cent), positive margins (31 patients, 39 per cent), perioperative transfusion (27 patients, 34 per cent), and no full treatment completion (18 patients, 23 per cent) were the items that most frequently prevented liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome is a promising tool for measuring the quality of care when using the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BJS Open\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10807998/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BJS Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrad123","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:教科书结果是评估手术结果的重要工具。本研究旨在分析前瞻性西班牙国家肝脏先入路登记处(RENACI 项目)的教科书结果率以及影响教科书结果的因素。此外,还提出了一个评估肝脏先入路手术特定术式教科书结果的模型:对一个前瞻性多中心数据库进行了回顾性分析,该数据库包括在2019年6月至2020年8月期间接受肝脏先入路手术的结直肠癌和同步肝转移的连续患者。测量了两种教科书结果:经典教科书结果和肝脏先入路特异性教科书结果(包括边缘阴性、围手术期无输血、术后无主要手术并发症、无住院时间延长、无再入院、无死亡和治疗全部完成)。主要终点是90天后肝脏先入路的教科书结果率:共有 149 名患者纳入分析。传统方法和肝脏先入方法的教科书得出结果率分别为 71.8%(107 名患者)和 46%(69 名患者)。在多变量分析中,与肝脏先入路特异性教科书结果达成率明显相关的因素是转移灶数量(OR 0.82(95% 置信区间为 0.73 至 0.92);P = 0.001)和术中失血量(OR 0.99(95% 置信区间为 0.99 至 1.00);P = 0.007)。住院时间延长(33 例患者,41%)、边缘阳性(31 例患者,39%)、围手术期输血(27 例患者,34%)和未完成全部治疗(18 例患者,23%)是最常妨碍实现肝脏先入路手术特定教科书结果的项目:结论:肝脏先入路特异性教科书结果是一种很有前途的工具,可用于衡量采用肝脏先入路方法治疗同步性结直肠肝转移的护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Textbook outcomes in the liver-first approach for colorectal liver metastases: prospective multicentre analysis.

Background: Textbook outcome is a valuable tool for assessing surgical outcomes. The aim of this study was to analyse textbook-outcome rates in the prospective Spanish National Registry of the Liver-First Approach (RENACI Project) and the factors influencing textbook-outcome achievement. Additionally, a model for assessing a procedure-specific textbook outcome for the liver-first approach was proposed.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospective and multicentre database that included consecutive patients with colorectal cancers and synchronous liver metastases who underwent a liver-first approach between June 2019 and August 2020 was performed. Two types of textbook outcome were measured: classic textbook outcome and liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome (which included negative margins, no perioperative transfusion, no postoperative major surgical complications, no prolonged length of hospital stay, no readmissions, no mortality, and full treatment completion). The primary endpoint was textbook-outcome rate for a liver-first approach at 90 days.

Results: A total of 149 patients were included in the analysis. Classic and liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome rates were 71.8 per cent (107 patients) and 46 per cent (69 patients) respectively. Factors significantly associated with liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement in the multivariable analysis were the number of metastases (OR 0.82 (95 per cent c.i. 0.73 to 0.92); P = 0.001) and intraoperative blood loss (OR 0.99 (95 per cent c.i. 0.99 to 1.00); P = 0.007). Prolonged length of hospital stay (33 patients, 41 per cent), positive margins (31 patients, 39 per cent), perioperative transfusion (27 patients, 34 per cent), and no full treatment completion (18 patients, 23 per cent) were the items that most frequently prevented liver-first-approach-specific textbook-outcome achievement.

Conclusion: Liver-first-approach-specific textbook outcome is a promising tool for measuring the quality of care when using the liver-first approach for synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信