{"title":"利用维多利亚州急诊最低数据集研究急诊科在预先护理指示和医疗决策方面的做法。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2024.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Existence of Advance Care Planning<span><span> (ACP) documents including contact details of Medical Treatment Decision Makers (MTDM), are essential patient care records that support </span>Emergency Department (ED) clinicians in implementing treatment concordant with patients’ expressed wishes. Based upon previous findings, we conducted a statewide study to evaluate the performance of Victorian public hospital emergency departments on reporting of availability of records for ACP.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study is a quantitative retrospective observational comparative design based upon ED tier levels as defined by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) for the calendar year 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1.8 million total Victorian ED attendances, 15,222 patients had an ACP alert status recorded. Of these, 7296 were aged ≥ 65 years (study group). Of the thirty-one public EDs that submitted data, 65 % were accredited and assigned a level of service tier. The presence of ACP alerts positively correlated to location, tier level, age and gender (MANOVA wilk’s; p < 0.001, value=.981, F = (12, 15,300), partial ƞ<sup>2</sup> = .006, observed power = 1.0 = 95.919).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The identified rate of ACP reporting is low. Strategies to improve the result include synchronising ACP (generated at different points) electronically, staff education, training and further validation of the data at the sending and receiving agencies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":"27 3","pages":"Pages 155-160"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining emergency departments practices on advance care directives and medical treatment decision making using the victorian emergency minimum dataset\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.auec.2024.01.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Existence of Advance Care Planning<span><span> (ACP) documents including contact details of Medical Treatment Decision Makers (MTDM), are essential patient care records that support </span>Emergency Department (ED) clinicians in implementing treatment concordant with patients’ expressed wishes. Based upon previous findings, we conducted a statewide study to evaluate the performance of Victorian public hospital emergency departments on reporting of availability of records for ACP.</span></p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>The study is a quantitative retrospective observational comparative design based upon ED tier levels as defined by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) for the calendar year 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 1.8 million total Victorian ED attendances, 15,222 patients had an ACP alert status recorded. Of these, 7296 were aged ≥ 65 years (study group). Of the thirty-one public EDs that submitted data, 65 % were accredited and assigned a level of service tier. The presence of ACP alerts positively correlated to location, tier level, age and gender (MANOVA wilk’s; p < 0.001, value=.981, F = (12, 15,300), partial ƞ<sup>2</sup> = .006, observed power = 1.0 = 95.919).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The identified rate of ACP reporting is low. Strategies to improve the result include synchronising ACP (generated at different points) electronically, staff education, training and further validation of the data at the sending and receiving agencies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"volume\":\"27 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 155-160\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Emergency Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X24000010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X24000010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining emergency departments practices on advance care directives and medical treatment decision making using the victorian emergency minimum dataset
Introduction
Existence of Advance Care Planning (ACP) documents including contact details of Medical Treatment Decision Makers (MTDM), are essential patient care records that support Emergency Department (ED) clinicians in implementing treatment concordant with patients’ expressed wishes. Based upon previous findings, we conducted a statewide study to evaluate the performance of Victorian public hospital emergency departments on reporting of availability of records for ACP.
Method
The study is a quantitative retrospective observational comparative design based upon ED tier levels as defined by the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) for the calendar year 2021.
Results
Of 1.8 million total Victorian ED attendances, 15,222 patients had an ACP alert status recorded. Of these, 7296 were aged ≥ 65 years (study group). Of the thirty-one public EDs that submitted data, 65 % were accredited and assigned a level of service tier. The presence of ACP alerts positively correlated to location, tier level, age and gender (MANOVA wilk’s; p < 0.001, value=.981, F = (12, 15,300), partial ƞ2 = .006, observed power = 1.0 = 95.919).
Conclusion
The identified rate of ACP reporting is low. Strategies to improve the result include synchronising ACP (generated at different points) electronically, staff education, training and further validation of the data at the sending and receiving agencies.
期刊介绍:
Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.