患有阅读障碍的高功能成人阅读网络的非典型半球重组:表象相似性分析的证据

Eddy Cavalli, V. Chanoine, Yufei Tan, Jean-Luc Anton, Bruno L. Giordano, Felipe Pegado, Johannes C. Ziegler
{"title":"患有阅读障碍的高功能成人阅读网络的非典型半球重组:表象相似性分析的证据","authors":"Eddy Cavalli, V. Chanoine, Yufei Tan, Jean-Luc Anton, Bruno L. Giordano, Felipe Pegado, Johannes C. Ziegler","doi":"10.1162/imag_a_00070","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract It has been argued that university students with dyslexia compensate for their reading deficits by a neural re-organization of the typical reading network, where the lexical representations of words are (re-)structured according to semantic rather than orthographic information. To investigate the re-organization of neural word representations more directly, we used multivariate representational similarity analyses (RSA) to find out which brain regions of the reading network respond to orthographic and semantic similarity between 544 pairs of words and whether there were any differences between typical and dyslexic readers. In accordance with the re-organization hypothesis, we predicted greater similarity (i.e., correlation of neural dissimilarity matrices) in adult dyslexic than in typical readers in regions associated with semantic processing and weaker similarity in regions associated with orthographic processing. Our results did not confirm these predictions. First, we found sensitivity to semantic similarity in all three subparts of the fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) bilaterally. Adults with dyslexia showed less (rather than more) sensitivity to semantic similarity in the posterior subpart of fusiform gyrus (FG1) in the left hemisphere. Second, in typical readers, sensitivity to orthographic information was not only found in the left fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) but also in left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Adults with dyslexia, in contrast, did not show sensitivity to orthographic information in left IFG. However, they showed increased sensitivity to orthographic information in the right hemisphere FG1. Together, the results show abnormal orthographic processing in left IFG and right FG1 and reduced semantic information in left FG1. While we found evidence for compensatory re-organization in adult dyslexia, the present results do not support the hypothesis according to which adults with dyslexia rely more heavily on semantic information. Instead, they revealed atypical hemispheric organization of the reading network that is not restricted to the typical left language hemisphere.","PeriodicalId":507939,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Neuroscience","volume":"25 14","pages":"1-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Atypical hemispheric re-organization of the reading network in high-functioning adults with dyslexia: Evidence from representational similarity analysis\",\"authors\":\"Eddy Cavalli, V. Chanoine, Yufei Tan, Jean-Luc Anton, Bruno L. Giordano, Felipe Pegado, Johannes C. Ziegler\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/imag_a_00070\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract It has been argued that university students with dyslexia compensate for their reading deficits by a neural re-organization of the typical reading network, where the lexical representations of words are (re-)structured according to semantic rather than orthographic information. To investigate the re-organization of neural word representations more directly, we used multivariate representational similarity analyses (RSA) to find out which brain regions of the reading network respond to orthographic and semantic similarity between 544 pairs of words and whether there were any differences between typical and dyslexic readers. In accordance with the re-organization hypothesis, we predicted greater similarity (i.e., correlation of neural dissimilarity matrices) in adult dyslexic than in typical readers in regions associated with semantic processing and weaker similarity in regions associated with orthographic processing. Our results did not confirm these predictions. First, we found sensitivity to semantic similarity in all three subparts of the fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) bilaterally. Adults with dyslexia showed less (rather than more) sensitivity to semantic similarity in the posterior subpart of fusiform gyrus (FG1) in the left hemisphere. Second, in typical readers, sensitivity to orthographic information was not only found in the left fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) but also in left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Adults with dyslexia, in contrast, did not show sensitivity to orthographic information in left IFG. However, they showed increased sensitivity to orthographic information in the right hemisphere FG1. Together, the results show abnormal orthographic processing in left IFG and right FG1 and reduced semantic information in left FG1. While we found evidence for compensatory re-organization in adult dyslexia, the present results do not support the hypothesis according to which adults with dyslexia rely more heavily on semantic information. Instead, they revealed atypical hemispheric organization of the reading network that is not restricted to the typical left language hemisphere.\",\"PeriodicalId\":507939,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"25 14\",\"pages\":\"1-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00070\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/imag_a_00070","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 有一种观点认为,患有阅读障碍的大学生通过对典型阅读网络进行神经重组来弥补其阅读缺陷,即根据语义而非正字法信息(重新)构建词汇表征。为了更直接地研究神经单词表征的重组,我们使用了多变量表征相似性分析(RSA),以找出阅读网络中哪些脑区会对 544 对单词的正字法和语义相似性做出反应,以及典型阅读障碍者和阅读障碍者之间是否存在差异。根据重组假说,我们预测成年阅读障碍患者在语义处理相关区域的相似性(即神经不相似矩阵的相关性)要高于典型阅读障碍患者,而在正字法处理相关区域的相似性要弱于典型阅读障碍患者。我们的研究结果并未证实这些预测。首先,我们在双侧纺锤形回的所有三个亚区(FG1、FG2 和 FG3)都发现了对语义相似性的敏感性。患有阅读障碍的成人左半球蝶状回后部(FG1)对语义相似性的敏感度较低(而非较高)。其次,在典型阅读者中,对正字法信息的敏感性不仅存在于左侧纺锤形回(FG1、FG2 和 FG3),还存在于左侧额叶下回(IFG)。相比之下,患有阅读障碍的成年人对左侧 IFG 中的正字法信息并不敏感。然而,他们对右半球 FG1 正字法信息的敏感度却有所提高。总之,这些结果表明左侧 IFG 和右侧 FG1 的正字法处理异常,而左侧 FG1 的语义信息减少。虽然我们发现了成人阅读障碍患者代偿性重组的证据,但目前的结果并不支持阅读障碍患者更依赖语义信息的假设。相反,它们揭示了阅读网络的非典型半球组织,而这种组织并不局限于典型的左侧语言半球。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Atypical hemispheric re-organization of the reading network in high-functioning adults with dyslexia: Evidence from representational similarity analysis
Abstract It has been argued that university students with dyslexia compensate for their reading deficits by a neural re-organization of the typical reading network, where the lexical representations of words are (re-)structured according to semantic rather than orthographic information. To investigate the re-organization of neural word representations more directly, we used multivariate representational similarity analyses (RSA) to find out which brain regions of the reading network respond to orthographic and semantic similarity between 544 pairs of words and whether there were any differences between typical and dyslexic readers. In accordance with the re-organization hypothesis, we predicted greater similarity (i.e., correlation of neural dissimilarity matrices) in adult dyslexic than in typical readers in regions associated with semantic processing and weaker similarity in regions associated with orthographic processing. Our results did not confirm these predictions. First, we found sensitivity to semantic similarity in all three subparts of the fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) bilaterally. Adults with dyslexia showed less (rather than more) sensitivity to semantic similarity in the posterior subpart of fusiform gyrus (FG1) in the left hemisphere. Second, in typical readers, sensitivity to orthographic information was not only found in the left fusiform gyrus (FG1, FG2, and FG3) but also in left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG). Adults with dyslexia, in contrast, did not show sensitivity to orthographic information in left IFG. However, they showed increased sensitivity to orthographic information in the right hemisphere FG1. Together, the results show abnormal orthographic processing in left IFG and right FG1 and reduced semantic information in left FG1. While we found evidence for compensatory re-organization in adult dyslexia, the present results do not support the hypothesis according to which adults with dyslexia rely more heavily on semantic information. Instead, they revealed atypical hemispheric organization of the reading network that is not restricted to the typical left language hemisphere.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信