供应链中绿色产品开发的生态标签战略选择

Gaoxiang Lou , Ying Zhang , Haicheng Ma , Xuechen Tu , Yi-Ming Wei
{"title":"供应链中绿色产品开发的生态标签战略选择","authors":"Gaoxiang Lou ,&nbsp;Ying Zhang ,&nbsp;Haicheng Ma ,&nbsp;Xuechen Tu ,&nbsp;Yi-Ming Wei","doi":"10.1016/j.susoc.2023.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In a supply chain where a supplier and a manufacturer engage in green innovation activities, we apply the Stackelberg game to investigate the influence of consumer trust and consumer green awareness on supply chain performance when employing self-labeling and certification label strategies. Our research delves into the optimal eco-label strategy through comparative analysis, resulting in the following key points: (1) Under the certification label strategy, the manufacturer and supply chain profits may decrease in consumer green awareness. (2) The manufacturer tends to choose self-labeling strategy, but the supplier has higher profits under certification label strategy. (3) The social welfare under the certification label is greater than that of self-labeling when the cost of certification and consumer trust are low. Further, we extend the certification label from single level to multi-level, and found that when the cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment is high, a high-level certification may be disadvantageous for the manufacturer. In addition, when consumer trust and cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment are both low, the manufacturer is more likely to preferentially choose multi-level certification label over self-labeling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101201,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","volume":"5 ","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412724000011/pdfft?md5=dd461acc856094ee76c52c05d4e817f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666412724000011-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eco-label strategy selection for green product development in supply chain\",\"authors\":\"Gaoxiang Lou ,&nbsp;Ying Zhang ,&nbsp;Haicheng Ma ,&nbsp;Xuechen Tu ,&nbsp;Yi-Ming Wei\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.susoc.2023.12.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In a supply chain where a supplier and a manufacturer engage in green innovation activities, we apply the Stackelberg game to investigate the influence of consumer trust and consumer green awareness on supply chain performance when employing self-labeling and certification label strategies. Our research delves into the optimal eco-label strategy through comparative analysis, resulting in the following key points: (1) Under the certification label strategy, the manufacturer and supply chain profits may decrease in consumer green awareness. (2) The manufacturer tends to choose self-labeling strategy, but the supplier has higher profits under certification label strategy. (3) The social welfare under the certification label is greater than that of self-labeling when the cost of certification and consumer trust are low. Further, we extend the certification label from single level to multi-level, and found that when the cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment is high, a high-level certification may be disadvantageous for the manufacturer. In addition, when consumer trust and cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment are both low, the manufacturer is more likely to preferentially choose multi-level certification label over self-labeling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Operations and Computers\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412724000011/pdfft?md5=dd461acc856094ee76c52c05d4e817f3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666412724000011-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Operations and Computers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412724000011\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Operations and Computers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666412724000011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在供应商和制造商共同参与绿色创新活动的供应链中,我们运用斯塔克尔伯格博弈研究了在采用自我标签和认证标签策略时,消费者信任和消费者绿色意识对供应链绩效的影响。我们的研究通过比较分析深入探讨了最优生态标签策略,得出以下要点:(1)在认证标签策略下,制造商和供应链的利润可能会随着消费者绿色意识的提高而降低。(2)制造商倾向于选择自我标签策略,但供应商在认证标签策略下有更高的利润。(3)当认证成本和消费者信任度较低时,认证标签下的社会福利大于自我标签下的社会福利。此外,我们将认证标签从单级扩展到多级,发现当制造商的绿色投资成本系数较高时,高级认证可能对制造商不利。此外,当消费者信任度和制造商绿色投资成本系数都较低时,制造商更倾向于选择多级认证标签而非自我标签。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eco-label strategy selection for green product development in supply chain

In a supply chain where a supplier and a manufacturer engage in green innovation activities, we apply the Stackelberg game to investigate the influence of consumer trust and consumer green awareness on supply chain performance when employing self-labeling and certification label strategies. Our research delves into the optimal eco-label strategy through comparative analysis, resulting in the following key points: (1) Under the certification label strategy, the manufacturer and supply chain profits may decrease in consumer green awareness. (2) The manufacturer tends to choose self-labeling strategy, but the supplier has higher profits under certification label strategy. (3) The social welfare under the certification label is greater than that of self-labeling when the cost of certification and consumer trust are low. Further, we extend the certification label from single level to multi-level, and found that when the cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment is high, a high-level certification may be disadvantageous for the manufacturer. In addition, when consumer trust and cost coefficient of manufacturer's green investment are both low, the manufacturer is more likely to preferentially choose multi-level certification label over self-labeling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信