计算机辅助学习改善学生学习的可推广证据:中国教育技术系统回顾

IF 4.1 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Cody Abbey , Yue Ma , Muizz Akhtar , Dorien Emmers , Robert Fairlie , Ning Fu , Hannah Faith Johnstone , Prashant Loyalka , Scott Rozelle , Hao Xue , Xinwu Zhang
{"title":"计算机辅助学习改善学生学习的可推广证据:中国教育技术系统回顾","authors":"Cody Abbey ,&nbsp;Yue Ma ,&nbsp;Muizz Akhtar ,&nbsp;Dorien Emmers ,&nbsp;Robert Fairlie ,&nbsp;Ning Fu ,&nbsp;Hannah Faith Johnstone ,&nbsp;Prashant Loyalka ,&nbsp;Scott Rozelle ,&nbsp;Hao Xue ,&nbsp;Xinwu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite the proliferation of education technologies (EdTech) in education, past reviews that examine their effectiveness in the context of low- and middle-income countries are few and rarely seek to include studies published in languages other than English. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of EdTech on primary and secondary student learning outcomes in China via a systematic search of both English- and Chinese-language databases. Eighteen (18) unique studies in 21 manuscripts on the effectiveness of EdTech innovations in China met the eligibility criteria. The majority of these evaluate computer aided self-led learning software packages designed to improve student learning (computer assisted learning, CAL), while the rest evaluate the use of EdTech to improve classroom instruction (ICI) and remote instruction (RI). The pooled effect size of all included studies indicates a small, positive effect on student learning (0.13 SD, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17]). CAL used a supplement to existing educational inputs – which made up the large majority of positive effect sizes – and RI programs consistently showed positive and significant effects on learning. Our findings indicate no significant differences or impacts on the overall effect based on moderating variables such as the type of implementation approach, contextual setting, or school subject area. Taken together, while there is evidence of the positive impacts of two kinds of EdTech (supplemental computer assisted learning and remote instruction) in China, more evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of other approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100322,"journal":{"name":"Computers and Education Open","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266655732400003X/pdfft?md5=b76f6540d3a38d2186303a45bdbc8a31&pid=1-s2.0-S266655732400003X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalizable evidence that computer assisted learning improves student learning: A systematic review of education technology in China\",\"authors\":\"Cody Abbey ,&nbsp;Yue Ma ,&nbsp;Muizz Akhtar ,&nbsp;Dorien Emmers ,&nbsp;Robert Fairlie ,&nbsp;Ning Fu ,&nbsp;Hannah Faith Johnstone ,&nbsp;Prashant Loyalka ,&nbsp;Scott Rozelle ,&nbsp;Hao Xue ,&nbsp;Xinwu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite the proliferation of education technologies (EdTech) in education, past reviews that examine their effectiveness in the context of low- and middle-income countries are few and rarely seek to include studies published in languages other than English. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of EdTech on primary and secondary student learning outcomes in China via a systematic search of both English- and Chinese-language databases. Eighteen (18) unique studies in 21 manuscripts on the effectiveness of EdTech innovations in China met the eligibility criteria. The majority of these evaluate computer aided self-led learning software packages designed to improve student learning (computer assisted learning, CAL), while the rest evaluate the use of EdTech to improve classroom instruction (ICI) and remote instruction (RI). The pooled effect size of all included studies indicates a small, positive effect on student learning (0.13 SD, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17]). CAL used a supplement to existing educational inputs – which made up the large majority of positive effect sizes – and RI programs consistently showed positive and significant effects on learning. Our findings indicate no significant differences or impacts on the overall effect based on moderating variables such as the type of implementation approach, contextual setting, or school subject area. Taken together, while there is evidence of the positive impacts of two kinds of EdTech (supplemental computer assisted learning and remote instruction) in China, more evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of other approaches.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266655732400003X/pdfft?md5=b76f6540d3a38d2186303a45bdbc8a31&pid=1-s2.0-S266655732400003X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers and Education Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266655732400003X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers and Education Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266655732400003X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管教育技术(EdTech)在教育领域的应用日益广泛,但以往研究教育技术在中低收入国家应用效果的综述却寥寥无几,而且很少涉及用英语以外的语言发表的研究。本系统性综述通过对英文和中文数据库的系统检索,调查了教育技术对中国中小学生学习成果的影响。共有 21 篇手稿中的 18 项关于中国教育技术创新效果的研究符合资格标准。其中大部分研究评估了旨在提高学生学习效果的计算机辅助自主学习软件包(计算机辅助学习,CAL),其余研究则评估了利用教育技术改善课堂教学(ICI)和远程教学(RI)的情况。所有纳入研究的综合效应大小表明,计算机辅助学习对学生的学习产生了微小的积极影响(0.13 SD,95% CI [0.10,0.17])。CAL 是对现有教育投入的补充--这占了正效应量的绝大部分--而 RI 计划则始终显示出对学习的正效应和显著效应。我们的研究结果表明,实施方法类型、背景环境或学校学科领域等调节变量对总体效果没有明显的差异或影响。综上所述,虽然有证据表明两种教育技术(辅助计算机辅助学习和远程教学)在中国产生了积极影响,但还需要更多证据来确定其他方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Generalizable evidence that computer assisted learning improves student learning: A systematic review of education technology in China

Despite the proliferation of education technologies (EdTech) in education, past reviews that examine their effectiveness in the context of low- and middle-income countries are few and rarely seek to include studies published in languages other than English. This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of EdTech on primary and secondary student learning outcomes in China via a systematic search of both English- and Chinese-language databases. Eighteen (18) unique studies in 21 manuscripts on the effectiveness of EdTech innovations in China met the eligibility criteria. The majority of these evaluate computer aided self-led learning software packages designed to improve student learning (computer assisted learning, CAL), while the rest evaluate the use of EdTech to improve classroom instruction (ICI) and remote instruction (RI). The pooled effect size of all included studies indicates a small, positive effect on student learning (0.13 SD, 95% CI [0.10, 0.17]). CAL used a supplement to existing educational inputs – which made up the large majority of positive effect sizes – and RI programs consistently showed positive and significant effects on learning. Our findings indicate no significant differences or impacts on the overall effect based on moderating variables such as the type of implementation approach, contextual setting, or school subject area. Taken together, while there is evidence of the positive impacts of two kinds of EdTech (supplemental computer assisted learning and remote instruction) in China, more evidence is needed to determine the effectiveness of other approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信