骶髂关节炎是诊断粘连性关节炎的硬性标准吗?

IF 1.2 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Hanene Lassoued Ferjani , Lobna Kharrat , Dorra Ben Nessib , Dhia Kaffel , Kaouther Maatallah , Wafa Hamdi
{"title":"骶髂关节炎是诊断粘连性关节炎的硬性标准吗?","authors":"Hanene Lassoued Ferjani ,&nbsp;Lobna Kharrat ,&nbsp;Dorra Ben Nessib ,&nbsp;Dhia Kaffel ,&nbsp;Kaouther Maatallah ,&nbsp;Wafa Hamdi","doi":"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.12.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA).</p><p>We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16 versus G2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</p><p>Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68–28.09; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47115,"journal":{"name":"Reumatologia Clinica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does sacroiliitis is a mandatory criterion for enthesitis-related arthritis diagnosis?\",\"authors\":\"Hanene Lassoued Ferjani ,&nbsp;Lobna Kharrat ,&nbsp;Dorra Ben Nessib ,&nbsp;Dhia Kaffel ,&nbsp;Kaouther Maatallah ,&nbsp;Wafa Hamdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.reuma.2023.12.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction and objectives</h3><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA).</p><p>We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->16 versus G2<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->3, <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.005).</p><p>Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68–28.09; <em>p</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reumatologia Clinica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X23002760\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reumatologia Clinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1699258X23002760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言和目标磁共振成像(MRI)的敏感性和特异性在关节炎相关性关节炎(ERA)中的研究似乎较少。我们旨在确定骶髂关节 MRI 诊断ERA 患者的能力。每位患者都进行了骶髂关节磁共振成像检查。我们将患者分为两组:结果 61%的病例发现ERA。15例患者(34%)骶髂关节疼痛。25 名患者(57%)(G1:11 对 G2:14)磁共振成像正常,19 名患者(34%)(G1 = 16 对 G2 = 3,P = 0.005)骶髂关节磁共振成像在 ERA 诊断中的敏感性和特异性分别为 61.54% 和 82.35%。骶髂关节磁共振成像对 ERA 诊断的敏感性和特异性分别为 61.54% 和 82.35%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 84.21% 和 58.33%。此外,临床检查中的骶髂关节疼痛能够预测 MRI 中的骶髂骨水肿,其几率比为 6.8 (95% CI 1.68-28.09; p = 0.006)。这凸显了骶髂关节磁共振成像在ERA患者早期诊断中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does sacroiliitis is a mandatory criterion for enthesitis-related arthritis diagnosis?

Introduction and objectives

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sensitivity and specificity seem to be less studied in enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA).

We aimed to determine the ability of sacroiliac MRI to diagnose ERA patients.

Materials and methods

We conducted a retrospective study including 44 patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA). Each patient had a sacroiliac joint MRI. We divided patients into two groups: G1 patients with ERA and G2 patients with non-ERA subtype.

Results

ERA was noted in 61% of the cases. Sacroiliac joints were painful in 15 patients (34%). MRI was normal in 25 patients (57%) (G1:11 versus G2:14) and showed bone marrow edema in the sacroiliac joints in 19 patients (34%) (G1 = 16 versus G2 = 3, p = 0.005).

Sacroiliac joints MRI's sensitivity and specificity in the ERA diagnosis were 61.54% and 82.35%, respectively. Positive and negative predictive values were 84.21% and 58.33%, respectively. Furthermore, sacroiliac joint pain in the clinical examination was able to predict sacroiliac bone edema in MRI with an odds ratio of 6.8 (95% CI 1.68–28.09; p = 0.006).

Conclusion

Our study showed that sacroiliac joint MRI has good specificity and positive predictive value in the diagnosis of ERA patients among JIA patients. This underlines the usefulness of sacroiliac joint MRI in the early diagnosis of ERA patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reumatologia Clinica
Reumatologia Clinica RHEUMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Una gran revista para cubrir eficazmente las necesidades de conocimientos en una patología de etiología, expresividad clínica y tratamiento tan amplios. Además es La Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Reumatología y del Colegio Mexicano de Reumatología y está incluida en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia en medicina.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信