欧盟人工智能法案》:规范前沿人工智能的开创性努力?

Guillem Bas, Claudette Salinas, Roberto Tinoco, Jaime Sevilla
{"title":"欧盟人工智能法案》:规范前沿人工智能的开创性努力?","authors":"Guillem Bas, Claudette Salinas, Roberto Tinoco, Jaime Sevilla","doi":"10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp55-64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emergence of increasingly capable artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about the potential extreme risks associated with them. The issue has drawn substantial attention in academic literature and compelled legislators of regulatory frameworks like the European Union AI Act (AIA) to readapt them to the new paradigm. This paper examines whether the European Parliament’s draft of the AIA constitutes an appropriate approach to address the risks derived from frontier models. In particular, we discuss whether the AIA reflects the policy needs diagnosed by recent literature and determine if the requirements falling on providers of foundation models are appropriate, sufficient, and durable. We find that the provisions are generally adequate, but insufficiently defined in some areas and lacking in others. Finally, the AIA is characterized as an evolving framework whose durability will depend on the institutions’ ability to adapt to future progress.","PeriodicalId":176050,"journal":{"name":"Inteligencia Artif.","volume":"56 8","pages":"55-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU AI Act: A pioneering effort to regulate frontier AI?\",\"authors\":\"Guillem Bas, Claudette Salinas, Roberto Tinoco, Jaime Sevilla\",\"doi\":\"10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp55-64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emergence of increasingly capable artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about the potential extreme risks associated with them. The issue has drawn substantial attention in academic literature and compelled legislators of regulatory frameworks like the European Union AI Act (AIA) to readapt them to the new paradigm. This paper examines whether the European Parliament’s draft of the AIA constitutes an appropriate approach to address the risks derived from frontier models. In particular, we discuss whether the AIA reflects the policy needs diagnosed by recent literature and determine if the requirements falling on providers of foundation models are appropriate, sufficient, and durable. We find that the provisions are generally adequate, but insufficiently defined in some areas and lacking in others. Finally, the AIA is characterized as an evolving framework whose durability will depend on the institutions’ ability to adapt to future progress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":176050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Inteligencia Artif.\",\"volume\":\"56 8\",\"pages\":\"55-64\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Inteligencia Artif.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp55-64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inteligencia Artif.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4114/intartif.vol27iss73pp55-64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

功能日益强大的人工智能(AI)系统的出现,引发了人们对与之相关的潜在极端风险的担忧。这一问题引起了学术文献的广泛关注,并迫使欧盟人工智能法案(AIA)等监管框架的立法者重新调整这些框架,以适应新的模式。本文探讨了欧洲议会的《人工智能法》草案是否是应对前沿模型风险的适当方法。特别是,我们讨论了《反垄断法》是否反映了近期文献中提出的政策需求,并确定了对基础模型提供者的要求是否适当、充分和持久。我们发现,这些规定总体上是充分的,但在某些方面定义不够明确,在另一些方面则有所欠缺。最后,AIA 被描述为一个不断发展的框架,其持久性将取决于各机构适应未来进步的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU AI Act: A pioneering effort to regulate frontier AI?
The emergence of increasingly capable artificial intelligence (AI) systems has raised concerns about the potential extreme risks associated with them. The issue has drawn substantial attention in academic literature and compelled legislators of regulatory frameworks like the European Union AI Act (AIA) to readapt them to the new paradigm. This paper examines whether the European Parliament’s draft of the AIA constitutes an appropriate approach to address the risks derived from frontier models. In particular, we discuss whether the AIA reflects the policy needs diagnosed by recent literature and determine if the requirements falling on providers of foundation models are appropriate, sufficient, and durable. We find that the provisions are generally adequate, but insufficiently defined in some areas and lacking in others. Finally, the AIA is characterized as an evolving framework whose durability will depend on the institutions’ ability to adapt to future progress.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信