马克斯-克林格的《贝多芬》(1902 年)、尼采的《超人类》以及 T.S. 艾略特的《科里奥兰 I》"凯旋进行曲"(1931 年)中的反法西斯诗学

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Aakanksha J. Virkar
{"title":"马克斯-克林格的《贝多芬》(1902 年)、尼采的《超人类》以及 T.S. 艾略特的《科里奥兰 I》\"凯旋进行曲\"(1931 年)中的反法西斯诗学","authors":"Aakanksha J. Virkar","doi":"10.2979/jml.00001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Eliot's Beethoven-inspired Coriolan I Triumphal March (1931) responds to and challenges the right-wing reception of Beethoven and Nietzsche in interwar Germany. Parodying the fascist interpretation of both composer and philosopher as military heroes, Eliot's poem instead invokes Beethoven in the idealist spirit of the Vienna Secession's 1902 Beethoven art exhibition. In particular, Triumphal March reveals itself as an ekphrastic response to Max Klinger's 1902 Beethoven sculpture, which portrayed the composer as a Promethean artist-hero aligned with Nietzsche's Übermensch. Resisting a militarist interpretation of Nietzsche's \"superman\" and a fascist discourse of Beethoven-Führer, Eliot follows Klinger's utopian vision of a \"Third Kingdom\" as suggesting peace, reconciliation, and inner transformation.","PeriodicalId":44453,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Max Klinger's Beethoven (1902), Nietzsche's Übermensch and the Anti-fascist Poetics of T.S. Eliot's Coriolan I \\\"Triumphal March\\\" (1931)\",\"authors\":\"Aakanksha J. Virkar\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/jml.00001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Eliot's Beethoven-inspired Coriolan I Triumphal March (1931) responds to and challenges the right-wing reception of Beethoven and Nietzsche in interwar Germany. Parodying the fascist interpretation of both composer and philosopher as military heroes, Eliot's poem instead invokes Beethoven in the idealist spirit of the Vienna Secession's 1902 Beethoven art exhibition. In particular, Triumphal March reveals itself as an ekphrastic response to Max Klinger's 1902 Beethoven sculpture, which portrayed the composer as a Promethean artist-hero aligned with Nietzsche's Übermensch. Resisting a militarist interpretation of Nietzsche's \\\"superman\\\" and a fascist discourse of Beethoven-Führer, Eliot follows Klinger's utopian vision of a \\\"Third Kingdom\\\" as suggesting peace, reconciliation, and inner transformation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/jml.00001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF MODERN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/jml.00001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:艾略特受贝多芬启发创作的《科里奥兰一世凯旋进行曲》(1931 年)回应并挑战了战时德国右翼对贝多芬和尼采的接受。艾略特的这首诗模仿了法西斯将作曲家和哲学家都诠释为军事英雄的做法,而是以维也纳分离派 1902 年贝多芬艺术展的理想主义精神来召唤贝多芬。尤其是,《凯旋进行曲》是对马克斯-克林格(Max Klinger)1902 年创作的贝多芬雕塑的抒情诗式回应,该雕塑将作曲家描绘成一个普罗米修斯式的艺术家英雄,与尼采的 "超我者"(Übermensch)相一致。艾略特抵制对尼采 "超人 "的军国主义诠释和贝多芬-元首的法西斯主义论述,他追随克林格对 "第三王国 "的乌托邦愿景,认为这意味着和平、和解与内心的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Max Klinger's Beethoven (1902), Nietzsche's Übermensch and the Anti-fascist Poetics of T.S. Eliot's Coriolan I "Triumphal March" (1931)
Abstract:Eliot's Beethoven-inspired Coriolan I Triumphal March (1931) responds to and challenges the right-wing reception of Beethoven and Nietzsche in interwar Germany. Parodying the fascist interpretation of both composer and philosopher as military heroes, Eliot's poem instead invokes Beethoven in the idealist spirit of the Vienna Secession's 1902 Beethoven art exhibition. In particular, Triumphal March reveals itself as an ekphrastic response to Max Klinger's 1902 Beethoven sculpture, which portrayed the composer as a Promethean artist-hero aligned with Nietzsche's Übermensch. Resisting a militarist interpretation of Nietzsche's "superman" and a fascist discourse of Beethoven-Führer, Eliot follows Klinger's utopian vision of a "Third Kingdom" as suggesting peace, reconciliation, and inner transformation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信