正畸后患者对使用哈雷和真空成型保持器的不同看法。第一部分:不适感和美感

Andina Alia Latief, B. Soegiharto, F. Jazaldi
{"title":"正畸后患者对使用哈雷和真空成型保持器的不同看法。第一部分:不适感和美感","authors":"Andina Alia Latief, B. Soegiharto, F. Jazaldi","doi":"10.1177/03015742231214391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Backgrounds and Objectives: The use of a retainer in the retention phase creates different perceptions amongst patients. However, the evidence regarding it is limited. This research was conducted to analyze the difference in patients&’ perception of discomfort and aesthetics between Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Methods: This study included 80 patients ( n per group = 40). Patients were invited to participate if they had completed their treatment for 6 months to 5 years and complied with the inclusion criteria. Seven questions were given to the patients using a digital-based questionnaire. Each was asked twice to address both maxillary and mandibular retainers. Responses were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Blinding was applied through data analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the perception of the aesthetic, shape, and retainer color. Statistically significant differences were not found in the perception of comfort, pain, sharpness, pressure, presence of soft tissue cut, and confidence level with the retainer in place. No harm was observed to any patients during the study. Conclusions: Vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) were more acceptable than Hawley retainers (HRs) regarding the retainer&’s aesthetic, shape, and color. There were no significant differences between HRs and VFRs regarding patient perception of discomfort and confidence when using the retainer.","PeriodicalId":31847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","volume":"17 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different Perception on the Use of Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers Amongst Post-orthodontic Patients. Part 1: Discomfort and Aesthetic Perception\",\"authors\":\"Andina Alia Latief, B. Soegiharto, F. Jazaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03015742231214391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Backgrounds and Objectives: The use of a retainer in the retention phase creates different perceptions amongst patients. However, the evidence regarding it is limited. This research was conducted to analyze the difference in patients&’ perception of discomfort and aesthetics between Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Methods: This study included 80 patients ( n per group = 40). Patients were invited to participate if they had completed their treatment for 6 months to 5 years and complied with the inclusion criteria. Seven questions were given to the patients using a digital-based questionnaire. Each was asked twice to address both maxillary and mandibular retainers. Responses were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Blinding was applied through data analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the perception of the aesthetic, shape, and retainer color. Statistically significant differences were not found in the perception of comfort, pain, sharpness, pressure, presence of soft tissue cut, and confidence level with the retainer in place. No harm was observed to any patients during the study. Conclusions: Vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) were more acceptable than Hawley retainers (HRs) regarding the retainer&’s aesthetic, shape, and color. There were no significant differences between HRs and VFRs regarding patient perception of discomfort and confidence when using the retainer.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"volume\":\"17 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231214391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03015742231214391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:在保持期使用保持器会在患者中产生不同的看法。然而,相关证据却很有限。本研究旨在分析患者对霍利保持器和真空成型保持器在不适感和美观度方面的差异。方法:本研究包括 80 名患者(每组 40 人)。如果患者已完成 6 个月至 5 年的治疗并符合纳入标准,则可受邀参加。研究人员使用数字式问卷向患者提出了七个问题。每个问题都针对上颌和下颌保持器提问两次。问卷采用视觉模拟量表进行测量。在数据分析过程中采用了盲法。结果在对美观、形状和保持器颜色的感知方面,发现了具有统计学意义的差异。在舒适度、疼痛感、尖锐感、压力感、软组织切割感和佩戴保持器后的信心水平方面,没有发现明显的统计学差异。研究期间没有发现对任何患者造成伤害。结论就保持器的美观、形状和颜色而言,真空成型保持器(VFR)比霍利保持器(HR)更容易被接受。在患者使用保持器时的不适感和自信心方面,HR 和 VFR 没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Different Perception on the Use of Hawley and Vacuum-formed Retainers Amongst Post-orthodontic Patients. Part 1: Discomfort and Aesthetic Perception
Backgrounds and Objectives: The use of a retainer in the retention phase creates different perceptions amongst patients. However, the evidence regarding it is limited. This research was conducted to analyze the difference in patients&’ perception of discomfort and aesthetics between Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers. Methods: This study included 80 patients ( n per group = 40). Patients were invited to participate if they had completed their treatment for 6 months to 5 years and complied with the inclusion criteria. Seven questions were given to the patients using a digital-based questionnaire. Each was asked twice to address both maxillary and mandibular retainers. Responses were measured using the Visual Analogue Scale. Blinding was applied through data analysis. Results: Statistically significant differences were found in the perception of the aesthetic, shape, and retainer color. Statistically significant differences were not found in the perception of comfort, pain, sharpness, pressure, presence of soft tissue cut, and confidence level with the retainer in place. No harm was observed to any patients during the study. Conclusions: Vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs) were more acceptable than Hawley retainers (HRs) regarding the retainer&’s aesthetic, shape, and color. There were no significant differences between HRs and VFRs regarding patient perception of discomfort and confidence when using the retainer.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信