操作风险工作组--验证操作风险模型

P. Kelliher, Madhu Acharyya, A. Couper, Edward N. V. Maguire, Choong A. Pang, C. Smerald, J. Sullivan, P. Teggin
{"title":"操作风险工作组--验证操作风险模型","authors":"P. Kelliher, Madhu Acharyya, A. Couper, Edward N. V. Maguire, Choong A. Pang, C. Smerald, J. Sullivan, P. Teggin","doi":"10.1017/S1357321723000168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Operational Risk is one of the most difficult risks to model. It is a large and diverse category covering anything from cyber losses to mis-selling fines; and from processing errors to HR issues. Data is usually lacking, particularly for low frequency, high impact losses, and consequently there can be a heavy reliance on expert judgement. This paper seeks to help actuaries and other risk professionals tasked with the challenge of validating models of operational risks. It covers the loss distribution and scenario-based approaches most commonly used to model operational risks, as well as Bayesian Networks. It aims to give a comprehensive yet practical guide to how one may validate each of these and provide assurance that the model is appropriate for a firm’s operational risk profile.","PeriodicalId":37177,"journal":{"name":"British Actuarial Journal","volume":"22 15","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operational Risk Working Party - Validating Operational Risk Models\",\"authors\":\"P. Kelliher, Madhu Acharyya, A. Couper, Edward N. V. Maguire, Choong A. Pang, C. Smerald, J. Sullivan, P. Teggin\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S1357321723000168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Operational Risk is one of the most difficult risks to model. It is a large and diverse category covering anything from cyber losses to mis-selling fines; and from processing errors to HR issues. Data is usually lacking, particularly for low frequency, high impact losses, and consequently there can be a heavy reliance on expert judgement. This paper seeks to help actuaries and other risk professionals tasked with the challenge of validating models of operational risks. It covers the loss distribution and scenario-based approaches most commonly used to model operational risks, as well as Bayesian Networks. It aims to give a comprehensive yet practical guide to how one may validate each of these and provide assurance that the model is appropriate for a firm’s operational risk profile.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Actuarial Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 15\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Actuarial Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321723000168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Actuarial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357321723000168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 运营风险是最难建模的风险之一。它是一个庞大而多样的类别,涵盖了从网络损失到不当销售罚款,从处理错误到人力资源问题等各个方面。数据通常是缺乏的,特别是对于低频率、高影响的损失,因此可能非常依赖专家判断。本文旨在帮助精算师和其他风险专业人员应对验证操作风险模型的挑战。它涵盖了最常用的损失分布和基于情景的操作风险建模方法,以及贝叶斯网络。它旨在提供一个全面而实用的指南,指导人们如何验证其中每一种方法,并保证模型适合公司的操作风险状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operational Risk Working Party - Validating Operational Risk Models
Abstract Operational Risk is one of the most difficult risks to model. It is a large and diverse category covering anything from cyber losses to mis-selling fines; and from processing errors to HR issues. Data is usually lacking, particularly for low frequency, high impact losses, and consequently there can be a heavy reliance on expert judgement. This paper seeks to help actuaries and other risk professionals tasked with the challenge of validating models of operational risks. It covers the loss distribution and scenario-based approaches most commonly used to model operational risks, as well as Bayesian Networks. It aims to give a comprehensive yet practical guide to how one may validate each of these and provide assurance that the model is appropriate for a firm’s operational risk profile.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
British Actuarial Journal
British Actuarial Journal Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信