从 COVID-19 期间的在家工作实验中学习:员工继续在家工作的动力

Hannah Kira Wilson, Matthew Tucker, Gemma Dale
{"title":"从 COVID-19 期间的在家工作实验中学习:员工继续在家工作的动力","authors":"Hannah Kira Wilson, Matthew Tucker, Gemma Dale","doi":"10.1108/joepp-05-2023-0184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research investigates the challenges and benefits of working from home and the needs that organisations should understand when adopting working from home practices.Design/methodology/approachSelf-determination theory was used to understand the drivers of motivation when working from home, to provide a deep understanding of how organisations may support employees working from home. A cross-sectional qualitative survey design was used to collect data from 511 office workers during May and June of 2020.FindingsEmployees' needs for competence were thwarted by a lack of direction and focus, unsuitable work environment, work extensification and negative work culture. Employees' experiences and needs for relatedness were more diverse, identifying that they enjoyed spending more time with family and having a greater connection to the outdoors, but felt more isolated and suffered from a lack of interaction. Employees' experiences of autonomy whilst working from home were also mixed, having less autonomy from blurred boundaries between home and work, as well as childcare responsibilities. Conversely, there was more freedom to be able to concentrate on physical health.Practical implicationsEmployee’s needs for competence should be prioritised. Organisations must be conscious of this and provide the support that enables direction and focus when working at home.Originality/valueSwathes of research were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, but overwhelmingly focused on quantitative methods. A qualitative survey design enabled participants to answer meaningful open-ended questions, better suited to explain the complexity of their experiences, which allowed for understanding and richness not gained through previous studies.","PeriodicalId":514623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","volume":"43 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from the working from home experiment during COVID-19: employees motivation to continue working from home\",\"authors\":\"Hannah Kira Wilson, Matthew Tucker, Gemma Dale\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/joepp-05-2023-0184\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThis research investigates the challenges and benefits of working from home and the needs that organisations should understand when adopting working from home practices.Design/methodology/approachSelf-determination theory was used to understand the drivers of motivation when working from home, to provide a deep understanding of how organisations may support employees working from home. A cross-sectional qualitative survey design was used to collect data from 511 office workers during May and June of 2020.FindingsEmployees' needs for competence were thwarted by a lack of direction and focus, unsuitable work environment, work extensification and negative work culture. Employees' experiences and needs for relatedness were more diverse, identifying that they enjoyed spending more time with family and having a greater connection to the outdoors, but felt more isolated and suffered from a lack of interaction. Employees' experiences of autonomy whilst working from home were also mixed, having less autonomy from blurred boundaries between home and work, as well as childcare responsibilities. Conversely, there was more freedom to be able to concentrate on physical health.Practical implicationsEmployee’s needs for competence should be prioritised. Organisations must be conscious of this and provide the support that enables direction and focus when working at home.Originality/valueSwathes of research were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, but overwhelmingly focused on quantitative methods. A qualitative survey design enabled participants to answer meaningful open-ended questions, better suited to explain the complexity of their experiences, which allowed for understanding and richness not gained through previous studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":514623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance\",\"volume\":\"43 28\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-05-2023-0184\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/joepp-05-2023-0184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究探讨了在家办公的挑战和益处,以及组织在采用在家办公做法时应了解的需求。设计/方法/途径采用自我决定理论来了解在家办公的动机驱动因素,从而深入了解组织如何支持在家办公的员工。研究采用横断面定性调查设计,在 2020 年 5 月和 6 月期间收集了 511 名上班族的数据。研究结果员工对能力的需求因缺乏方向和重点、不适宜的工作环境、工作扩展和消极的工作文化而受挫。员工对亲情的体验和需求则更加多样化,他们认为自己喜欢花更多的时间与家人在一起,与户外有更多的联系,但却感到更加孤立,缺乏互动。员工在家工作时的自主性体验也不尽相同,由于家庭和工作之间的界限模糊不清,再加上照顾子女的责任,他们的自主性较低。反之,则有更多的自由,可以专注于身体健康。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,进行了大量研究,但绝大多数都集中在定量方法上。定性调查设计使参与者能够回答有意义的开放式问题,更适合解释其经历的复杂性,从而获得以往研究无法获得的理解和丰富性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning from the working from home experiment during COVID-19: employees motivation to continue working from home
PurposeThis research investigates the challenges and benefits of working from home and the needs that organisations should understand when adopting working from home practices.Design/methodology/approachSelf-determination theory was used to understand the drivers of motivation when working from home, to provide a deep understanding of how organisations may support employees working from home. A cross-sectional qualitative survey design was used to collect data from 511 office workers during May and June of 2020.FindingsEmployees' needs for competence were thwarted by a lack of direction and focus, unsuitable work environment, work extensification and negative work culture. Employees' experiences and needs for relatedness were more diverse, identifying that they enjoyed spending more time with family and having a greater connection to the outdoors, but felt more isolated and suffered from a lack of interaction. Employees' experiences of autonomy whilst working from home were also mixed, having less autonomy from blurred boundaries between home and work, as well as childcare responsibilities. Conversely, there was more freedom to be able to concentrate on physical health.Practical implicationsEmployee’s needs for competence should be prioritised. Organisations must be conscious of this and provide the support that enables direction and focus when working at home.Originality/valueSwathes of research were conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic, but overwhelmingly focused on quantitative methods. A qualitative survey design enabled participants to answer meaningful open-ended questions, better suited to explain the complexity of their experiences, which allowed for understanding and richness not gained through previous studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信