在多角色平台中构思客户体验

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting
Dhrithi Mahadevan, G. Shainesh
{"title":"在多角色平台中构思客户体验","authors":"Dhrithi Mahadevan,&nbsp;G. Shainesh","doi":"10.1007/s13162-023-00272-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Customer experience (CX) is a critical marketing concept, yet most CX research has focused on pipeline business settings. This paper presents a framework for CX in multi-actor platform settings. The study identifies key differences between multi-actor platforms and pipeline businesses based on extant literature. Using value cocreation as a theoretical lens, the study uses the key differentiating characteristics to identify the emerging drivers of CX for platform touchpoints. These include ecosystem integration capabilities, optimized matchmaking algorithms, robust digital and technological support systems, trust and reputation mechanisms, and prosumption opportunities. Further, the study identifies provider-specific drivers of CX as asset performance, skills and capabilities, interpersonal interaction capabilities, and ambiance. The findings suggest that CX is not only shaped through interactions between multiple actors but also by the capabilities of the system as a whole to facilitate value cocreation processes. The paper presents propositions to further our understanding of CX in such business settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7786,"journal":{"name":"AMS Review","volume":"14 1-2","pages":"83 - 103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptualizing customer experience in multi-actor platforms\",\"authors\":\"Dhrithi Mahadevan,&nbsp;G. Shainesh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13162-023-00272-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Customer experience (CX) is a critical marketing concept, yet most CX research has focused on pipeline business settings. This paper presents a framework for CX in multi-actor platform settings. The study identifies key differences between multi-actor platforms and pipeline businesses based on extant literature. Using value cocreation as a theoretical lens, the study uses the key differentiating characteristics to identify the emerging drivers of CX for platform touchpoints. These include ecosystem integration capabilities, optimized matchmaking algorithms, robust digital and technological support systems, trust and reputation mechanisms, and prosumption opportunities. Further, the study identifies provider-specific drivers of CX as asset performance, skills and capabilities, interpersonal interaction capabilities, and ambiance. The findings suggest that CX is not only shaped through interactions between multiple actors but also by the capabilities of the system as a whole to facilitate value cocreation processes. The paper presents propositions to further our understanding of CX in such business settings.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AMS Review\",\"volume\":\"14 1-2\",\"pages\":\"83 - 103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AMS Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-023-00272-4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMS Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13162-023-00272-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

客户体验(CX)是一个重要的营销概念,但大多数客户体验研究都集中于管道业务环境。本文提出了多角色平台环境下的客户体验框架。研究基于现有文献,确定了多行为体平台与管道业务之间的主要差异。该研究以价值创造为理论视角,利用关键的差异化特征来识别平台接触点的新兴客户体验驱动因素。这些因素包括生态系统整合能力、优化的匹配算法、强大的数字和技术支持系统、信任和声誉机制以及消费机会。此外,研究还确定了特定服务提供商的客户体验驱动因素,包括资产绩效、技能和能力、人际互动能力和氛围。研究结果表明,顾客满意度不仅是通过多方参与者之间的互动形成的,也是通过整个系统促进价值创造过程的能力形成的。本文提出了一些命题,以进一步加深我们对此类商业环境中客户体验的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Conceptualizing customer experience in multi-actor platforms

Conceptualizing customer experience in multi-actor platforms

Customer experience (CX) is a critical marketing concept, yet most CX research has focused on pipeline business settings. This paper presents a framework for CX in multi-actor platform settings. The study identifies key differences between multi-actor platforms and pipeline businesses based on extant literature. Using value cocreation as a theoretical lens, the study uses the key differentiating characteristics to identify the emerging drivers of CX for platform touchpoints. These include ecosystem integration capabilities, optimized matchmaking algorithms, robust digital and technological support systems, trust and reputation mechanisms, and prosumption opportunities. Further, the study identifies provider-specific drivers of CX as asset performance, skills and capabilities, interpersonal interaction capabilities, and ambiance. The findings suggest that CX is not only shaped through interactions between multiple actors but also by the capabilities of the system as a whole to facilitate value cocreation processes. The paper presents propositions to further our understanding of CX in such business settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AMS Review
AMS Review Business, Management and Accounting-Marketing
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The AMS Review is positioned to be the premier journal in marketing that focuses exclusively on conceptual contributions across all sub-disciplines of marketing. It publishes articles that advance the development of market and marketing theory.The AMS Review is receptive to different philosophical perspectives and levels of analysis that range from micro to macro. Especially welcome are manuscripts that integrate research and theory from non-marketing disciplines such as management, sociology, economics, psychology, geography, anthropology, or other social sciences. Examples of suitable manuscripts include those incorporating conceptual and organizing frameworks or models, those extending, comparing, or critically evaluating existing theories, and those suggesting new or innovative theories. Comprehensive and integrative syntheses of research literatures (including quantitative and qualitative meta-analyses) are encouraged, as are paradigm-shifting manuscripts.Manuscripts that focus on purely descriptive literature reviews, proselytize research methods or techniques, or report empirical research findings will not be considered for publication.  The AMS Review does not publish manuscripts focusing on practitioner advice or marketing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信