将欧洲农场的杀虫剂用量减半:寻找替代技术

Q open Pub Date : 2024-01-19 DOI:10.1093/qopen/qoae003
Alexandre Gohin
{"title":"将欧洲农场的杀虫剂用量减半:寻找替代技术","authors":"Alexandre Gohin","doi":"10.1093/qopen/qoae003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n With the Green Deal roadmap, the European Union aims to half the uses and risks of pesticides by the end of this decade. The European Commission (EC) claims that the proposal for pesticides will not disrupt European agri-food production and price. The EC argues that previous assessments of the roadmap provide an upper limit to the effects of the proposal, mostly by ignoring alternative production techniques that rely on integrated pest management principles. Our paper first explains that the general equilibrium approach applied by the USDA does correctly capture these alternatives, measured implicitly in econometric studies on the price inelasticity of pesticide use. Second, we show that the USDA study significantly underestimates the negative effects of the proposal in terms of agri-food production, due to the input taxes rebated as output subsidies. Finally we show that the underestimation is robust to the other arguments raised by the EC.","PeriodicalId":87350,"journal":{"name":"Q open","volume":"2 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Halving the European farm uses of pesticides: looking for alternative technologies\",\"authors\":\"Alexandre Gohin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/qopen/qoae003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n With the Green Deal roadmap, the European Union aims to half the uses and risks of pesticides by the end of this decade. The European Commission (EC) claims that the proposal for pesticides will not disrupt European agri-food production and price. The EC argues that previous assessments of the roadmap provide an upper limit to the effects of the proposal, mostly by ignoring alternative production techniques that rely on integrated pest management principles. Our paper first explains that the general equilibrium approach applied by the USDA does correctly capture these alternatives, measured implicitly in econometric studies on the price inelasticity of pesticide use. Second, we show that the USDA study significantly underestimates the negative effects of the proposal in terms of agri-food production, due to the input taxes rebated as output subsidies. Finally we show that the underestimation is robust to the other arguments raised by the EC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Q open\",\"volume\":\"2 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Q open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Q open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoae003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过 "绿色交易 "路线图,欧盟的目标是在本十年末将杀虫剂的使用量和风险减半。欧盟委员会(EC)声称,有关杀虫剂的建议不会扰乱欧洲农业食品的生产和价格。欧盟委员会认为,以前对路线图的评估为该提案的影响提供了上限,主要是因为忽略了依赖于害虫综合治理原则的替代生产技术。我们的论文首先解释了美国农业部采用的一般均衡方法确实正确地捕捉到了这些替代方法,这些方法是通过对杀虫剂使用的价格缺乏弹性的计量经济学研究隐含地测量出来的。其次,我们表明,美国农业部的研究大大低估了该提案在农业食品生产方面的负面影响,原因是投入税被退还为产出补贴。最后,我们还表明,这种低估对欧盟委员会提出的其他论点也是稳健的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Halving the European farm uses of pesticides: looking for alternative technologies
With the Green Deal roadmap, the European Union aims to half the uses and risks of pesticides by the end of this decade. The European Commission (EC) claims that the proposal for pesticides will not disrupt European agri-food production and price. The EC argues that previous assessments of the roadmap provide an upper limit to the effects of the proposal, mostly by ignoring alternative production techniques that rely on integrated pest management principles. Our paper first explains that the general equilibrium approach applied by the USDA does correctly capture these alternatives, measured implicitly in econometric studies on the price inelasticity of pesticide use. Second, we show that the USDA study significantly underestimates the negative effects of the proposal in terms of agri-food production, due to the input taxes rebated as output subsidies. Finally we show that the underestimation is robust to the other arguments raised by the EC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信