袋内应用两种抗菌剂作为慢性牙周炎机械疗法辅助手段的疗效(一项比较研究)

Raed A. Badiea
{"title":"袋内应用两种抗菌剂作为慢性牙周炎机械疗法辅助手段的疗效(一项比较研究)","authors":"Raed A. Badiea","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2013.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of locally delivered antimicrobials as an adjunct to mechanotherapy in treatment of chronic periodontitis. Some studies were resulted in improved clinical outcomes and others were not. The aim of this study is evaluation of the efficacy and safety of subgingival application of a (10 mg metronidazole gel), (1% chlorhexidine collagen gel) and (CHLOSITE® GHIMAS, Italy) gel which is a combination of two chlorhexidine formulations: 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate and 1.0% chlorhexidine dihydrochloride), as an adjunct to mechanical treatment (scaling and root planing) (SRP) of chronic periodontitis. A total of 120 sites from 15 patients with age range of (24-55 years), who had periodontal pockets measuring 5-9 mm and had been diagnosed as chronic periodontitis cases, were selected for the study. The 4-quadrant split-mouth design was used in this study. The pocket sites in each patient were randomly assigned to 4 groups (30 sites for each):(Group A) GA=(SRP) only.(Group B) GB=(SRP) + 10 mg metronidazole gel.(Group C) GC=(SRP) + 1% chlorhexidine collagen gel. (Group D) GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE®Clinical parameters including (plaque index PI), (gingival index GI), (gingival bleeding index) GBI, (probing pocket depth PPD) & (clinical attachment level CAL) were measured and recorded at baseline before any treatment at (day 0) then the treatment was performed at the same day, The clinical parameters were also recorded at (day 30) & (day 90), in the selected sites of the four groups. The results of this study obviously showed a statistically significant reduction of all clinical parameters in all groups at (day 30 & day 90) from the base line (day 0). GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE® revealed a reduction of the clinical parameters than groups (A, B and C) and the differences were highly statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"2 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Intra-Pocket Application of Two Antimicrobial Agents as an Adjunct to Mechanotherapy of Chronic Periodontitis (a Comparative Study)\",\"authors\":\"Raed A. Badiea\",\"doi\":\"10.25130/tjds.2013.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of locally delivered antimicrobials as an adjunct to mechanotherapy in treatment of chronic periodontitis. Some studies were resulted in improved clinical outcomes and others were not. The aim of this study is evaluation of the efficacy and safety of subgingival application of a (10 mg metronidazole gel), (1% chlorhexidine collagen gel) and (CHLOSITE® GHIMAS, Italy) gel which is a combination of two chlorhexidine formulations: 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate and 1.0% chlorhexidine dihydrochloride), as an adjunct to mechanical treatment (scaling and root planing) (SRP) of chronic periodontitis. A total of 120 sites from 15 patients with age range of (24-55 years), who had periodontal pockets measuring 5-9 mm and had been diagnosed as chronic periodontitis cases, were selected for the study. The 4-quadrant split-mouth design was used in this study. The pocket sites in each patient were randomly assigned to 4 groups (30 sites for each):(Group A) GA=(SRP) only.(Group B) GB=(SRP) + 10 mg metronidazole gel.(Group C) GC=(SRP) + 1% chlorhexidine collagen gel. (Group D) GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE®Clinical parameters including (plaque index PI), (gingival index GI), (gingival bleeding index) GBI, (probing pocket depth PPD) & (clinical attachment level CAL) were measured and recorded at baseline before any treatment at (day 0) then the treatment was performed at the same day, The clinical parameters were also recorded at (day 30) & (day 90), in the selected sites of the four groups. The results of this study obviously showed a statistically significant reduction of all clinical parameters in all groups at (day 30 & day 90) from the base line (day 0). GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE® revealed a reduction of the clinical parameters than groups (A, B and C) and the differences were highly statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2013.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2013.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

已有大量研究评估了使用局部给药抗菌剂作为机械疗法的辅助手段治疗慢性牙周炎的效果。一些研究结果显示临床疗效有所改善,而另一些研究结果则不然。本研究旨在评估龈下应用(10 毫克甲硝唑凝胶)、(1% 洗必泰胶原凝胶)和(CHLOSITE® GHIMAS,意大利)凝胶的有效性和安全性:0.5%二葡萄糖酸氯己定和 1.0%二盐酸氯己定),作为慢性牙周炎机械治疗(洗牙和根面平整)(SRP)的辅助疗法。研究共选取了 15 名患者的 120 个部位,这些患者的年龄在 24-55 岁之间,牙周袋大小为 5-9 毫米,被诊断为慢性牙周炎病例。本研究采用四象限分口设计。每位患者的牙周袋部位被随机分配到 4 组(每组 30 个部位):(A 组)GA=(SRP);(B 组)GB=(SRP)+ 10 毫克甲硝唑凝胶;(C 组)GC=(SRP)+ 1%洗必泰胶原凝胶;(D 组)GD=(SRP)+ 10 毫克甲硝唑凝胶。(临床参数包括(牙菌斑指数 PI)、(牙龈指数 GI)、(牙龈出血指数 GBI)、(探针探入袋深度 PPD)和(临床附着水平 CAL),并在治疗前(第 0 天)进行基线测量和记录,然后在同一天进行治疗。研究结果表明,与基线(第 0 天)相比,所有组别在(第 30 天和第 90 天)的所有临床参数都有明显的统计学下降。与 A、B 和 C 组相比,GD=(SRP)+ CHLOSITE® 组的临床参数有所降低,且差异具有高度统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of Intra-Pocket Application of Two Antimicrobial Agents as an Adjunct to Mechanotherapy of Chronic Periodontitis (a Comparative Study)
Numerous studies have been performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of locally delivered antimicrobials as an adjunct to mechanotherapy in treatment of chronic periodontitis. Some studies were resulted in improved clinical outcomes and others were not. The aim of this study is evaluation of the efficacy and safety of subgingival application of a (10 mg metronidazole gel), (1% chlorhexidine collagen gel) and (CHLOSITE® GHIMAS, Italy) gel which is a combination of two chlorhexidine formulations: 0.5% chlorhexidine digluconate and 1.0% chlorhexidine dihydrochloride), as an adjunct to mechanical treatment (scaling and root planing) (SRP) of chronic periodontitis. A total of 120 sites from 15 patients with age range of (24-55 years), who had periodontal pockets measuring 5-9 mm and had been diagnosed as chronic periodontitis cases, were selected for the study. The 4-quadrant split-mouth design was used in this study. The pocket sites in each patient were randomly assigned to 4 groups (30 sites for each):(Group A) GA=(SRP) only.(Group B) GB=(SRP) + 10 mg metronidazole gel.(Group C) GC=(SRP) + 1% chlorhexidine collagen gel. (Group D) GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE®Clinical parameters including (plaque index PI), (gingival index GI), (gingival bleeding index) GBI, (probing pocket depth PPD) & (clinical attachment level CAL) were measured and recorded at baseline before any treatment at (day 0) then the treatment was performed at the same day, The clinical parameters were also recorded at (day 30) & (day 90), in the selected sites of the four groups. The results of this study obviously showed a statistically significant reduction of all clinical parameters in all groups at (day 30 & day 90) from the base line (day 0). GD=(SRP) + CHLOSITE® revealed a reduction of the clinical parameters than groups (A, B and C) and the differences were highly statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信