{"title":"用于正畸托槽粘接的可流动复合材料(体外研究)","authors":"Bahn Agha","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2.1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Flowable resin composites have been recommended for many clinical uses and have been formulated in a variety of compositions and viscosities to meet various uses. The aim of this study was to determine if flowable composite with or without resins could be used as orthodontic bracket bonding. Sixty noncarious human premolars were divided into three equal groups. Metal brackets were bonded to etched enamel using a composite resin control (Resilience® orthodontic adhesive) and flowable composite with and without sealant resin (Resilience® flowable composite). After 72 hours of incubation in deionized water at 37 C°, debonding was performed with a shearing force. The shear bond strength (SBS) and the mode of bond failure were examined. High significant difference was observed in the SBS between control and flowable groups. Clinically acceptable SBS was found for the two flowable adhesives with bond failures occurred mostly in the bracket–adhesive interface. No significant differences between flowable groups. In conclusion, the use of flowable composite with and without sealant resin is advocated for orthodontic bracket bonding","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"4 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Flowable Composite for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding (in vitro study)\",\"authors\":\"Bahn Agha\",\"doi\":\"10.25130/tjds.2.1.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Flowable resin composites have been recommended for many clinical uses and have been formulated in a variety of compositions and viscosities to meet various uses. The aim of this study was to determine if flowable composite with or without resins could be used as orthodontic bracket bonding. Sixty noncarious human premolars were divided into three equal groups. Metal brackets were bonded to etched enamel using a composite resin control (Resilience® orthodontic adhesive) and flowable composite with and without sealant resin (Resilience® flowable composite). After 72 hours of incubation in deionized water at 37 C°, debonding was performed with a shearing force. The shear bond strength (SBS) and the mode of bond failure were examined. High significant difference was observed in the SBS between control and flowable groups. Clinically acceptable SBS was found for the two flowable adhesives with bond failures occurred mostly in the bracket–adhesive interface. No significant differences between flowable groups. In conclusion, the use of flowable composite with and without sealant resin is advocated for orthodontic bracket bonding\",\"PeriodicalId\":512116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"4 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
可流动树脂复合材料已被推荐用于多种临床用途,并已配制成各种成分和粘度以满足各种用途。本研究的目的是确定含树脂或不含树脂的可流动树脂复合材料是否可用作正畸托槽粘结剂。研究人员将 60 颗未龋坏的人类前臼齿分为三组。使用复合树脂对照组(Resilience® 正畸粘合剂)和含或不含封闭树脂的可流动复合材料(Resilience® 可流动复合材料)将金属托槽粘结到蚀刻的牙釉质上。在 37 摄氏度的去离子水中培养 72 小时后,用剪切力进行脱粘。对剪切粘接强度(SBS)和粘接破坏模式进行了检测。对照组和可流动组的 SBS 差异很大。发现两种可流动粘合剂的 SBS 在临床上是可以接受的,粘接失败主要发生在托槽-粘合剂界面。可流动组之间无明显差异。总之,在正畸托槽粘接中使用含或不含密封树脂的可流动复合材料是值得提倡的。
Flowable Composite for Orthodontic Bracket Bonding (in vitro study)
Flowable resin composites have been recommended for many clinical uses and have been formulated in a variety of compositions and viscosities to meet various uses. The aim of this study was to determine if flowable composite with or without resins could be used as orthodontic bracket bonding. Sixty noncarious human premolars were divided into three equal groups. Metal brackets were bonded to etched enamel using a composite resin control (Resilience® orthodontic adhesive) and flowable composite with and without sealant resin (Resilience® flowable composite). After 72 hours of incubation in deionized water at 37 C°, debonding was performed with a shearing force. The shear bond strength (SBS) and the mode of bond failure were examined. High significant difference was observed in the SBS between control and flowable groups. Clinically acceptable SBS was found for the two flowable adhesives with bond failures occurred mostly in the bracket–adhesive interface. No significant differences between flowable groups. In conclusion, the use of flowable composite with and without sealant resin is advocated for orthodontic bracket bonding