市售石膏产品某些性能的比较

Tameem K. Jassim تميم خضر جاسم
{"title":"市售石膏产品某些性能的比较","authors":"Tameem K. Jassim تميم خضر جاسم","doi":"10.25130/tjds.2.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gypsum models are often used in dental healthcare, and there is an increased need for manipulation of master casts in extensive reconstructions requi ring a material that is not easily abraded or damaged with dimensional accuracy, accurate reproduction of details, and the use of a voids free surface master model. This study was conducted to compare between commercially available type III and type IV dental stones in some of their properties. Four groups were compared: Zhermack and Geastone of Type III dental stone, and Zhermack and Bluejey of Type IV improved dental stone. Ten specimens were fabricated for each material from a rubber ring w ith dimensions of 20mm height and 30mm diameter. Dimensional stability, reproduction of details, surface porosity, and surface hardness were evaluated for the different gypsum products. Results of this study show that for the dimensional stability there was an increase in dimension more than that of the test block and was only highly significant for groups Z3 and Z4. The surface hardness for groups Z3 and Z4 was significant higher than groups G3 and B4 in all of time intervals except after 24h for groups Z4 and B4 this was insignificant. Surface porosity test and reproduction of details test, both revealed no significant difference between the test groups. As conclusion the Zhermack dental stone products, type III & IV, showed higher surface hardness than Zeus dental stone products, type III & IV (Geastone and Bluejey). On the other hand we found that Zeus dental stone products showed good dimensional stability than the Zhermack dental stone products. All stone products provided similar scores for details reproduction, and were similar in relation to surface porosity.","PeriodicalId":512116,"journal":{"name":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","volume":"1 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Some Properties between Commercially Available Gypsum Products\",\"authors\":\"Tameem K. Jassim تميم خضر جاسم\",\"doi\":\"10.25130/tjds.2.1.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Gypsum models are often used in dental healthcare, and there is an increased need for manipulation of master casts in extensive reconstructions requi ring a material that is not easily abraded or damaged with dimensional accuracy, accurate reproduction of details, and the use of a voids free surface master model. This study was conducted to compare between commercially available type III and type IV dental stones in some of their properties. Four groups were compared: Zhermack and Geastone of Type III dental stone, and Zhermack and Bluejey of Type IV improved dental stone. Ten specimens were fabricated for each material from a rubber ring w ith dimensions of 20mm height and 30mm diameter. Dimensional stability, reproduction of details, surface porosity, and surface hardness were evaluated for the different gypsum products. Results of this study show that for the dimensional stability there was an increase in dimension more than that of the test block and was only highly significant for groups Z3 and Z4. The surface hardness for groups Z3 and Z4 was significant higher than groups G3 and B4 in all of time intervals except after 24h for groups Z4 and B4 this was insignificant. Surface porosity test and reproduction of details test, both revealed no significant difference between the test groups. As conclusion the Zhermack dental stone products, type III & IV, showed higher surface hardness than Zeus dental stone products, type III & IV (Geastone and Bluejey). On the other hand we found that Zeus dental stone products showed good dimensional stability than the Zhermack dental stone products. All stone products provided similar scores for details reproduction, and were similar in relation to surface porosity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":512116,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"1 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tikrit Journal for Dental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25130/tjds.2.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

石膏模型经常被用于牙科医疗保健中,在大面积重建中,对石膏模型的操作要求越来越高,需要一种不易磨损或损坏、尺寸精确、细节再现准确、表面无空隙的材料。本研究对市售的 III 型和 IV 型牙科石的某些特性进行了比较。共有四组进行了比较:Zhermack 和 Geastone 的 III 型牙科石材,以及 Zhermack 和 Bluejey 的 IV 型改良牙科石材。每种材料都用一个高 20 毫米、直径 30 毫米的橡胶圈制作了十个试样。对不同石膏产品的尺寸稳定性、细节再现、表面气孔率和表面硬度进行了评估。研究结果表明,在尺寸稳定性方面,尺寸的增加幅度大于试块的增加幅度,只有 Z3 和 Z4 组的尺寸增加幅度非常显著。Z3 组和 Z4 组的表面硬度在所有时间间隔内都明显高于 G3 组和 B4 组,只有 Z4 组和 B4 组在 24 小时后显著降低。表面孔隙率测试和细节再现测试显示,各测试组之间没有明显差异。综上所述,Zhermack 牙科石产品 III 和 IV 型的表面硬度高于 Zeus 牙科石产品 III 和 IV 型(Geastone 和 Bluejey)。另一方面,我们发现 Zeus 牙科石材产品比 Zhermack 牙科石材产品具有良好的尺寸稳定性。所有石材产品在细节再现方面的得分相似,在表面孔隙率方面也相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Some Properties between Commercially Available Gypsum Products
Gypsum models are often used in dental healthcare, and there is an increased need for manipulation of master casts in extensive reconstructions requi ring a material that is not easily abraded or damaged with dimensional accuracy, accurate reproduction of details, and the use of a voids free surface master model. This study was conducted to compare between commercially available type III and type IV dental stones in some of their properties. Four groups were compared: Zhermack and Geastone of Type III dental stone, and Zhermack and Bluejey of Type IV improved dental stone. Ten specimens were fabricated for each material from a rubber ring w ith dimensions of 20mm height and 30mm diameter. Dimensional stability, reproduction of details, surface porosity, and surface hardness were evaluated for the different gypsum products. Results of this study show that for the dimensional stability there was an increase in dimension more than that of the test block and was only highly significant for groups Z3 and Z4. The surface hardness for groups Z3 and Z4 was significant higher than groups G3 and B4 in all of time intervals except after 24h for groups Z4 and B4 this was insignificant. Surface porosity test and reproduction of details test, both revealed no significant difference between the test groups. As conclusion the Zhermack dental stone products, type III & IV, showed higher surface hardness than Zeus dental stone products, type III & IV (Geastone and Bluejey). On the other hand we found that Zeus dental stone products showed good dimensional stability than the Zhermack dental stone products. All stone products provided similar scores for details reproduction, and were similar in relation to surface porosity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信