评估初级保健中常见症状的视频就诊适当性:回顾性队列研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1177/1357633X231224094
Doris Chen, Elyse Gonzales, Marcy Winget, Jonathan Shaw, Maja Artandi, Sandra A Tsai, Ian Nelligan
{"title":"评估初级保健中常见症状的视频就诊适当性:回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Doris Chen, Elyse Gonzales, Marcy Winget, Jonathan Shaw, Maja Artandi, Sandra A Tsai, Ian Nelligan","doi":"10.1177/1357633X231224094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionLittle is known about which conditions seen in primary care are appropriate for video visits. This study evaluated video visits compared to office visits for six conditions: abdominal pain, joint pain, back pain, headache, chest pain, and dizziness.MethodsSix hundred charts of adult patients from our institution's same-day outpatient clinic were reviewed in this study. Charts for video visits evaluating the aforementioned chief complaints that occurred between August and October 2020 were reviewed and compared with charts for office visits that occurred from August to September 2019. Frequencies of 3-week follow-up visits, Emergency Room visits, imaging, and referrals for office and video visits were measured. Reasons for in-person evaluation for patients seen by video were determined by review of clinician notes.ResultsThree-week in-person follow-up was more frequent for patients presenting with chest pain (52% vs 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007) and joint pain (24% vs 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.05) after video evaluation, relative to an office evaluation. Three-week in-person follow-up was also more frequent for patients presenting with dizziness (38% vs 28%) and low back pain (24% vs 14%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients presenting with headache and abdominal pain did not have a higher rate of follow-up.DiscussionBased on the frequency of in-person follow-up, this study suggests that video visits are generally adequate for evaluating headache and abdominal pain. Patients with dizziness and chest pain have the highest frequency of in-person and Emergency Room follow-up within 3 weeks when first seen by video compared to other conditions evaluated and may be less suitable for an initial video visit. Institutions can consider these findings when scheduling and providing guidance to patients on what type of visit is most appropriate for their symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"826-831"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of video visit appropriateness for common symptoms seen in primary care: A retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Doris Chen, Elyse Gonzales, Marcy Winget, Jonathan Shaw, Maja Artandi, Sandra A Tsai, Ian Nelligan\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1357633X231224094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>IntroductionLittle is known about which conditions seen in primary care are appropriate for video visits. This study evaluated video visits compared to office visits for six conditions: abdominal pain, joint pain, back pain, headache, chest pain, and dizziness.MethodsSix hundred charts of adult patients from our institution's same-day outpatient clinic were reviewed in this study. Charts for video visits evaluating the aforementioned chief complaints that occurred between August and October 2020 were reviewed and compared with charts for office visits that occurred from August to September 2019. Frequencies of 3-week follow-up visits, Emergency Room visits, imaging, and referrals for office and video visits were measured. Reasons for in-person evaluation for patients seen by video were determined by review of clinician notes.ResultsThree-week in-person follow-up was more frequent for patients presenting with chest pain (52% vs 18%, <i>p</i> = 0.0007) and joint pain (24% vs 8%, <i>p</i> = 0.05) after video evaluation, relative to an office evaluation. Three-week in-person follow-up was also more frequent for patients presenting with dizziness (38% vs 28%) and low back pain (24% vs 14%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients presenting with headache and abdominal pain did not have a higher rate of follow-up.DiscussionBased on the frequency of in-person follow-up, this study suggests that video visits are generally adequate for evaluating headache and abdominal pain. Patients with dizziness and chest pain have the highest frequency of in-person and Emergency Room follow-up within 3 weeks when first seen by video compared to other conditions evaluated and may be less suitable for an initial video visit. Institutions can consider these findings when scheduling and providing guidance to patients on what type of visit is most appropriate for their symptoms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"826-831\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231224094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X231224094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介人们对初级保健中哪些疾病适合视频就诊知之甚少。本研究对腹痛、关节痛、背痛、头痛、胸痛和头晕这六种疾病的视频就诊与诊室就诊进行了评估:本研究审查了本机构当天门诊的 600 份成人患者病历。研究回顾了 2020 年 8 月至 10 月期间评估上述主诉的视频门诊病历,并与 2019 年 8 月至 9 月期间的门诊病历进行了比较。研究人员测量了 3 周随访、急诊室就诊、影像学检查以及诊室和视频就诊转诊的频率。通过审查临床医生的记录,确定了通过视频就诊的患者接受现场评估的原因:结果:相对于诊室评估,视频评估后出现胸痛(52% vs 18%,p = 0.0007)和关节痛(24% vs 8%,p = 0.05)的患者更常接受三周的现场随访。头晕(38% 对 28%)和腰背痛(24% 对 14%)患者接受三周现场随访的比例也更高;但这一差异并无统计学意义。头痛和腹痛患者的随访率并不高:讨论:根据亲自随访的频率,本研究表明,视频就诊通常足以评估头痛和腹痛。与其他评估病症相比,头晕和胸痛患者首次通过视频就诊时,3 周内的亲诊和急诊室随访频率最高,可能不太适合首次视频就诊。医疗机构在安排和指导患者选择最适合其症状的就诊类型时,可以考虑这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of video visit appropriateness for common symptoms seen in primary care: A retrospective cohort study.

IntroductionLittle is known about which conditions seen in primary care are appropriate for video visits. This study evaluated video visits compared to office visits for six conditions: abdominal pain, joint pain, back pain, headache, chest pain, and dizziness.MethodsSix hundred charts of adult patients from our institution's same-day outpatient clinic were reviewed in this study. Charts for video visits evaluating the aforementioned chief complaints that occurred between August and October 2020 were reviewed and compared with charts for office visits that occurred from August to September 2019. Frequencies of 3-week follow-up visits, Emergency Room visits, imaging, and referrals for office and video visits were measured. Reasons for in-person evaluation for patients seen by video were determined by review of clinician notes.ResultsThree-week in-person follow-up was more frequent for patients presenting with chest pain (52% vs 18%, p = 0.0007) and joint pain (24% vs 8%, p = 0.05) after video evaluation, relative to an office evaluation. Three-week in-person follow-up was also more frequent for patients presenting with dizziness (38% vs 28%) and low back pain (24% vs 14%); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Patients presenting with headache and abdominal pain did not have a higher rate of follow-up.DiscussionBased on the frequency of in-person follow-up, this study suggests that video visits are generally adequate for evaluating headache and abdominal pain. Patients with dizziness and chest pain have the highest frequency of in-person and Emergency Room follow-up within 3 weeks when first seen by video compared to other conditions evaluated and may be less suitable for an initial video visit. Institutions can consider these findings when scheduling and providing guidance to patients on what type of visit is most appropriate for their symptoms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信