M A Gasanov, Sh N Danielyan, F A Chernousov, A M Gasanov, K M Rabadanov, E V Tatarinova, T G Barmina, G P Titova, S K Nevdah
{"title":"[内窥镜真空疗法在食道穿孔微创治疗中的应用]。","authors":"M A Gasanov, Sh N Danielyan, F A Chernousov, A M Gasanov, K M Rabadanov, E V Tatarinova, T G Barmina, G P Titova, S K Nevdah","doi":"10.17116/hirurgia202401121","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (<i>p</i>=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, <i>p</i>=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (<i>p</i>=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, <i>p</i>=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (<i>n</i>=4) and 29% (<i>n</i>=9), respectively (<i>p</i>=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, <i>p</i>=0.035) compared to traditional surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":35986,"journal":{"name":"Khirurgiya","volume":" 1","pages":"21-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations].\",\"authors\":\"M A Gasanov, Sh N Danielyan, F A Chernousov, A M Gasanov, K M Rabadanov, E V Tatarinova, T G Barmina, G P Titova, S K Nevdah\",\"doi\":\"10.17116/hirurgia202401121\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (<i>p</i>=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, <i>p</i>=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (<i>p</i>=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, <i>p</i>=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (<i>n</i>=4) and 29% (<i>n</i>=9), respectively (<i>p</i>=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, <i>p</i>=0.035) compared to traditional surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"volume\":\" 1\",\"pages\":\"21-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Khirurgiya\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202401121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khirurgiya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17116/hirurgia202401121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
[Endoscopic vacuum therapy in minimally invasive treatment of esophageal perforations].
Objective: To compare the results of endoscopic vacuum therapy (EVT) and open surgery for esophageal perforations.
Material and methods: The study included 60 patients with esophageal perforations between 2010 and 2022. The main group included 29 patients who underwent minimally invasive treatment with EVT, the control group - 31 patients after open surgical interventions.
Results: Pneumonia occurred in 21 (72%) and 14 (45%) patients (p=0.04), esophageal stenosis within the perforation zone - in 4 (13.8%) and 1 (3.2%) patient, respectively (p=0.188). Chronic esophageal fistulas were significantly more common in the control group (6 (20.7%) versus 15 (48.4%) patients, p=0.032). The overall duration of treatment (median) among survivors was significantly shorter in the main group: 33 (23; 48) versus 71.5 (59; 93.7) days (p=0.5). However, length of ICU-stay was slightly higher (11 (6; 16) versus 8.5 (5; 12.75) days, p=0.32). Mortality rate was 13.8% (n=4) and 29% (n=9), respectively (p=0.213). Minimally invasive technologies decreased the risk of fatal outcome by 10 times (OR 10.123, 95% CI 1.491-124.97, p=0.035) compared to traditional surgery.
Conclusion: EVT in complex minimally invasive treatment of patients with mechanical esophageal injuries is an effective method significantly reducing mortality and duration of inpatient treatment compared to traditional surgical approach.