{"title":"治疗师在破裂和解决过程中的反应能力:患者和治疗师的观点一致吗?","authors":"Maayan Levy Chajmovic, Orya Tishby","doi":"10.1080/10503307.2024.2303318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association between the rupture-repair process and patients' and therapists' perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used the Rupture Resolution Rating System to rate early sessions (3-5) in 35 short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy cases. The patients and therapists rated their perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness after each session using the Patient's Experience of Attunement and Responsiveness (PEAR) Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Therapists' contribution to ruptures was negatively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. Confrontation ruptures were negatively associated with patients' PEAR ratings, whereas there was no significant association with withdrawal ruptures. Resolution was positively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. In addition, resolution moderated the negative association between ruptures and patients' PEAR ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasize the link between therapists' responsiveness and the rupture-repair process. They also highlight the significance of providing therapists with the necessary training to recognize these dynamics and engage in discussions about them with their patients when appropriate.</p>","PeriodicalId":48159,"journal":{"name":"Psychotherapy Research","volume":" ","pages":"42-53"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Therapists' responsiveness in the process of ruptures and resolution: Are patients and therapists on the same page?\",\"authors\":\"Maayan Levy Chajmovic, Orya Tishby\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10503307.2024.2303318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study examined the association between the rupture-repair process and patients' and therapists' perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We used the Rupture Resolution Rating System to rate early sessions (3-5) in 35 short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy cases. The patients and therapists rated their perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness after each session using the Patient's Experience of Attunement and Responsiveness (PEAR) Scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Therapists' contribution to ruptures was negatively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. Confrontation ruptures were negatively associated with patients' PEAR ratings, whereas there was no significant association with withdrawal ruptures. Resolution was positively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. In addition, resolution moderated the negative association between ruptures and patients' PEAR ratings.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings emphasize the link between therapists' responsiveness and the rupture-repair process. They also highlight the significance of providing therapists with the necessary training to recognize these dynamics and engage in discussions about them with their patients when appropriate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"42-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychotherapy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2303318\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychotherapy Research","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2024.2303318","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Therapists' responsiveness in the process of ruptures and resolution: Are patients and therapists on the same page?
Objective: This study examined the association between the rupture-repair process and patients' and therapists' perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness.
Method: We used the Rupture Resolution Rating System to rate early sessions (3-5) in 35 short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy cases. The patients and therapists rated their perceptions of the therapist's responsiveness after each session using the Patient's Experience of Attunement and Responsiveness (PEAR) Scale.
Results: Therapists' contribution to ruptures was negatively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. Confrontation ruptures were negatively associated with patients' PEAR ratings, whereas there was no significant association with withdrawal ruptures. Resolution was positively associated with both patients' and therapists' PEAR ratings. In addition, resolution moderated the negative association between ruptures and patients' PEAR ratings.
Conclusion: The findings emphasize the link between therapists' responsiveness and the rupture-repair process. They also highlight the significance of providing therapists with the necessary training to recognize these dynamics and engage in discussions about them with their patients when appropriate.
期刊介绍:
Psychotherapy Research seeks to enhance the development, scientific quality, and social relevance of psychotherapy research and to foster the use of research findings in practice, education, and policy formulation. The Journal publishes reports of original research on all aspects of psychotherapy, including its outcomes, its processes, education of practitioners, and delivery of services. It also publishes methodological, theoretical, and review articles of direct relevance to psychotherapy research. The Journal is addressed to an international, interdisciplinary audience and welcomes submissions dealing with diverse theoretical orientations, treatment modalities.