接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者在置入中心静脉端口后发生袋状感染或血流感染的风险。

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1177/10781552231225933
Shintaro Sueyoshi, Takeharu Ono, Shun-Ichi Chitose, Mioko Fukahori, Takashi Kurita, Hirohito Umeno
{"title":"接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者在置入中心静脉端口后发生袋状感染或血流感染的风险。","authors":"Shintaro Sueyoshi, Takeharu Ono, Shun-Ichi Chitose, Mioko Fukahori, Takashi Kurita, Hirohito Umeno","doi":"10.1177/10781552231225933","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveCetuximab is a molecular targeted drug that targets epithelial growth factor receptors. The skin toxicity of cetuximab arising from epithelial growth factor inhibition is well known. Some patients with cetuximab therapy decided to make central venous port during the long-term intravenous treatments. Therefore, the author hypothesized that cetuximab administration might increase the risk of central venous port-related infection due to damage to skin barrier function. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between cetuximab administration and central venous port-related infection.MethodsA total of 83 patients had a central venous port placed from 2016 through 2021. We analyzed, retrospectively, the relationship between cetuximab therapy and the incidence of central venous port-related infection involving central line-associated bloodstream infection and pocket infection. Additionally, the risk factors of central venous port-related infection were examined in the population undergoing cetuximab therapy.ResultsIn total populations (83 cases), central line-associated bloodstream infection happened in five patients (6%) and pocket infection happened in six patients (7%) after central venous port placement. In the cetuximab therapy group (45 cases), there were four patients with central line-associated bloodstream infection (9%) and six with pocket infection (13%). The pocket infection happened more frequently in the cetuximab group than the other group with significant differences. Additionally, in the cetuximab group, the patients who had an interval of less than seven days between central venous port placement and cetuximab dosing, or central venous port placement preceded by cetuximab dosing had more pocket infection with significant differences.ConclusionSkin complications after the central venous port placement were related to cetuximab administration and the timing of cetuximab therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":16637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","volume":" ","pages":"195-202"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The risk of pocket infection or bloodstream infection following central venous port placement for the patients with Cetuximab therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Shintaro Sueyoshi, Takeharu Ono, Shun-Ichi Chitose, Mioko Fukahori, Takashi Kurita, Hirohito Umeno\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10781552231225933\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>ObjectiveCetuximab is a molecular targeted drug that targets epithelial growth factor receptors. The skin toxicity of cetuximab arising from epithelial growth factor inhibition is well known. Some patients with cetuximab therapy decided to make central venous port during the long-term intravenous treatments. Therefore, the author hypothesized that cetuximab administration might increase the risk of central venous port-related infection due to damage to skin barrier function. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between cetuximab administration and central venous port-related infection.MethodsA total of 83 patients had a central venous port placed from 2016 through 2021. We analyzed, retrospectively, the relationship between cetuximab therapy and the incidence of central venous port-related infection involving central line-associated bloodstream infection and pocket infection. Additionally, the risk factors of central venous port-related infection were examined in the population undergoing cetuximab therapy.ResultsIn total populations (83 cases), central line-associated bloodstream infection happened in five patients (6%) and pocket infection happened in six patients (7%) after central venous port placement. In the cetuximab therapy group (45 cases), there were four patients with central line-associated bloodstream infection (9%) and six with pocket infection (13%). The pocket infection happened more frequently in the cetuximab group than the other group with significant differences. Additionally, in the cetuximab group, the patients who had an interval of less than seven days between central venous port placement and cetuximab dosing, or central venous port placement preceded by cetuximab dosing had more pocket infection with significant differences.ConclusionSkin complications after the central venous port placement were related to cetuximab administration and the timing of cetuximab therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"195-202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231225933\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10781552231225933","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:西妥昔单抗是一种针对上皮细胞生长因子受体的分子靶向药物:西妥昔单抗是一种靶向上皮细胞生长因子受体的分子靶向药物。西妥昔单抗因抑制上皮生长因子而引起的皮肤毒性已众所周知。一些接受西妥昔单抗治疗的患者决定在长期静脉治疗过程中建立中心静脉通路。因此,作者推测,西妥昔单抗可能会因皮肤屏障功能受损而增加中心静脉端口相关感染的风险。本研究的主要目的是探讨西妥昔单抗用药与中心静脉端口相关感染之间的关系:从2016年到2021年,共有83名患者置入了中心静脉端口。我们回顾性地分析了西妥昔单抗治疗与中心静脉端口相关感染(包括中心静脉相关血流感染和口袋感染)发生率之间的关系。此外,还研究了接受西妥昔单抗治疗人群中中心静脉端口相关感染的风险因素:结果:在接受西妥昔单抗治疗的所有人群(83例)中,有5名患者(6%)发生了中心静脉相关血流感染,有6名患者(7%)在中心静脉置管后发生了口袋感染。在西妥昔单抗治疗组(45 例)中,有 4 名患者发生中心静脉相关性血流感染(9%),6 名患者发生口袋感染(13%)。西妥昔单抗组发生血袋感染的频率高于其他组,且差异显著。此外,在西妥昔单抗组中,中心静脉置管与西妥昔单抗用药间隔时间少于7天或中心静脉置管在西妥昔单抗用药之前的患者发生口袋感染的几率更高,且差异显著:结论:中心静脉置管后的皮肤并发症与西妥昔单抗用药和西妥昔单抗治疗的时间有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The risk of pocket infection or bloodstream infection following central venous port placement for the patients with Cetuximab therapy.

ObjectiveCetuximab is a molecular targeted drug that targets epithelial growth factor receptors. The skin toxicity of cetuximab arising from epithelial growth factor inhibition is well known. Some patients with cetuximab therapy decided to make central venous port during the long-term intravenous treatments. Therefore, the author hypothesized that cetuximab administration might increase the risk of central venous port-related infection due to damage to skin barrier function. The main aim of the present study was to investigate the relationship between cetuximab administration and central venous port-related infection.MethodsA total of 83 patients had a central venous port placed from 2016 through 2021. We analyzed, retrospectively, the relationship between cetuximab therapy and the incidence of central venous port-related infection involving central line-associated bloodstream infection and pocket infection. Additionally, the risk factors of central venous port-related infection were examined in the population undergoing cetuximab therapy.ResultsIn total populations (83 cases), central line-associated bloodstream infection happened in five patients (6%) and pocket infection happened in six patients (7%) after central venous port placement. In the cetuximab therapy group (45 cases), there were four patients with central line-associated bloodstream infection (9%) and six with pocket infection (13%). The pocket infection happened more frequently in the cetuximab group than the other group with significant differences. Additionally, in the cetuximab group, the patients who had an interval of less than seven days between central venous port placement and cetuximab dosing, or central venous port placement preceded by cetuximab dosing had more pocket infection with significant differences.ConclusionSkin complications after the central venous port placement were related to cetuximab administration and the timing of cetuximab therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
276
期刊介绍: Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to educating health professionals about providing pharmaceutical care to patients with cancer. It is the official publication of the International Society for Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners (ISOPP). Publishing pertinent case reports and consensus guidelines...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信