Alish Kolashov, Shahram Lotfi, Jan Spillner, Mohamed Shoaib, Saif Almaghrabi, Nima Hatam, Assad Haneya, Rashad Zayat, Mohammad Amen Khattab
{"title":"肺切除术后心肌工作变化的评估--手术方式的意义:VATS 和开胸手术的超声心动图对比。","authors":"Alish Kolashov, Shahram Lotfi, Jan Spillner, Mohamed Shoaib, Saif Almaghrabi, Nima Hatam, Assad Haneya, Rashad Zayat, Mohammad Amen Khattab","doi":"10.1007/s11748-023-02005-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering the controversial benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), we intended to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on cardiac function after lung resection using myocardial work analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographic data of 48 patients (25 thoracotomy vs. 23 VATS) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 2 weeks before and after surgery, including two-dimensional speckle tracking and tissue Doppler imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No notable changes in left ventricular (LV) function, assessed mainly using the LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global myocardial work index (GMWI), and global work efficiency (GWE), were observed. Right ventricular (RV) TTE values, including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV), right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), and RV free-wall GLS (RVFWGLS), indicated greater RV function impairment in the thoracotomy group than in the VATS group [TAPSE(mm) 17.90 ± 3.80 vs. 21.00 ± 3.48, p = 0.006; d = 0.84; TASV(cm/s): 12.40 ± 2.90 vs. 14.70 ± 2.40, p = 0.004, d = 0.86; RVGLS(%): - 16.00 ± 4.50 vs. - 19.40 ± 2.30, p = 0.012, d = 0.20; RVFWGLS(%): - 11.50 ± 8.50 vs. - 18.31 ± 5.40, p = 0.009, d = 0.59; respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike RV function, LV function remained preserved after lung resection. The thoracotomy group exhibited greater RV function impairment than did the VATS group. Further studies should evaluate the long-term impact of surgical approach on cardiac function.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"542-550"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of myocardial work changes after lung resection-the significance of surgical approach: an echocardiographic comparison between VATS and thoracotomy.\",\"authors\":\"Alish Kolashov, Shahram Lotfi, Jan Spillner, Mohamed Shoaib, Saif Almaghrabi, Nima Hatam, Assad Haneya, Rashad Zayat, Mohammad Amen Khattab\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11748-023-02005-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Considering the controversial benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), we intended to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on cardiac function after lung resection using myocardial work analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Echocardiographic data of 48 patients (25 thoracotomy vs. 23 VATS) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 2 weeks before and after surgery, including two-dimensional speckle tracking and tissue Doppler imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No notable changes in left ventricular (LV) function, assessed mainly using the LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global myocardial work index (GMWI), and global work efficiency (GWE), were observed. Right ventricular (RV) TTE values, including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV), right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), and RV free-wall GLS (RVFWGLS), indicated greater RV function impairment in the thoracotomy group than in the VATS group [TAPSE(mm) 17.90 ± 3.80 vs. 21.00 ± 3.48, p = 0.006; d = 0.84; TASV(cm/s): 12.40 ± 2.90 vs. 14.70 ± 2.40, p = 0.004, d = 0.86; RVGLS(%): - 16.00 ± 4.50 vs. - 19.40 ± 2.30, p = 0.012, d = 0.20; RVFWGLS(%): - 11.50 ± 8.50 vs. - 18.31 ± 5.40, p = 0.009, d = 0.59; respectively].</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Unlike RV function, LV function remained preserved after lung resection. The thoracotomy group exhibited greater RV function impairment than did the VATS group. Further studies should evaluate the long-term impact of surgical approach on cardiac function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"542-550\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-02005-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-023-02005-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究目的考虑到视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)的优点存在争议,我们打算利用心肌工作分析评估手术方法对肺切除术后心功能的影响:方法: 我们对 48 例患者(25 例开胸术与 23 例 VATS)的超声心动图数据进行了回顾性分析。所有患者均在手术前后两周内接受了经胸超声心动图(TTE)检查,包括二维斑点追踪和组织多普勒成像:主要通过左心室整体纵向应变(GLS)、整体心肌工作指数(GMWI)和整体工作效率(GWE)评估左心室(LV)功能,未观察到明显变化。右心室(RV)TTE 值,包括三尖瓣环平面收缩期偏移(TAPSE)、三尖瓣环收缩期速度(TASV)、右心室整体纵向应变(RVGLS)和右心室自由壁 GLS(RVFWGLS),显示开胸术组的 RV 功能损伤大于 VATS 组 [TAPSE(mm) 17.90 ± 3.80 vs. 21.00 ± 3.48, p = 0.006; d = 0.84; TASV(cm/s): 12.40 ± 2.90 vs. 14.70 ± 2.40, p = 0.004, d = 0.86; RVGLS(%):- 16.00 ± 4.50 vs. - 19.40 ± 2.30, p = 0.012, d = 0.20; RVFWGLS(%):- 11.50 ± 8.50 vs. - 18.31 ± 5.40,p = 0.009,d = 0.59;分别]:结论:与 RV 功能不同,肺切除术后 LV 功能仍得以保留。结论:与左心室功能不同,肺切除术后左心室功能仍得以保留,而开胸手术组的左心室功能受损程度大于 VATS 组。进一步的研究应评估手术方法对心脏功能的长期影响。
Evaluation of myocardial work changes after lung resection-the significance of surgical approach: an echocardiographic comparison between VATS and thoracotomy.
Objective: Considering the controversial benefits of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), we intended to evaluate the impact of surgical approach on cardiac function after lung resection using myocardial work analysis.
Methods: Echocardiographic data of 48 patients (25 thoracotomy vs. 23 VATS) were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) within 2 weeks before and after surgery, including two-dimensional speckle tracking and tissue Doppler imaging.
Results: No notable changes in left ventricular (LV) function, assessed mainly using the LV global longitudinal strain (GLS), global myocardial work index (GMWI), and global work efficiency (GWE), were observed. Right ventricular (RV) TTE values, including tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), tricuspid annular systolic velocity (TASV), right ventricular global longitudinal strain (RVGLS), and RV free-wall GLS (RVFWGLS), indicated greater RV function impairment in the thoracotomy group than in the VATS group [TAPSE(mm) 17.90 ± 3.80 vs. 21.00 ± 3.48, p = 0.006; d = 0.84; TASV(cm/s): 12.40 ± 2.90 vs. 14.70 ± 2.40, p = 0.004, d = 0.86; RVGLS(%): - 16.00 ± 4.50 vs. - 19.40 ± 2.30, p = 0.012, d = 0.20; RVFWGLS(%): - 11.50 ± 8.50 vs. - 18.31 ± 5.40, p = 0.009, d = 0.59; respectively].
Conclusions: Unlike RV function, LV function remained preserved after lung resection. The thoracotomy group exhibited greater RV function impairment than did the VATS group. Further studies should evaluate the long-term impact of surgical approach on cardiac function.
期刊介绍:
The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.