[硬膜下置管位置。硬膜外麻醉的并发症]。

IF 1.9 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
Regional-Anaesthesie Pub Date : 1989-09-01
R Bredtmann, A Scholz
{"title":"[硬膜下置管位置。硬膜外麻醉的并发症]。","authors":"R Bredtmann,&nbsp;A Scholz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A case of an involuntarily placed subdural catheter (between arachnoid and dura) is described. The catheter was thought to be in the epidural space. It was placed at T9/10 in order to achieve postoperative epidural analgesia in a patient with colonic surgery. Administration of 4 ml bupivacaine 0.5% was followed by segmental analgesia (left: C7 to T9, right: T2 to T8) 10 min later. The systolic blood pressure fell from 85 to 50 mmHg. No motor block was detectable. After 150 min remission of analgesia was complete. All effects were reproducible. Using 1.3 ml of a radiopaque fluid, a spinal X-ray film showed a typical subdural picture with radiopacity detectable on the left from C8 to T8 and on the right from T1 to T7. An additional 2.7 ml did not visualize the lumbar subdural space as well. No radiopaque fluid entered the epidural or intrathecal space. It may be that accidental subdural catheter placement in regional anesthesia is not as rare as it was thought to be a few years ago. There is at present no available epidural technique that guarantees the avoidance of this complication. In addition, the symptoms of 'subdural analgesia' vary to a great extent. Therefore, the diagnosis can only be verified by X-ray examination. If patients with epidural analgesia are supervised with care and uncommon dose responses are recognized, subdural catheter placement will not lead to a severe and dangerous situation for the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":77604,"journal":{"name":"Regional-Anaesthesie","volume":"12 5","pages":"102-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"1989-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Subdural location of a catheter. A complication of peridural anesthesia].\",\"authors\":\"R Bredtmann,&nbsp;A Scholz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A case of an involuntarily placed subdural catheter (between arachnoid and dura) is described. The catheter was thought to be in the epidural space. It was placed at T9/10 in order to achieve postoperative epidural analgesia in a patient with colonic surgery. Administration of 4 ml bupivacaine 0.5% was followed by segmental analgesia (left: C7 to T9, right: T2 to T8) 10 min later. The systolic blood pressure fell from 85 to 50 mmHg. No motor block was detectable. After 150 min remission of analgesia was complete. All effects were reproducible. Using 1.3 ml of a radiopaque fluid, a spinal X-ray film showed a typical subdural picture with radiopacity detectable on the left from C8 to T8 and on the right from T1 to T7. An additional 2.7 ml did not visualize the lumbar subdural space as well. No radiopaque fluid entered the epidural or intrathecal space. It may be that accidental subdural catheter placement in regional anesthesia is not as rare as it was thought to be a few years ago. There is at present no available epidural technique that guarantees the avoidance of this complication. In addition, the symptoms of 'subdural analgesia' vary to a great extent. Therefore, the diagnosis can only be verified by X-ray examination. If patients with epidural analgesia are supervised with care and uncommon dose responses are recognized, subdural catheter placement will not lead to a severe and dangerous situation for the patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":77604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"volume\":\"12 5\",\"pages\":\"102-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"1989-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional-Anaesthesie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional-Anaesthesie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一个非自愿放置硬膜下导管(在蛛网膜和硬脑膜之间)的情况被描述。导管被认为在硬膜外腔。它被放置在T9/10,以便在结肠手术患者术后实现硬膜外镇痛。给药4 ml 0.5%布比卡因,10 min后分段镇痛(左:C7 ~ T9,右:T2 ~ T8)。收缩压从85 mmHg降至50 mmHg。未检测到运动阻滞。150min后镇痛完全缓解。所有的效果都是可重复的。使用1.3 ml不透射线的液体,脊柱x线片显示典型的硬膜下图像,左侧C8至T8和右侧T1至T7可见不透射线。另外2.7毫升也没有显示腰椎硬膜下间隙。没有不透射线的液体进入硬膜外或鞘内间隙。这可能是意外硬膜下导管置入区域麻醉并不像几年前认为的那样罕见。目前还没有可用的硬膜外技术来保证避免这种并发症。此外,“硬膜下镇痛”的症状在很大程度上各不相同。因此,诊断只能通过x线检查来证实。如果对硬膜外镇痛的患者进行谨慎的监督,并认识到不常见的剂量反应,硬膜下置管不会导致患者出现严重和危险的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Subdural location of a catheter. A complication of peridural anesthesia].

A case of an involuntarily placed subdural catheter (between arachnoid and dura) is described. The catheter was thought to be in the epidural space. It was placed at T9/10 in order to achieve postoperative epidural analgesia in a patient with colonic surgery. Administration of 4 ml bupivacaine 0.5% was followed by segmental analgesia (left: C7 to T9, right: T2 to T8) 10 min later. The systolic blood pressure fell from 85 to 50 mmHg. No motor block was detectable. After 150 min remission of analgesia was complete. All effects were reproducible. Using 1.3 ml of a radiopaque fluid, a spinal X-ray film showed a typical subdural picture with radiopacity detectable on the left from C8 to T8 and on the right from T1 to T7. An additional 2.7 ml did not visualize the lumbar subdural space as well. No radiopaque fluid entered the epidural or intrathecal space. It may be that accidental subdural catheter placement in regional anesthesia is not as rare as it was thought to be a few years ago. There is at present no available epidural technique that guarantees the avoidance of this complication. In addition, the symptoms of 'subdural analgesia' vary to a great extent. Therefore, the diagnosis can only be verified by X-ray examination. If patients with epidural analgesia are supervised with care and uncommon dose responses are recognized, subdural catheter placement will not lead to a severe and dangerous situation for the patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信