海德格尔与早期希腊人接触亚洲之谜

IF 0.5 3区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Sophia Pub Date : 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1007/s11841-023-00998-5
{"title":"海德格尔与早期希腊人接触亚洲之谜","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s11841-023-00998-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>From the 1920s to the 1960s, Martin Heidegger on several occasions referred to the early Greeks’ encounter with what he called ‘the Asiatic’ (<em>das Asiatische</em>). Meanwhile, he was also concerned with a sort of ontological power of destruction and ruination that according to him should be understood in the Greek sense, which he also called <em>das Asiatische</em>. In this article, I first sketch the contributions made by Asian/African traditions to the origin of Greek philosophy and highlight Heidegger’s own recognition of it in the 1920s. Second, I examine Nietzsche’s remarks bearing on the early Greeks’ intricate bond with the Asiatic, which is formulated in terms of a distinction between the ‘Dionysiac Greeks’ and the ‘Dionysiac barbarians.’ Third, I scrutinize Heidegger’s relevant statements—especially those in the 1930s—in the light of Nietzsche’s influence on him. I argue that two different meanings of the Asiatic are at play in Heidegger’s thought: One is the <em>Greek Asiatic</em>, the Being-historical Asiatic; The other is the <em>alien Asiatic</em>, ‘the most foreign and most difficult’ Asiatic, which has been overcome by the Greeks. Fourth, I show that in the 1960s Heidegger seems to consider a sort of conflation of these two meanings—a conflation that remains fraught with tension.</p>","PeriodicalId":44736,"journal":{"name":"Sophia","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Heidegger and the Riddle of the Early Greeks’ Encounter with das Asiatische\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11841-023-00998-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Abstract</h3> <p>From the 1920s to the 1960s, Martin Heidegger on several occasions referred to the early Greeks’ encounter with what he called ‘the Asiatic’ (<em>das Asiatische</em>). Meanwhile, he was also concerned with a sort of ontological power of destruction and ruination that according to him should be understood in the Greek sense, which he also called <em>das Asiatische</em>. In this article, I first sketch the contributions made by Asian/African traditions to the origin of Greek philosophy and highlight Heidegger’s own recognition of it in the 1920s. Second, I examine Nietzsche’s remarks bearing on the early Greeks’ intricate bond with the Asiatic, which is formulated in terms of a distinction between the ‘Dionysiac Greeks’ and the ‘Dionysiac barbarians.’ Third, I scrutinize Heidegger’s relevant statements—especially those in the 1930s—in the light of Nietzsche’s influence on him. I argue that two different meanings of the Asiatic are at play in Heidegger’s thought: One is the <em>Greek Asiatic</em>, the Being-historical Asiatic; The other is the <em>alien Asiatic</em>, ‘the most foreign and most difficult’ Asiatic, which has been overcome by the Greeks. Fourth, I show that in the 1960s Heidegger seems to consider a sort of conflation of these two meanings—a conflation that remains fraught with tension.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sophia\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sophia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00998-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sophia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00998-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 从二十世纪二十年代到六十年代,马丁-海德格尔曾多次提到早期希腊人与他所称的 "亚洲人"(das Asiatische)的相遇。同时,他也关注一种本体论上的毁灭和毁灭的力量,他认为这种力量应该从希腊的意义上理解,他也称之为 "亚洲的"(das Asiatische)。在本文中,我首先概述了亚非传统对希腊哲学起源的贡献,并强调了海德格尔本人在 20 世纪 20 年代对此的认识。其次,我研究了尼采关于早期希腊人与亚细亚人之间错综复杂的联系的论述,这种联系是以 "狄奥尼西克希腊人 "与 "狄奥尼西克野蛮人 "之间的区别来表述的。第三,我根据尼采对海德格尔的影响,仔细研究了海德格尔的相关论述,尤其是 20 世纪 30 年代的论述。我认为,在海德格尔的思想中,亚洲人有两种不同的含义:其一是希腊的亚细亚,即存在-历史的亚细亚;其二是外来的亚细亚,即 "最陌生、最困难 "的亚细亚,它已被希腊人征服。第四,我将指出,在 20 世纪 60 年代,海德格尔似乎考虑将这两种意义混为一谈--这种混为一谈仍然充满了张力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Heidegger and the Riddle of the Early Greeks’ Encounter with das Asiatische

Abstract

From the 1920s to the 1960s, Martin Heidegger on several occasions referred to the early Greeks’ encounter with what he called ‘the Asiatic’ (das Asiatische). Meanwhile, he was also concerned with a sort of ontological power of destruction and ruination that according to him should be understood in the Greek sense, which he also called das Asiatische. In this article, I first sketch the contributions made by Asian/African traditions to the origin of Greek philosophy and highlight Heidegger’s own recognition of it in the 1920s. Second, I examine Nietzsche’s remarks bearing on the early Greeks’ intricate bond with the Asiatic, which is formulated in terms of a distinction between the ‘Dionysiac Greeks’ and the ‘Dionysiac barbarians.’ Third, I scrutinize Heidegger’s relevant statements—especially those in the 1930s—in the light of Nietzsche’s influence on him. I argue that two different meanings of the Asiatic are at play in Heidegger’s thought: One is the Greek Asiatic, the Being-historical Asiatic; The other is the alien Asiatic, ‘the most foreign and most difficult’ Asiatic, which has been overcome by the Greeks. Fourth, I show that in the 1960s Heidegger seems to consider a sort of conflation of these two meanings—a conflation that remains fraught with tension.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sophia
Sophia PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Sophia is now published by Springer. The back files, all the way to Volume 1:1, are available via SpringerLink!   Covers both analytic and continental philosophy of religionConsiders both western and non-western perspectives, including Asian and indigenousIncludes specialist contributions, e.g. on feminist and postcolonial philosophy of religionSince its inception in 1962, Sophia has been devoted to providing a forum for discussions in philosophy and religion, focusing on the interstices between metaphysics and theological thinking. The discussions take cognizance of the wider ambience of the sciences (''natural'' philosophy and human/social sciences), ethical and moral concerns in the public sphere, critical feminist theology and cross-cultural perspectives. Sophia''s cross-cultural and cross-frontier approach is reflected not only in the international composition of its editorial board, but also in its consideration of analytic, continental, Asian and indigenous responses to issues and developments in the field of philosophy of religion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信