[COMPARING LAPAROSCOPIC AND ROBOT-ASSISTED PYELOPLASTY FOR URETERO-PELVIC JUNCTION OBSTRUCTION: INITIAL EXPERIENCE FROM A SINGLE CENTER].

(Objective) To compare the initial results of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP) and laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP) for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). (Methods) Between April 2008 to October 2021, we identified 104 cases of UPJO where LP was performed and 18 cases where RALP was performed at our hospital. We retrospectively analyzed their perioperative outcomes. Furthermore, we recorded the operative times for each cases of LP and RALP. (Results) The median operative time for RALP was 141 minutes, which was significantly shorter than that for LP (204 minutes). No patient in the RALP group demonstrated any Clavien-Dindo complications (≥grade 3). During the observation period, improvement of symptoms was observed in all cases. The median suturing time in RALP was 38 minutes. Compared with the last 20 cases of LP, the time to expose the uretero-pelvic junction, the time of renal pelvis incision, and suturing time were significantly shorter in RALP. In addition, the console and suturing times were stable since the initial stage. In cases with a high grade of hydronephrosis, there was a large variation in the time to expose the uretero-pelvic junction and suture the renal pelvis and ureter in LP; however, this variation was smaller in RALP. (Conclusion) At our hospital, RALP for UPJO is considered to be a safe procedure. In the future, it is necessary to consider the long-term results and effectiveness of RALP.