基于生理学的放射药代动力学(PBRPK)建模,用于模拟和分析放射性药物疗法:非线性、多波注射和白蛋白结合研究。

IF 4.4 Q1 CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR
Ali Fele-Paranj, Babak Saboury, Carlos Uribe, Arman Rahmim
{"title":"基于生理学的放射药代动力学(PBRPK)建模,用于模拟和分析放射性药物疗法:非线性、多波注射和白蛋白结合研究。","authors":"Ali Fele-Paranj,&nbsp;Babak Saboury,&nbsp;Carlos Uribe,&nbsp;Arman Rahmim","doi":"10.1186/s41181-023-00236-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to develop a publicly shared computational physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to reliably simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs), including probing of hot-cold ligand competitions as well as alternative injection scenarios and drug designs, towards optimal therapies.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>To handle the complexity of PBPK models (over 150 differential equations), a scalable modeling notation called the “reaction graph” is introduced, enabling easy inclusion of various interactions. We refer to this as physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling, fine-tuned specifically for radiopharmaceuticals. As three important applications, we used our PBRPK model to (1) study the effect of competition between hot and cold species on delivered doses to tumors and organs at risk. In addition, (2) we evaluated an alternative paradigm of utilizing multi-bolus injections in RPTs instead of prevalent single injections. Finally, (3) we used PBRPK modeling to study the impact of varying albumin-binding affinities by ligands, and the implications for RPTs. We found that competition between labeled and unlabeled ligands can lead to non-linear relations between injected activity and the delivered dose to a particular organ, in the sense that doubling the injected activity does not necessarily result in a doubled dose delivered to a particular organ (a false intuition from external beam radiotherapy). In addition, we observed that fractionating injections can lead to a higher payload of dose delivery to organs, though not a differential dose delivery to the tumor. By contrast, we found out that increased albumin-binding affinities of the injected ligands can lead to such a differential effect in delivering more doses to tumors, and this can be attributed to several factors that PBRPK modeling allows us to probe.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advanced computational PBRPK modeling enables simulation and analysis of a variety of intervention and drug design scenarios, towards more optimal delivery of RPTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":534,"journal":{"name":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling to simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies: studies of non-linearities, multi-bolus injections, and albumin binding\",\"authors\":\"Ali Fele-Paranj,&nbsp;Babak Saboury,&nbsp;Carlos Uribe,&nbsp;Arman Rahmim\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s41181-023-00236-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>We aimed to develop a publicly shared computational physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to reliably simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs), including probing of hot-cold ligand competitions as well as alternative injection scenarios and drug designs, towards optimal therapies.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>To handle the complexity of PBPK models (over 150 differential equations), a scalable modeling notation called the “reaction graph” is introduced, enabling easy inclusion of various interactions. We refer to this as physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling, fine-tuned specifically for radiopharmaceuticals. As three important applications, we used our PBRPK model to (1) study the effect of competition between hot and cold species on delivered doses to tumors and organs at risk. In addition, (2) we evaluated an alternative paradigm of utilizing multi-bolus injections in RPTs instead of prevalent single injections. Finally, (3) we used PBRPK modeling to study the impact of varying albumin-binding affinities by ligands, and the implications for RPTs. We found that competition between labeled and unlabeled ligands can lead to non-linear relations between injected activity and the delivered dose to a particular organ, in the sense that doubling the injected activity does not necessarily result in a doubled dose delivered to a particular organ (a false intuition from external beam radiotherapy). In addition, we observed that fractionating injections can lead to a higher payload of dose delivery to organs, though not a differential dose delivery to the tumor. By contrast, we found out that increased albumin-binding affinities of the injected ligands can lead to such a differential effect in delivering more doses to tumors, and this can be attributed to several factors that PBRPK modeling allows us to probe.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Advanced computational PBRPK modeling enables simulation and analysis of a variety of intervention and drug design scenarios, towards more optimal delivery of RPTs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803696/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41181-023-00236-w\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJNMMI Radiopharmacy and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41181-023-00236-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, INORGANIC & NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们的目标是开发一个公开共享的基于生理学的药代动力学(PBPK)计算模型,以可靠地模拟和分析放射性药物疗法(RPT),包括探究冷热配体竞争以及替代注射方案和药物设计,从而实现最佳疗法:为了处理 PBPK 模型的复杂性(超过 150 个微分方程),我们引入了一种名为 "反应图 "的可扩展建模符号,以便于纳入各种相互作用。我们将其称为基于生理学的放射药代动力学(PBRPK)建模,专门针对放射性药物进行了微调。作为三个重要的应用,我们使用 PBRPK 模型:(1)研究冷热物种之间的竞争对肿瘤和危险器官所受剂量的影响。此外,(2) 我们评估了在 RPT 中使用多波段注射而非普遍的单次注射的替代范例。最后,(3) 我们使用 PBRPK 模型研究了配体与白蛋白结合亲和力不同的影响,以及对 RPT 的影响。我们发现,标记配体与非标记配体之间的竞争会导致注射活性与特定器官所受剂量之间的非线性关系,即注射活性加倍并不一定导致特定器官所受剂量加倍(这是外照射放疗的错误直觉)。此外,我们还观察到,分次注射可提高器官的有效剂量,但不会提高肿瘤的剂量。相比之下,我们发现注射配体的白蛋白结合亲和力增加会导致向肿瘤输送更多剂量的差异效应,而这可归因于 PBRPK 模型允许我们探究的几个因素:结论:先进的计算 PBRPK 模型可以模拟和分析各种干预和药物设计方案,从而实现更优化的 RPT 给药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling to simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies: studies of non-linearities, multi-bolus injections, and albumin binding

Background

We aimed to develop a publicly shared computational physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to reliably simulate and analyze radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs), including probing of hot-cold ligand competitions as well as alternative injection scenarios and drug designs, towards optimal therapies.

Results

To handle the complexity of PBPK models (over 150 differential equations), a scalable modeling notation called the “reaction graph” is introduced, enabling easy inclusion of various interactions. We refer to this as physiologically based radiopharmacokinetic (PBRPK) modeling, fine-tuned specifically for radiopharmaceuticals. As three important applications, we used our PBRPK model to (1) study the effect of competition between hot and cold species on delivered doses to tumors and organs at risk. In addition, (2) we evaluated an alternative paradigm of utilizing multi-bolus injections in RPTs instead of prevalent single injections. Finally, (3) we used PBRPK modeling to study the impact of varying albumin-binding affinities by ligands, and the implications for RPTs. We found that competition between labeled and unlabeled ligands can lead to non-linear relations between injected activity and the delivered dose to a particular organ, in the sense that doubling the injected activity does not necessarily result in a doubled dose delivered to a particular organ (a false intuition from external beam radiotherapy). In addition, we observed that fractionating injections can lead to a higher payload of dose delivery to organs, though not a differential dose delivery to the tumor. By contrast, we found out that increased albumin-binding affinities of the injected ligands can lead to such a differential effect in delivering more doses to tumors, and this can be attributed to several factors that PBRPK modeling allows us to probe.

Conclusions

Advanced computational PBRPK modeling enables simulation and analysis of a variety of intervention and drug design scenarios, towards more optimal delivery of RPTs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
30
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信