非药物干预对原发性痛经的疗效:系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。

IF 9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xinglin Li, Xinyu Hao, Jian-Hua Liu, Jian-Peng Huang
{"title":"非药物干预对原发性痛经的疗效:系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Xinglin Li, Xinyu Hao, Jian-Hua Liu, Jian-Peng Huang","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the relative benefits of various non-pharmacological interventions on treating primary dysmenorrhoea within a network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trial involving patient with primary dysmenorrhoea and received non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October first, 2022.</p><p><strong>Risk-of-bias rob assessment: </strong>RoB 2.0 assessment tools was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Conventional meta-analysis was conducted by pairwise comparison between non-pharmacological therapy and control treatment. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by the Aggregate Data Drug Information System Software based on the consistency or inconsistency model, and rank probability was used to indicate the priority of non-pharmacological therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 studies involving eight non-pharmacological interventions were included. With regard to conventional meta-analysis, we selected Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as primary outcome to evaluate the pain intensity. The result showed that eight interventions (Exercise, Herb, Acupuncture, Aromatherapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Topical heat, Acupressure, Yoga) displayed positive effect on reduction of menstrual pain compared with placebo or no treatment. A Bayesian network meta-analysis revealed that exercise -3.20 (95% CI -4.01 to -2.34), acupuncture -2.90 (95% CI -3.97 to -2.85) and topical heat -2.97 (95% CI -4.66 to -1.29) probably resulted in a reduction in pain intensity (VAS) .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions may result in a reduction or slight reduction in pain intensity compared with no treatment or placebo. Specifically, exercise and acupuncture are considered as potentially effective non-pharmacological treatments in short-term treatment. Indeed, larger and better methodological quality research is needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>CRD42022351021.</p>","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"162-170"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137453/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Xinglin Li, Xinyu Hao, Jian-Hua Liu, Jian-Peng Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112434\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the relative benefits of various non-pharmacological interventions on treating primary dysmenorrhoea within a network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Randomised controlled trial involving patient with primary dysmenorrhoea and received non-pharmacological interventions.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October first, 2022.</p><p><strong>Risk-of-bias rob assessment: </strong>RoB 2.0 assessment tools was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.</p><p><strong>Synthesis of results: </strong>Conventional meta-analysis was conducted by pairwise comparison between non-pharmacological therapy and control treatment. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by the Aggregate Data Drug Information System Software based on the consistency or inconsistency model, and rank probability was used to indicate the priority of non-pharmacological therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>33 studies involving eight non-pharmacological interventions were included. With regard to conventional meta-analysis, we selected Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as primary outcome to evaluate the pain intensity. The result showed that eight interventions (Exercise, Herb, Acupuncture, Aromatherapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Topical heat, Acupressure, Yoga) displayed positive effect on reduction of menstrual pain compared with placebo or no treatment. A Bayesian network meta-analysis revealed that exercise -3.20 (95% CI -4.01 to -2.34), acupuncture -2.90 (95% CI -3.97 to -2.85) and topical heat -2.97 (95% CI -4.66 to -1.29) probably resulted in a reduction in pain intensity (VAS) .</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-pharmacological interventions may result in a reduction or slight reduction in pain intensity compared with no treatment or placebo. Specifically, exercise and acupuncture are considered as potentially effective non-pharmacological treatments in short-term treatment. Indeed, larger and better methodological quality research is needed.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>CRD42022351021.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"162-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11137453/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112434\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112434","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究目的在网络荟萃分析中评估各种非药物干预对治疗原发性痛经的相对益处:研究设计:系统回顾和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析:研究设计:系统综述和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。纳入标准:涉及原发性痛经患者并接受非药物干预的随机对照试验:检索了从开始到2022年10月1日的四个数据库(Medline、Embase、Cochrane Library和Web of Science):使用 RoB 2.0 评估工具评估纳入研究的偏倚风险:传统的荟萃分析是通过非药物疗法和对照疗法之间的配对比较进行的。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析由聚合数据药物信息系统软件根据一致性或不一致性模型进行,并使用等级概率表示非药物疗法的优先级:结果:共纳入 33 项研究,涉及 8 种非药物干预措施。根据传统的荟萃分析,我们选择视觉模拟量表(VAS)作为评估疼痛强度的主要结果。结果显示,与安慰剂或无治疗相比,八种干预措施(运动、草药、针灸、芳香疗法、经皮神经电刺激、局部热敷、指压、瑜伽)对减轻经痛有积极作用。贝叶斯网络荟萃分析显示,运动-3.20(95% CI -4.01至-2.34)、针灸-2.90(95% CI -3.97至-2.85)和局部热敷-2.97(95% CI -4.66至-1.29)可能会降低疼痛强度(VAS):与不治疗或安慰剂相比,非药物干预可能会减轻或轻微减轻疼痛强度。具体而言,运动和针灸被认为是短期治疗中可能有效的非药物疗法。事实上,还需要更大规模和方法质量更高的研究:试验注册号:CRD42022351021。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Objectives: To assess the relative benefits of various non-pharmacological interventions on treating primary dysmenorrhoea within a network meta-analysis.

Study design: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trial involving patient with primary dysmenorrhoea and received non-pharmacological interventions.

Data sources: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October first, 2022.

Risk-of-bias rob assessment: RoB 2.0 assessment tools was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.

Synthesis of results: Conventional meta-analysis was conducted by pairwise comparison between non-pharmacological therapy and control treatment. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by the Aggregate Data Drug Information System Software based on the consistency or inconsistency model, and rank probability was used to indicate the priority of non-pharmacological therapy.

Results: 33 studies involving eight non-pharmacological interventions were included. With regard to conventional meta-analysis, we selected Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as primary outcome to evaluate the pain intensity. The result showed that eight interventions (Exercise, Herb, Acupuncture, Aromatherapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Topical heat, Acupressure, Yoga) displayed positive effect on reduction of menstrual pain compared with placebo or no treatment. A Bayesian network meta-analysis revealed that exercise -3.20 (95% CI -4.01 to -2.34), acupuncture -2.90 (95% CI -3.97 to -2.85) and topical heat -2.97 (95% CI -4.66 to -1.29) probably resulted in a reduction in pain intensity (VAS) .

Conclusions: Non-pharmacological interventions may result in a reduction or slight reduction in pain intensity compared with no treatment or placebo. Specifically, exercise and acupuncture are considered as potentially effective non-pharmacological treatments in short-term treatment. Indeed, larger and better methodological quality research is needed.

Trial registration number: CRD42022351021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (BMJ EBM) publishes original evidence-based research, insights and opinions on what matters for health care. We focus on the tools, methods, and concepts that are basic and central to practising evidence-based medicine and deliver relevant, trustworthy and impactful evidence. BMJ EBM is a Plan S compliant Transformative Journal and adheres to the highest possible industry standards for editorial policies and publication ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信