筋膜平面阻滞的围手术期使用;土耳其麻醉科和复苏科医生的方法:全国调查研究。

Onur Balaban, Ali Eman
{"title":"筋膜平面阻滞的围手术期使用;土耳其麻醉科和复苏科医生的方法:全国调查研究。","authors":"Onur Balaban, Ali Eman","doi":"10.14744/agri.2023.67674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to assess the approach of Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialists to the perioperative use of truncal/fascial plane blocks (FPB) in various surgeries. A survey was designed to evaluate the perioperative management of FPBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesiology and Reanimation specialists and residents in various hospitals in Türkiye were surveyed on a voluntary basis. We contacted them between June 1 and September 10, 2022, using email and smartphone messenger applications. They were asked to complete a questionnaire form regarding the perioperative management of FPBs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 242 anesthesiology specialists and residents responded to the survey. Most participants (42.3%) were anesthesiology specialists in 3rd level (academic, teaching, or university) hospitals. 90% of the participants use these blocks in their clinical practice. The primarily used FPBs were the erector spinae plane (ESP) (629 responses in all categories).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anesthesia and reanimation specialists in Türkiye are reasonably familiar with FPBs and use these blocks frequently in clinical practice. The primarily preferred blocks seem to be ESP and TAP blocks. Lack of equipment is a major reason for the non-performance of FPBs. There is still a lack/need for additional education and training for these blocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":101341,"journal":{"name":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","volume":"36 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative use of fascial plane blocks; anesthesiology and reanimation physicians' approach in Türkiye: A national survey study.\",\"authors\":\"Onur Balaban, Ali Eman\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/agri.2023.67674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Our aim was to assess the approach of Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialists to the perioperative use of truncal/fascial plane blocks (FPB) in various surgeries. A survey was designed to evaluate the perioperative management of FPBs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Anesthesiology and Reanimation specialists and residents in various hospitals in Türkiye were surveyed on a voluntary basis. We contacted them between June 1 and September 10, 2022, using email and smartphone messenger applications. They were asked to complete a questionnaire form regarding the perioperative management of FPBs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 242 anesthesiology specialists and residents responded to the survey. Most participants (42.3%) were anesthesiology specialists in 3rd level (academic, teaching, or university) hospitals. 90% of the participants use these blocks in their clinical practice. The primarily used FPBs were the erector spinae plane (ESP) (629 responses in all categories).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The anesthesia and reanimation specialists in Türkiye are reasonably familiar with FPBs and use these blocks frequently in clinical practice. The primarily preferred blocks seem to be ESP and TAP blocks. Lack of equipment is a major reason for the non-performance of FPBs. There is still a lack/need for additional education and training for these blocks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"45-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2023.67674\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agri : Agri (Algoloji) Dernegi'nin Yayin organidir = The journal of the Turkish Society of Algology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2023.67674","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是评估土耳其麻醉和复苏专科医生在各种手术围手术期使用躯干/筋膜平面阻滞(FPB)的方法。该调查旨在评估 FPB 的围手术期管理:方法:在自愿的基础上对土耳其多家医院的麻醉科和复苏科专家及住院医师进行了调查。我们在 2022 年 6 月 1 日至 9 月 10 日期间通过电子邮件和智能手机信使应用程序与他们取得了联系。我们要求他们填写一份有关 FPB 围手术期管理的问卷:共有 242 名麻醉学专家和住院医师对调查做出了回应。大多数参与者(42.3%)是三级(学术、教学或大学)医院的麻醉学专家。90%的参与者在临床实践中使用这些阻滞。主要使用的 FPB 是竖脊面 (ESP)(所有类别中共有 629 个回答):结论:土耳其的麻醉和复苏专家对 FPB 相当熟悉,并在临床实践中经常使用这些阻滞。首选阻滞似乎是 ESP 和 TAP 阻滞。缺乏设备是不使用 FPB 的主要原因。在这些阻滞方面仍然缺乏/需要额外的教育和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative use of fascial plane blocks; anesthesiology and reanimation physicians' approach in Türkiye: A national survey study.

Objectives: Our aim was to assess the approach of Turkish Anesthesiology and Reanimation Specialists to the perioperative use of truncal/fascial plane blocks (FPB) in various surgeries. A survey was designed to evaluate the perioperative management of FPBs.

Methods: Anesthesiology and Reanimation specialists and residents in various hospitals in Türkiye were surveyed on a voluntary basis. We contacted them between June 1 and September 10, 2022, using email and smartphone messenger applications. They were asked to complete a questionnaire form regarding the perioperative management of FPBs.

Results: A total of 242 anesthesiology specialists and residents responded to the survey. Most participants (42.3%) were anesthesiology specialists in 3rd level (academic, teaching, or university) hospitals. 90% of the participants use these blocks in their clinical practice. The primarily used FPBs were the erector spinae plane (ESP) (629 responses in all categories).

Conclusion: The anesthesia and reanimation specialists in Türkiye are reasonably familiar with FPBs and use these blocks frequently in clinical practice. The primarily preferred blocks seem to be ESP and TAP blocks. Lack of equipment is a major reason for the non-performance of FPBs. There is still a lack/need for additional education and training for these blocks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信