约翰-普卡特是恶棍》,作者金伯利-贝尔弗劳尔;以及好约翰-普卡特》,作者 Talene Monahon(评论)

IF 0.8 3区 艺术学 0 THEATER
Sean F. Edgecomb
{"title":"约翰-普卡特是恶棍》,作者金伯利-贝尔弗劳尔;以及好约翰-普卡特》,作者 Talene Monahon(评论)","authors":"Sean F. Edgecomb","doi":"10.1353/tj.2023.a917487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>John Proctor is the Villain</em> by Kimberly Belflower, and: <em>The Good John Proctor</em> by Talene Monahon <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sean F. Edgecomb </li> </ul> <em>JOHN PROCTOR IS THE VILLAIN</em>. By Kimberly Belflower. Directed by Marti Lyons. Studio Theatre, Washington D.C. May 12, 2022. <em>THE GOOD JOHN PROCTOR</em>. By Talene Monahon. Directed by Caitlin Sullivan. Bedlam Theatre Company at the Connelly Theater, New York. March 30, 2023. <p>The past year saw productions of two original plays inspired by Arthur Miller’s <em>The Crucible</em>: Kimberly Belflower’s <em>John Proctor is the Villain</em> and Talene Monahon’s <em>The Good John Proctor.</em> In their exciting scripts, Belflower and Monahon respond to how Miller’s play pulled the focus from women (particularly the adolescent girls who acted as accusers in the story), to center and sanctify the character of John Proctor. Proctor is considered a “modern tragic hero” and a paragon of integrity by a slew of literary critics.</p> <p>Belflower and Monahon present contemporary feminist narratives that recenter women while helping to fill in the gaps that remain in official, patriarchal histories of the Salem Witch Trials. In this sense, the female characters in both plays engage in a kind of witchcraft—not as a religious practice, but rather as redefined by Sylvia Frederici as a “transfer of [feminist] knowledge.” Both playwrights engage a feminist perspective to question John Proctor’s character—but with different, equally dynamic approaches.</p> <p>Belflower uses a high school class studying <em>The Crucible</em> to resurrect and embody the women failed by Proctor in Miller’s play, namely Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor, as a commentary on the #MeToo movement. In contrast, Monahon returns to the seventeenth century and reimagines the period that led to Salem’s witch hysteria. Playing with contemporary language to show how Abigail Williams and her younger cousin Betty (both central to Miller’s narrative), were forced into their situation, Monahon exposes a world where Puritan superstition, draconian rules, and rampant misogyny grounded in religious fervor ensured that women in 1692 Salem were denied authority, voice, and freedom.</p> <p>Miller wrote <em>The Crucible</em> as a theatrical excoriation of the Red Scare in the United States, taking up fear of witches as an allegory of McCarthyism. The play remains a widely produced fictionalization of real-life events, and while it was never Miller’s intention to write an accurate account of the Trials, <em>The Crucible</em> has undoubtedly become the interpretation encountered by most people. Such confusion is exacerbated by an ongoing cultural obsession with Salem’s witchy history, which has in turn inspired a variety of adaptations of the story that are more often interested in occult fantasy than historical fact.</p> <br/> Click for larger view<br/> View full resolution <p>Jordan Slattery (Raelyn), Miranda Rizzolo (Beth), and Deidre Staples (Nell) in <em>John Proctor is the Villain.</em> Photo: Margot Schulman.</p> <p></p> <p>Belflower pulls upon the ubiquitous popularity of <em>The Crucible</em> by setting her play in a high school English class in rural Georgia. Miller’s play is a part of the curriculum—just as it has been across the United States since its publication. Much like in <em>The Crucible,</em> the plot largely revolves around <strong>[End Page 366]</strong> teenage girls—Raelyn (Jordan Slattery), the Baptist minister’s daughter who longs to see more of the world than her one-stoplight town; Shelby (Juliana Sass), Raelyn’s former best friend, who has only just returned after leaving town for several months amidst rumors that she got an abortion after getting pregnant with Raelyn’s boyfriend; Beth (Miranda Rizzolo), a Pollyannaish, straight-A student whose feminist intentions are sometimes clouded by her Christian conservatism; Ivy (Resa Mishina), whose father has just been accused of having an affair with his secretary; and finally Nell (Deidre Staples), a Black student, whose family has just relocated from Atlanta, and who is sometimes perplexed by the small-minded inequities of backwoods politics, where church and state are anything but separate. The hyper-realistic classroom set design by Luciana Stecconi reminded the audience that while the classroom is supposedly designed to be a space for the dissemination of knowledge and hopefully the generation of new, more inclusive ideas, the public education system in places like rural Georgia can also be a site of censorship...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":46247,"journal":{"name":"THEATRE JOURNAL","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Proctor is the Villain by Kimberly Belflower, and: The Good John Proctor by Talene Monahon (review)\",\"authors\":\"Sean F. Edgecomb\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/tj.2023.a917487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>John Proctor is the Villain</em> by Kimberly Belflower, and: <em>The Good John Proctor</em> by Talene Monahon <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Sean F. Edgecomb </li> </ul> <em>JOHN PROCTOR IS THE VILLAIN</em>. By Kimberly Belflower. Directed by Marti Lyons. Studio Theatre, Washington D.C. May 12, 2022. <em>THE GOOD JOHN PROCTOR</em>. By Talene Monahon. Directed by Caitlin Sullivan. Bedlam Theatre Company at the Connelly Theater, New York. March 30, 2023. <p>The past year saw productions of two original plays inspired by Arthur Miller’s <em>The Crucible</em>: Kimberly Belflower’s <em>John Proctor is the Villain</em> and Talene Monahon’s <em>The Good John Proctor.</em> In their exciting scripts, Belflower and Monahon respond to how Miller’s play pulled the focus from women (particularly the adolescent girls who acted as accusers in the story), to center and sanctify the character of John Proctor. Proctor is considered a “modern tragic hero” and a paragon of integrity by a slew of literary critics.</p> <p>Belflower and Monahon present contemporary feminist narratives that recenter women while helping to fill in the gaps that remain in official, patriarchal histories of the Salem Witch Trials. In this sense, the female characters in both plays engage in a kind of witchcraft—not as a religious practice, but rather as redefined by Sylvia Frederici as a “transfer of [feminist] knowledge.” Both playwrights engage a feminist perspective to question John Proctor’s character—but with different, equally dynamic approaches.</p> <p>Belflower uses a high school class studying <em>The Crucible</em> to resurrect and embody the women failed by Proctor in Miller’s play, namely Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor, as a commentary on the #MeToo movement. In contrast, Monahon returns to the seventeenth century and reimagines the period that led to Salem’s witch hysteria. Playing with contemporary language to show how Abigail Williams and her younger cousin Betty (both central to Miller’s narrative), were forced into their situation, Monahon exposes a world where Puritan superstition, draconian rules, and rampant misogyny grounded in religious fervor ensured that women in 1692 Salem were denied authority, voice, and freedom.</p> <p>Miller wrote <em>The Crucible</em> as a theatrical excoriation of the Red Scare in the United States, taking up fear of witches as an allegory of McCarthyism. The play remains a widely produced fictionalization of real-life events, and while it was never Miller’s intention to write an accurate account of the Trials, <em>The Crucible</em> has undoubtedly become the interpretation encountered by most people. Such confusion is exacerbated by an ongoing cultural obsession with Salem’s witchy history, which has in turn inspired a variety of adaptations of the story that are more often interested in occult fantasy than historical fact.</p> <br/> Click for larger view<br/> View full resolution <p>Jordan Slattery (Raelyn), Miranda Rizzolo (Beth), and Deidre Staples (Nell) in <em>John Proctor is the Villain.</em> Photo: Margot Schulman.</p> <p></p> <p>Belflower pulls upon the ubiquitous popularity of <em>The Crucible</em> by setting her play in a high school English class in rural Georgia. Miller’s play is a part of the curriculum—just as it has been across the United States since its publication. Much like in <em>The Crucible,</em> the plot largely revolves around <strong>[End Page 366]</strong> teenage girls—Raelyn (Jordan Slattery), the Baptist minister’s daughter who longs to see more of the world than her one-stoplight town; Shelby (Juliana Sass), Raelyn’s former best friend, who has only just returned after leaving town for several months amidst rumors that she got an abortion after getting pregnant with Raelyn’s boyfriend; Beth (Miranda Rizzolo), a Pollyannaish, straight-A student whose feminist intentions are sometimes clouded by her Christian conservatism; Ivy (Resa Mishina), whose father has just been accused of having an affair with his secretary; and finally Nell (Deidre Staples), a Black student, whose family has just relocated from Atlanta, and who is sometimes perplexed by the small-minded inequities of backwoods politics, where church and state are anything but separate. The hyper-realistic classroom set design by Luciana Stecconi reminded the audience that while the classroom is supposedly designed to be a space for the dissemination of knowledge and hopefully the generation of new, more inclusive ideas, the public education system in places like rural Georgia can also be a site of censorship...</p> </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46247,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"THEATRE JOURNAL\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a917487\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THEATRE JOURNAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/tj.2023.a917487","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者: 约翰-普卡特是恶棍》,作者金伯利-贝尔弗劳尔,以及约翰-普罗克托是个恶棍》。作者:Kimberly Belflower。导演:Marti Lyons。华盛顿特区工作室剧院,2022 年 5 月 12 日。好约翰-普罗克托塔琳-莫纳洪著导演:凯特琳-沙利文。纽约康纳利剧院的 Bedlam 剧团。2023 年 3 月 30 日。在过去的一年里,我们上演了两部受阿瑟-米勒(Arthur Miller)的《十字架》(The Crucible)启发创作的原创戏剧:Kimberly Belflower 的《John Proctor is the Villain》和 Talene Monahon 的《The Good John Proctor》。在她们精彩的剧本中,贝尔弗劳尔和莫纳洪回应了米勒的戏剧是如何将焦点从女性(尤其是故事中充当原告的少女)转移到约翰-普卡特这个人物身上并将其神圣化的。普罗克托被众多文学评论家视为 "现代悲剧英雄 "和正直的典范。贝尔弗劳尔和莫纳洪展现了当代女权主义叙事,以女性为中心,同时帮助填补塞勒姆女巫审判官方父权制历史中的空白。从这个意义上说,两部剧中的女性角色都参与了一种巫术--不是作为一种宗教实践,而是被西尔维亚-弗雷德里克重新定义为"[女权主义]知识的传递"。两位剧作家都从女性主义的视角来质疑约翰-普卡特的性格,但方法不同,同样充满活力。贝尔弗洛尔利用一个学习《十字架》的高中班,复活并体现了米勒剧中被普罗克托辜负的女性,即阿比盖尔-威廉姆斯和伊丽莎白-普罗克托,以此作为对 #MeToo 运动的评论。相比之下,莫纳洪回到十七世纪,重新想象了导致塞勒姆女巫歇斯底里的那个时代。莫纳洪运用现代语言展示了阿比盖尔-威廉姆斯和她的小表妹贝蒂(两人都是米勒叙事的核心人物)是如何被迫陷入困境的,她揭露了这样一个世界:清教徒的迷信、苛刻的规则以及基于宗教狂热的猖獗的厌女症确保了 1692 年塞勒姆的女性被剥夺了权威、发言权和自由。米勒在创作《十字架》时,将对女巫的恐惧作为麦卡锡主义的寓言,对美国的红色恐慌进行了戏剧性的抨击。尽管米勒从未打算准确描述审判过程,但《坩埚》无疑已成为大多数人的解读。对塞勒姆女巫历史的持续文化痴迷加剧了这种混淆,这反过来又激发了对故事的各种改编,而这些改编往往对神秘幻想而非历史事实更感兴趣。 点击查看大图 查看完整分辨率 乔丹-斯拉特里(Jordan Slattery,饰 Raelyn)、米兰达-里佐罗(Miranda Rizzolo,饰 Beth)和迪德丽-斯泰普尔斯(Deidre Staples,饰 Nell)在《约翰-普卡特是恶棍》中。照片:Margot Schulman:Margot Schulman。 贝尔弗劳尔利用《十字架》无处不在的知名度,将她的戏剧背景设定在佐治亚州农村的高中英语课堂上。米勒的剧本是课程的一部分--就像它自出版以来就一直在美国各地流传一样。与《坩埚》一样,剧情主要围绕着少女展开--蕾琳(乔丹-斯莱特里饰),浸礼会牧师的女儿,她渴望看到更多的世界,而不是她那个只有一盏灯的小镇;谢尔比(朱莉安娜-萨斯饰),蕾琳以前最好的朋友,她离开小镇几个月后才回来,因为有传言说她怀了蕾琳男友的孩子后去堕胎了;贝丝(米兰达-里佐洛 饰),一个恬静、成绩优秀的学生,她的女权主义意图有时会被她的基督教保守主义所蒙蔽;艾薇(瑞莎-米希娜 饰),她的父亲刚刚被指控与他的秘书有染;最后是内尔(迪德丽-斯台普斯 饰),一个黑人学生,她的家庭刚刚从亚特兰大搬迁过来,她有时会对落后地区政治的狭隘不平等感到困惑,在那里,教会和国家并不分离。Luciana Stecconi 超现实的教室布景设计提醒观众,教室本应是传播知识的空间,希望能产生新的、更具包容性的思想,但在佐治亚州农村地区,公共教育系统也可能是审查的场所......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
John Proctor is the Villain by Kimberly Belflower, and: The Good John Proctor by Talene Monahon (review)
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • John Proctor is the Villain by Kimberly Belflower, and: The Good John Proctor by Talene Monahon
  • Sean F. Edgecomb
JOHN PROCTOR IS THE VILLAIN. By Kimberly Belflower. Directed by Marti Lyons. Studio Theatre, Washington D.C. May 12, 2022. THE GOOD JOHN PROCTOR. By Talene Monahon. Directed by Caitlin Sullivan. Bedlam Theatre Company at the Connelly Theater, New York. March 30, 2023.

The past year saw productions of two original plays inspired by Arthur Miller’s The Crucible: Kimberly Belflower’s John Proctor is the Villain and Talene Monahon’s The Good John Proctor. In their exciting scripts, Belflower and Monahon respond to how Miller’s play pulled the focus from women (particularly the adolescent girls who acted as accusers in the story), to center and sanctify the character of John Proctor. Proctor is considered a “modern tragic hero” and a paragon of integrity by a slew of literary critics.

Belflower and Monahon present contemporary feminist narratives that recenter women while helping to fill in the gaps that remain in official, patriarchal histories of the Salem Witch Trials. In this sense, the female characters in both plays engage in a kind of witchcraft—not as a religious practice, but rather as redefined by Sylvia Frederici as a “transfer of [feminist] knowledge.” Both playwrights engage a feminist perspective to question John Proctor’s character—but with different, equally dynamic approaches.

Belflower uses a high school class studying The Crucible to resurrect and embody the women failed by Proctor in Miller’s play, namely Abigail Williams and Elizabeth Proctor, as a commentary on the #MeToo movement. In contrast, Monahon returns to the seventeenth century and reimagines the period that led to Salem’s witch hysteria. Playing with contemporary language to show how Abigail Williams and her younger cousin Betty (both central to Miller’s narrative), were forced into their situation, Monahon exposes a world where Puritan superstition, draconian rules, and rampant misogyny grounded in religious fervor ensured that women in 1692 Salem were denied authority, voice, and freedom.

Miller wrote The Crucible as a theatrical excoriation of the Red Scare in the United States, taking up fear of witches as an allegory of McCarthyism. The play remains a widely produced fictionalization of real-life events, and while it was never Miller’s intention to write an accurate account of the Trials, The Crucible has undoubtedly become the interpretation encountered by most people. Such confusion is exacerbated by an ongoing cultural obsession with Salem’s witchy history, which has in turn inspired a variety of adaptations of the story that are more often interested in occult fantasy than historical fact.


Click for larger view
View full resolution

Jordan Slattery (Raelyn), Miranda Rizzolo (Beth), and Deidre Staples (Nell) in John Proctor is the Villain. Photo: Margot Schulman.

Belflower pulls upon the ubiquitous popularity of The Crucible by setting her play in a high school English class in rural Georgia. Miller’s play is a part of the curriculum—just as it has been across the United States since its publication. Much like in The Crucible, the plot largely revolves around [End Page 366] teenage girls—Raelyn (Jordan Slattery), the Baptist minister’s daughter who longs to see more of the world than her one-stoplight town; Shelby (Juliana Sass), Raelyn’s former best friend, who has only just returned after leaving town for several months amidst rumors that she got an abortion after getting pregnant with Raelyn’s boyfriend; Beth (Miranda Rizzolo), a Pollyannaish, straight-A student whose feminist intentions are sometimes clouded by her Christian conservatism; Ivy (Resa Mishina), whose father has just been accused of having an affair with his secretary; and finally Nell (Deidre Staples), a Black student, whose family has just relocated from Atlanta, and who is sometimes perplexed by the small-minded inequities of backwoods politics, where church and state are anything but separate. The hyper-realistic classroom set design by Luciana Stecconi reminded the audience that while the classroom is supposedly designed to be a space for the dissemination of knowledge and hopefully the generation of new, more inclusive ideas, the public education system in places like rural Georgia can also be a site of censorship...

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
THEATRE JOURNAL
THEATRE JOURNAL THEATER-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
40.00%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: For over five decades, Theatre Journal"s broad array of scholarly articles and reviews has earned it an international reputation as one of the most authoritative and useful publications of theatre studies available today. Drawing contributions from noted practitioners and scholars, Theatre Journal features social and historical studies, production reviews, and theoretical inquiries that analyze dramatic texts and production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信