LIMB-Q:针对下肢创伤患者的新型患者报告结果测量方法的可靠性和有效性。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Plastic and reconstructive surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-15 DOI:10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293
Lily R Mundy, Anne F Klassen, Andrea L Pusic, Tim deJong, Scott T Hollenbeck, Mark J Gage
{"title":"LIMB-Q:针对下肢创伤患者的新型患者报告结果测量方法的可靠性和有效性。","authors":"Lily R Mundy, Anne F Klassen, Andrea L Pusic, Tim deJong, Scott T Hollenbeck, Mark J Gage","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The LIMB-Q is a novel patient-reported outcome measure for patients with lower extremity trauma. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the LIMB-Q based on the Rasch measurement theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international, multisite convenience sample of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries distal to the midfemur was recruited from clinical sites in the United States and the Netherlands and online platforms (in English; Trauma Survivors Network patient support group and the Prolific academic research platform). A cross-sectional survey of the LIMB-Q was conducted with test-retest reliability analysis performed 1 to 2 weeks after initial completion in a subgroup of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LIMB-Q was field-tested in 713 patients. The mean age was 41 years (SD, 17 years; range, 18 to 85 years), the mean time from injury was 7 years (SD, 9 years; range, 0 to 58 years), and there were various injury and treatment characteristics (39% fracture surgery only, 38% flap or graft, 13% amputation, 10% amputation and flap or graft). Out of 382 items tested, 164 were retained across 16 scales. Reliability was demonstrated with person separation index values of 0.80 or greater in 14 scales (0.78 to 0.79 in the remaining 2 scales), Cronbach alpha values 0.83 or greater, and intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.70 or greater. Each scale was unidimensional, measurement invariance was confirmed across clinical and demographic factors, test-retest analysis showed adequate reliability, and construct validity was demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LIMB-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure with 16 independently functioning scales (6 to 15 items per scale) developed and validated specifically for patients with lower extremity trauma with fractures, reconstruction, or amputation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":"1332-1340"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients with Lower Extremity Trauma.\",\"authors\":\"Lily R Mundy, Anne F Klassen, Andrea L Pusic, Tim deJong, Scott T Hollenbeck, Mark J Gage\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The LIMB-Q is a novel patient-reported outcome measure for patients with lower extremity trauma. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the LIMB-Q based on the Rasch measurement theory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An international, multisite convenience sample of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries distal to the midfemur was recruited from clinical sites in the United States and the Netherlands and online platforms (in English; Trauma Survivors Network patient support group and the Prolific academic research platform). A cross-sectional survey of the LIMB-Q was conducted with test-retest reliability analysis performed 1 to 2 weeks after initial completion in a subgroup of patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LIMB-Q was field-tested in 713 patients. The mean age was 41 years (SD, 17 years; range, 18 to 85 years), the mean time from injury was 7 years (SD, 9 years; range, 0 to 58 years), and there were various injury and treatment characteristics (39% fracture surgery only, 38% flap or graft, 13% amputation, 10% amputation and flap or graft). Out of 382 items tested, 164 were retained across 16 scales. Reliability was demonstrated with person separation index values of 0.80 or greater in 14 scales (0.78 to 0.79 in the remaining 2 scales), Cronbach alpha values 0.83 or greater, and intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.70 or greater. Each scale was unidimensional, measurement invariance was confirmed across clinical and demographic factors, test-retest analysis showed adequate reliability, and construct validity was demonstrated.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LIMB-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure with 16 independently functioning scales (6 to 15 items per scale) developed and validated specifically for patients with lower extremity trauma with fractures, reconstruction, or amputation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20128,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1332-1340\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Plastic and reconstructive surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011293","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:LIMB-Q是一种针对下肢创伤患者的新型患者报告结果测量方法。本研究的目的是基于 Rasch 测量理论对 LIMB-Q 进行心理测量验证:方法:通过临床站点(美国、荷兰)和在线平台(英语;创伤幸存者网络、Prolific)对下肢中段远端创伤患者进行国际性多站点便利抽样调查。对一组患者进行了LIMB-Q横断面调查,并在初次完成调查后1-2周测量了测试-休息(TRT):结果:对 713 名患者进行了 LIMB-Q 实地测试。平均年龄为 41 岁(标准差 (SD) 17,范围为 18-85),平均受伤时间为 7 年(标准差 9,范围为 0-58),受伤和治疗特征各不相同(39% 仅进行了骨折手术,38% 进行了皮瓣或植皮手术,13% 进行了截肢手术,10% 进行了截肢和皮瓣/植皮手术)。在测试的 382 个项目中,164 个项目在 16 个量表中得到保留。有 14 个量表的人称分离指数达到或超过 0.80(其余 2 个量表的人称分离指数为 0.78-0.79),Cronbach α 值达到或超过 0.83,类内相关系数达到或超过 0.70。每个量表都是单维度的,测量不变性在临床和人口学因素中得到了证实,TRT显示了足够的可靠性,并证明了构建有效性:LIMB-Q是一种患者报告结果测量方法,包含16个独立功能量表(每个量表6-15个项目),专门针对骨折、重建和/或截肢的下肢创伤患者开发和验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients with Lower Extremity Trauma.

Background: The LIMB-Q is a novel patient-reported outcome measure for patients with lower extremity trauma. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the LIMB-Q based on the Rasch measurement theory.

Methods: An international, multisite convenience sample of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries distal to the midfemur was recruited from clinical sites in the United States and the Netherlands and online platforms (in English; Trauma Survivors Network patient support group and the Prolific academic research platform). A cross-sectional survey of the LIMB-Q was conducted with test-retest reliability analysis performed 1 to 2 weeks after initial completion in a subgroup of patients.

Results: The LIMB-Q was field-tested in 713 patients. The mean age was 41 years (SD, 17 years; range, 18 to 85 years), the mean time from injury was 7 years (SD, 9 years; range, 0 to 58 years), and there were various injury and treatment characteristics (39% fracture surgery only, 38% flap or graft, 13% amputation, 10% amputation and flap or graft). Out of 382 items tested, 164 were retained across 16 scales. Reliability was demonstrated with person separation index values of 0.80 or greater in 14 scales (0.78 to 0.79 in the remaining 2 scales), Cronbach alpha values 0.83 or greater, and intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.70 or greater. Each scale was unidimensional, measurement invariance was confirmed across clinical and demographic factors, test-retest analysis showed adequate reliability, and construct validity was demonstrated.

Conclusion: The LIMB-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure with 16 independently functioning scales (6 to 15 items per scale) developed and validated specifically for patients with lower extremity trauma with fractures, reconstruction, or amputation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
13.90%
发文量
1436
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信